May 20, 1971 Pg 4-5 |
Previous | 37 of 41 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
THE DAILY COLLEGIAN 'Thuraday, May 10, 1971 Non-involvement — a policy of self destruction By Martyn Green "/ do my thing, and you d These words by Frederick S. Perls seem an admirable philosophy - it first sight But If we consider them a moment we realize that tbey are espousing nothing less than a policy of non- Involveroent. "You do your thing and I'U do mine," appears to be an excellent Idea, for It allows us the freedom to be ourselves - or so It seems. But suppose we see somebody ailing themselves slowly on drugs - are we supposed to turn our heads away and not care - because he ls doing his thing? «Or worse still - if we see a man viciously beating his child, are we to turn a deaf ear to Its screams — because he should be allowed to'do his thing?" Should we permit a man to drive recklessly down the freeway, doing his "thing* Uke mad, thereby causing a wreck that doesn't harm HIM ln the sUghtest - but kills three other people? Granting him total freedom to do his thing then, would eventually deny others the right to do theirs. SHORTSIGHTED I therefore suggest that this Ideal Is a shortsighted one - a great theory but a poor practice. We cannot so rashly deny our concern for others. We cannot say we don't want to get Involved - we ARE Involved. If nothing else, we are Involved.with others Ity. This we cannot deny. We cannot forsake our commitment to others without forsaking Ufe itself. With Ufe comes the concomittant of care, concern, empathy and Identification with others. We can't NOT be Involved- we ARE. And yet In America and other western societies we are wlt- nlal of that which we are. "If you are ln a big city," advises Marshall McCluhan, "and you are attacked, don't shout 'Help!' -that requires too much commitment. Shout 'Fire!'. People can handle something Uke that without getting Involved." Fear of getting Involved Is not new. Can one ever forget the Infamy of the triple stabbing of Catherine Genovese In New York one night In 1963? No less than thirty-eight people heard her screams — but none went to help or even called the police. Their excuse? "We didn't want to get Involved,' they bleated pathetically. TKRRIHLK BTKN_ This sickness Is not only confined to our society. A couple of years ago, a party of British university students were driving their Jeep up a mountainous road ln northern Norway, on their way to do some research In Lapland. EUROPE OneWay CHARTER JET FLIGHTS From Oakland to I Madrid <S Munich • Aug. 26 Marseille <t Pisa - Sept. 1 Stockholm & Copenhagen - Sept. 6 limited number of spaces e available for faculty, staff, students of the California State Colleges Fare: $195 one way For Information: Office of International Programs | The California State Colleges 1600 Holloway Avenue I San Francisco, Calif. 94132 (415)469-1044 no one attempted to come down , and assist In helping the survivors. So, alone, the students picked their way down among the rocks to attend to the Injured with what medical supplies they bad available. Hard to believe? perhaps. But I know the facts are true. My slater was one of the students. IIOl-SENDOl'S SCREAM Then In Australia a Uttle while ago a man attempted to attack a young woman one evening, after stalking her as she walked to her home In a quiet Sydney suburb. When she let out a horrendous scream he fled, flinging her to the ground. Yet no one came out of their houses to see what was wrong. Next day, when the woman outside whose house the girl had been attacked saw her, she confessed that she and her husband had heard the scream the night before. Apparently her husband realized It was "a genuine scream of terror" because It was •the most blood-curdling thing* he had ever heard. Then why didn't be come to help her? •Well,' she said, shuffUng her feet, ^he doesn't like to get In- An unlikely story? Not at all. The young lady concerned, a former girlfriend of mine, told lt to me herself. NOTHING NEW Turning to politics briefly, It ls obvious that a politics of non- lnvolvement Is nothing new. It might even be suggested that ONE of the reasons for the protests against the Vietnam war might be this same, growing, fear of Involvement. (Although, admittedly, the question ls not Just as simple as that.) Fear of Involvement is not only i of physical danger, MOTTO OF OUR AGE Those six words, "I don't want to get Involved" could weU be- ' come the motto of our age. Even ln Interpersonal relationships deplorably often. One reason * could be that the person le 8 afraid of getting hurt - emo- I ttonally if not physically. And ln | thts society which has so much more than a Ukely possibility. What, one may ask, Is the basis for trust ln any society? It ts not an easy question to answer. It may take a long time before one comes to realize that trust ls based on reliability through consistency. Consistency can only come from one thing - nonesty. And to maintain one's honesty, As they rounded a corner they came upon a terrible scene — a bus full of people had spun off down the steep slope and was lying on Its side amongst the rocks a hundred feet below. It must have happened only minutes before as some of the less Injured passengers were then trying to clamber out, covered In blood. Along the edge of the road a small crowd of Norwegians were gathering to view the wrecked bus. Yet not one of their number made a move to go down and help their comrades. It was up to the shocked and disgusted university students to take the initiative. Even after they had I with the onlookers however. It e pleasure pursuits. 'Playboy'mag- azlne. for Instance, represents perhaps the ultimate ln non- Involved sex. The monthly fol_- out Playmate Is Just an Image on a page. Although they claim they "personalize" her with background details, she ls really nothing^more than a Technl- coloured Image of an abstract body — however beautiful that may be. No mind, no heart — and ! no feelings. Hence, no Involve- Even In the area of reality sex Is non-lnvolvlng. One male European student once observed about American girls,'Over here you don't have to say you love them." it might be suggested then that for some people at least, sex ls not so much making love (3__I_rt_e,27Q N - YeArBOoIC fPkk up your copy now at the College Union Information Booth. a Lots of color for only m $2.00 unreliability. Completing the circle then, unreliability muat, t,uite patently, be the bane ol trust. one must have a sense of honour. Wtth UtUe true honour there can be no real honesty. Lack of honesty breeds Inconsistency - and Inconsistency gives rise to unreliability. Completing the circle then, unreliability must, quite patently, be the bane of trust. EVIDENCED EVERYWHERE That there ts so little trust ln this society Is evidenced everywhere — one has only to look around to see lt. It Is even admitted In the papers. Last year, for Instance, a newspaper carried the following report: ". . . Self doubt now runs so deeply Into all levels of U.S. society that even spectacular evidence of the continuing U.S. achievement tends to be ignored or heavily discounted. ... A recent report dug up a most disconcerting fact: a year after the landing on the moon a substantial number of Americans did not believe that lt had happened. In a Washington, D.C., ghetto half of those interviewed expressed doubt that man had reached the moon. Many of the skeptics had seen"Nell Armstrong's moonwalk on television: they thought lt had been faked.* Contrast this with the experience of an F.S.C. student who visited England last year. He was sitting once ln a London railway station ln the early hours of the morning, waiting for his train. A British "Bobby* (policeman), perhaps checking tor vagrants perhaps for some other reason, tapped him on the shoulder and said, 'Excuse me sir X are you traveling?" •Yes," the sleepy young man assured him. •Righto sir," said the Bobby. •Thank you very much." And wtth that he walked away without another word. How many American poUcemen would do that? I would suggest that their first n ., would most likely have b •Let's see your ticket, buddy.* MODULAR RELATIONSHIPS Why then ls America becoming" so sick, so alienated, squntrust- lng - and so unlnvolved? Is tt necessarily a Concomittant of a progressive society ln this modern age of high speed living, with Its built-in obsolesence and modular relationships of replaceable parts? Do we have to go the way we are going? Do we have to disavow our humanity by expressing, overtly or covertly, that we just don't want to get Involved? I think not. Involved ls more than Just a word. It ls an ideal. But even within the word Itself there ls more than at first meets the eye. For instance, one discovers that there ls both "love" and •life* In 'Involvement." (LOVE ln InvOLVE and LIVE ln In- VoLvEd). Tbe symbolism doesn't stop there, however. If one takes the time to examine further . . . The point, nevertheless, ls that we are Involved WITH Ufe and we are involved BY love. Life ls the most precious thing we have; love the most rewarding thing we know. Mankind ls Indeed our brother, and yes, we ARE our brothers' keepers. So then, to Frederick Perls "Bill of Rights" I would reply by quoting John Donne's "United Nations Charter": >f thy tricnda or ol •; anyman'a death a / am In- I in mankind; and th I maintain then, that we ARE Involved with manldng by virtue of our common humanity. Todeny this fact denies ourselves - our hearts, our minds — and our Uvea. Heated pools, all electric kitchens, complete utility rooms. Newly furnished 1 & 2 bedroom apts. from $105 to $125. PHONE 229-9268 THE DAILY COLLEGIAN Our assumptions - and intercultural dating One thing that all cultures pro- vlce-a cultural universal In other words-is a set of basic asr suptlons about life, Its meaning and the way It should be conducted. The process of socialization ls the process wheTebjr-these assumptions are made to seem obvious. Once acquired It Is very hard Indeed to look outside one self a d pre- celve that any other contradictory assumption Is right or bas any truth ln lt. Thus, wen «o- claUzed, one wants to do what one has to do-and one knows why. Our assuptlons explain lt. Without them we would be constantly having to make horren- questlon such things as whether we should (O first through a door, or should tb* young lady beside us? Luckily, these minor prob lems are taken care of for us by our assumptions about reality. Thus we don't have to think. And, as a philosopher once observed, •There ls nothing a man won't do to avoid thinking.* Nevertheless assumptions do have value in slropUfying our lives and reducing the Inconsequential choices to automatic decisions (although perhaps we go too far, and, as the philosopher suggests, avoid awareness of what we ara doing entirely). -very culture has different as- sumptlons-and this lt what can lead to wars Not everyculture ls entirely different however-tbere are many commonly held values (which are derived from our assumptions) within Western societies tor Instance. Again though, bow these are defined may vary from one culture to another. "Freedom" ls not quite the same thing to an American as lt ls to an EngUshman-because their experiences and their respective i affection for hla wife The other side . . • histories, are different. But there ls enough similarity tor a generally workable* agreement when one culture deals with the other. Yet some cultures seem to have some values that are not only different but almost the reverse of many Western countries. Consider for Instance the situation ln India where boys hold hands with boys and never ever hold a gin's hand. The value which defines and sanctions this behaviour Is quite the opposite of many Western countries-boy« or There Is nothing Intrinsic to support tt. Holding hands with another male does not necessarily •mean* nor make that person a "queer*. But try telling that to an "authoritarian" Westerner. And then, holding one's girlfriend's or wife's hand ln public does not make one a promiscuous, proletarian boor. But one would find lt hard to convince an Indian villager of that. To him such public display of affection Is disgusting and utterly taboo. Consequently It can be seen that our values are often discrepant because our assumptions are dlf- one ls normally called upon to risk. Probably .more dangerous than verbal Interaction (whichls, at least, more expUclt, even if based on different assumptions often) Is the process of cue-giving and receiving between a couple sharing different cultures. •Cueromunlcatlon* or'Klneeles* relationship. In «two-culture dyad tt can be almost a foreign language. Why? Because Uke everything else, communication of any sort ls predicated It is the know better than their children what ls .good for tbe family (and not necessarily good tor tbe child). Moreover, love la not an factorf^^^^^^ yoa don't know t i grammar, munlcatlon becomes Ineffective or starts to break down, the relationship wiU not last long to both will withdraw from some thing that brings no rewards, or worse, carries costs. Yet while emphasizing our Ineffective communication ai the deepest personal level, tt must also be acknowledged that we aU share ia common humanity, and Nothing else ln one's culture ls fraught with such emotional danger though than the practices of courtship. Here common assumptions are almost Imperative because lt ls a very intimate tbe time so much Is left unsaid. It ls certainly hard enough for any male or female ln their owt culture to really communicate— because they don't share exactly the same "personal" culture of their own values, beliefs and assumptions. cation ls possible. Were lt not for this we would never approach a "stranger", marriage would be a universal sentenc "" ~ -and Interethnlc Impossibility. Certain assumptions underlie every aspect of behaviour. Wlth- lt would Interfere with flUal piety. Nowadays most Chinese girls would not think to go out more than once or twice with a boy un- . less she thought seriously of him as a potential spouse. 'Dating* then- ln most of Asia, If lt occurs at all, la considered a preUml- nary to marriage. In America though, dating ls casual. There ls no commitment beyond the one date. And the next date ls not made at the end of the current on (as generally happens ln En- (Contlnued on Page 6, Col. 8) however, the assumptions of one's partner are probably more analyzed than ln any other type of Interaction. Thla ts because there Is so much at stake-our time, our emotions -and our delicate ego. We have already seen that, to an Indian, public display of affection is taboo. A boy may not kiss or even hold the hand of his girlfriend ln public (this Is assuming be even has one, tor roost, though not all, marriages tn India are arranged). Moreover, a man may not dis- Signs of our times THE ULTIMATE TRAGEDY of war is that the children suffer most. But this lovable little spastic orphan found a friend among Ban Me Thuof s, Special Services troops. Here she is being helped from the 'train* they constructed, after a ride through the town one Saturday morning. Thought for the day than euphemism, you know." —F5.C. Professor CAMPUS MUSMTKMAl Cameua ku.n_tioi-i ta • oi-aonthi. Graffiti scrawled on a field publication o^FrtanoStrt^Coiiata'a latrine in a base in a northern r'a'JJpVa'mVnt to tha Dally CalUgUa. province of South Vietnam: "Join Th. »ia*. .apraa.ed in thla m.c.- the Marines - and Invade the .ma u. "_"Mjrf«eai"W«^.»if country of your choice." Or, If you think this Is sick - how about the poster In a San Francisco advertising agency's office: "Join the Army and see the world. Meet exciting, exotic people and kill them." INTERVIEW CANCELLED? YOUR AIR FORCE IS HIRING At these typical annual salaries for Junior Officers: $ 7,000 At entry ($8,200 If you fly) 9,100 After 2 years ($10,600 if you fly) 11,200 At 3 years ($13,000 If you fly) With many sweet fringe benefits. THERE IS STILL TIME! Call «xt 2593 WITHOUT DELAY! Right now, that goes double Pick up TWO 6-paks of the King of Beers®. WHEN YOU SAY Budweiser. YOUVESAIDITALL! \
Object Description
Title | 1971_05 The Daily Collegian May 1971 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1971 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | May 20, 1971 Pg 4-5 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1971 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search |
THE DAILY COLLEGIAN 'Thuraday, May 10, 1971
Non-involvement — a
policy of self destruction
By Martyn Green
"/ do my thing, and you d
These words by Frederick S.
Perls seem an admirable philosophy - it first sight But If
we consider them a moment we
realize that tbey are espousing
nothing less than a policy of non-
Involveroent. "You do your thing
and I'U do mine," appears to be
an excellent Idea, for It allows
us the freedom to be ourselves -
or so It seems. But suppose we
see somebody ailing themselves
slowly on drugs - are we supposed to turn our heads away
and not care - because he ls
doing his thing? «Or worse still
- if we see a man viciously
beating his child, are we to turn
a deaf ear to Its screams — because he should be allowed to'do
his thing?" Should we permit a
man to drive recklessly down the
freeway, doing his "thing* Uke
mad, thereby causing a wreck that
doesn't harm HIM ln the sUghtest
- but kills three other people?
Granting him total freedom to do
his thing then, would eventually
deny others the right to do theirs.
SHORTSIGHTED
I therefore suggest that this
Ideal Is a shortsighted one - a
great theory but a poor practice.
We cannot so rashly deny our
concern for others. We cannot
say we don't want to get Involved
- we ARE Involved. If nothing
else, we are Involved.with others
Ity. This we cannot deny. We cannot forsake our commitment to
others without forsaking Ufe itself. With Ufe comes the concomittant of care, concern, empathy and Identification with others. We can't NOT be Involved-
we ARE.
And yet In America and other
western societies we are wlt-
nlal of that which we are. "If you
are ln a big city," advises Marshall McCluhan, "and you are attacked, don't shout 'Help!' -that
requires too much commitment.
Shout 'Fire!'. People can handle
something Uke that without getting Involved."
Fear of getting Involved Is not
new. Can one ever forget the Infamy of the triple stabbing of
Catherine Genovese In New York
one night In 1963? No less than
thirty-eight people heard her
screams — but none went to help
or even called the police. Their
excuse? "We didn't want to get
Involved,' they bleated pathetically.
TKRRIHLK BTKN_
This sickness Is not only confined to our society. A couple of
years ago, a party of British
university students were driving
their Jeep up a mountainous road
ln northern Norway, on their way
to do some research In Lapland.
EUROPE
OneWay
CHARTER
JET FLIGHTS
From Oakland to
I Madrid |