Oct 5, 1972 Pg. D-E |
Previous | 11 of 55 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
D THE DAILY COLLEOIAN Thuredey, October «. 1971 Pesky initiative could save coast By Keith snd Maureen Halght Alternative Features Service Proposition 20, the California Coastline Initiative, I* on* of tho** p**ky people's initiatives. Neither legislators nor corporations really Uke th* idea of cltl- tana writing their own laws - ■ they happen to r* neglected. Since California often acts na- eoael. Such actions would deprive not complex on the beach of tiny Sand Who then, does the beach be- only th* local residents of their City In Monterey. California. long to? la 11 the property of the right to uae the beach, but alao This construction would have a city or county which happens to millions of Americans who live density of 50 units per acre, the be locsted on th* shor*? Csn It Inlsnd - or do they/not hav* a highest In Monterey County, and Une «lta' coast with paint fac- 'right* to us* the coaat? the highest on the state shoreline, lories, pesticide plsnts, nuclear One graphic example of the except perhaps for San Francisco power plants, oil refineries, or counties' piecemeal 'right* la a »"d Los Angeles. The Monterey department atorea If It chooses? proposed GU-unlt apartment County Planning Com mission ZTZ al nsurance Company agents) and Amerl- Klnance Corporation f owner* and developers of the groups mad d r ty'lTa'r^renu""- nortng ha equests of govern- Letters to Editor which belong to the American people. Consequently, It finds Farmworkers don't like UFWU Utility companies, chambers of commerce, oil companies, and. work <>n o( rour,e rMl esiatedevelop*rs and Urge landowners, are all nd his or. The IU| of c„nlr,butors „ '"" "'""' and Hertrlr SoulhernCallfornla Thuredey. October S.I971 THE DAILY COLLEOIAN E Doves indignant again—how predictable * Holmes Ah Vietnam! It'a all ao predictable. All one has to do Is utter five words to the right of Ramsey Clark, and the doves rise up In righteous indignation quicker thsh you could say 'William Westmoreland.* They're rather Uke the rata that preaa a button every time the light coca on. Why, after the spat* of rebuttals to my 'bomb the dike** column, I feel )u*t Ilk* B. F. Short. Mr. Short, apparently thinking the first rebuttal Inadequate (I agree: II waa embarrassing, *ven for a dove), bethought to take me to taak Mr Short lays down some butlal. For Instance, he says that while It's ok to supply arms to a 'beleaguered people, 'there Is no merit and no Justice In fighting a war lor another country.* Oh, that's right. World War II WAS an unjust conflict. We shouldn't have fought for Britain and eaponslble fc Anthony Lewis of Times, for In- Ittle screeds from n the leading can- title of Mr. Tokyo rt critique is use- and about which there Is much misinformation. They are (IJ the history and (2) the morality of First, as Short suggest., let's The relevant p.rlod begins with in* f ■'-...a part -mutually agreed upon by Hanoi andSalgon-and the e left behind ln Ihe South herners were brought training and Indoctrl- POWs fMea •t brought any prlson- md . . . people ln the Presidential approval for private citizens to visit North Vietnam or any country with which theU.S. Is engaged In active combat was defeated ln the House of Repre- fDefeated by a vote of 229-1*1, the bill would allow a fine of $10,000 and a 10 year Jail sentence for traveling to 'hostile* nations. Even families of POWs were to be barred from such (Opponents of the bill charged last week that It was being steamrollered through the House. Laat Monday the House Internal Security Committee held a 45- mlnute hearing and voted 5-1 to approve the proposed action, thus allowing the matter to come to a quick vote ln tha closing week* Of th* congressional session. (R*p. Richard Ichord CD-Mo.) said he wlU try to get the blU revived by th* House Rules Committee.) murder and kidnapping and massacres of. entlr* villages - not isolated instances of individual brutality but officially organized slaughter. I hav* great admiration t the that had strung up an equivalent number of our tilt* In th* public squares. Roughly speaking, what the South Vietnamese suffered during the high period of terror from 1959 to 19*4 would be the equivalent of 3,000,000 or our politicians, teachera, doctors, engineers and civil servants being executed. President Elsenhower Is often quoted as saying that had the election been held the people would have overwhelmingly voted for Ho. Of course they would have. They were scsred to death to do otherwl«e. So much for the early history of the Vletnsmese war. As forthe .morality of our subsequent Intervention. I submit that the war In Vietnam was as moral a cause as Americans have ever fought for. There Is nothing Immoral about resisting totalitarianism. There are two grounds, and two grounds only, for th* agru- ment that our . intervention In Vietnam waa •Immoral.' Ftrat, to cjo*«tloo tb* morality of the those who lay all ware ar* Im- war comprls-s tho** who believe moral, rellgtoue orphlloaophlcal that 11 Is wrong only because we pacifists, ere. quite within their are shooting the wrong way, that rights to apply the designation to la, they believe that Hanoi la Vietnam. The**, however, are right. For them, the war la'Juet' people with no favorite wara: and Hanoi la the Instrument of. they condemn Arabs, Israelis, righteousness. These people are Communlat* and antl-Commu- wrong, but they are conetatent. nlata with complete Impartiality. All other arguments against The second group with standing ONE TRACH MIND malic ln nature. All m Watch out for pink dragons By Leo Trachtenberg Once upon a time there waa a after a single term. He doesn't pink dragon who at* an ugly piin- feel like a servant, public or ceaa because a black knight who otherwise. waa sent by the ogre to save her When a man imprisons hla waa frightened by the handsome political opposition, dlabanda toada In the moat surrounding the newspaper* and rules by decree, •traw hut wherein the ugly prln- you can't aay that defending hi* cess dwelled. regime Is defending democracy. Real,,,, That'/ something thl. rf^eKSSSS more" MoTer G^f D^isna ' »"" ml,"°° ,0 "° <*■»"»- more Mother Goose Disneyland nU| ,g ,„,, „„„,,„,„, or Utile Green Apples. Fact. of „,, wrejl.Ip^#rtoBfJ.lllln th* prospects of another of of on* par cent of the population and another eight-tenths of one per cent of the land folic super aoctallat. Reality. No more Martha Goose, DIcklelandorLlttleCreek Agnewa. Fact. For those fiction hounds who'll be drinking lt up it victory pajv ties In COP headquarters nationwide on Election Night-be on the lookout for pink dragons. Or lslt pink elephants? Oh, what a hang- "Who needs bike insurance? My homeowner's policy covers me, right?", 100% BICYCLE THEFT ANY QUESTIONS? a Whet co»er**j* do I r*c*iv*? A. You ere covered for THEFT (ONLY) of any Insured bicycle if at the time of the theft the bicycle is locked and chained to a stationary object OR protected by an operative end approved electronic warning device, which was actuated prior to the time of theft. Theft of any pert of a bicycle it NOT covered. Q. Aren't bicycles covered under as low as $10 PER YEAR A. Yes, but coverage is usually subject to deductibles of $50 to $100. This program provides THEFT coverage with no deductible or depreciation. Coverage amount is the purchase price of bicycles of less than one year old oc.appraised value of bicycles over one year old. A. First you must report the theft within twenty-four hours to your local police. Then, immediately complete the claim notice provided with each coverage policy issued end mail it to All-Star Bicycle Theft Claims Oept. with a copy of th* police report and a copy of your original bill of tale. (On a used bicycle, a written appraisal by your bicycle dealer it required es proof of value in addition to the claim notice and police report.) O What if th* bicycle it but The recent r«*h ol bicycle thefta has caused many owners to take a second look at their insurance protection. The findings ere not promising. A typical homeowner's coverage usually carries a SS0 or $100 deductible. Further deductions Include depreciation and premium coat*, resulting In ■ minimal settlement-scent comfort for the loss of a valuable bike. When you're covered by a Ali-Star Bicycle Theft Pollcy.rhowever. you'll receive 100% of your loss: the full purchase price of your new bicycle, the full appraised value of used. And promptly. All valid claims ere paid within 30 days, end the premiums can be lea* than $1.00 a month. • "*> ♦ Your bike deserves 100% coverage, and your premiums deserve to be the lowest, right? Write I A. In the event of recovery in a damaged condition, the bicycle shall be restored to its undamaged condition immediately prior to lota, or the Insured amount shall be paid to the Insured at the option of the Company. . a How should I enrhre et the true bicycle value? _^ A. New bicycle* - Exact purchasn price in- original bill of tale as proof of value. Used bicycles - Ask your local dealer to give his written appraisal of the value of the bicycle. ..i^plleitJsaialMarallaeitrtyserlacalkleycl* a Who is th* in»ur*r of thii program? A. Ail-Star Insurance Corporation. Milwaukee, a subsidiary of Pott Corp. of Appleton, VVrsconsm, a publicly hi"
Object Description
Title | 1972_10 The Daily Collegian October 1972 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1972 |
Description | Daily (except weekends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | Oct 5, 1972 Pg. D-E |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1972 |
Description | Daily (except weekends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | D THE DAILY COLLEOIAN Thuredey, October «. 1971 Pesky initiative could save coast By Keith snd Maureen Halght Alternative Features Service Proposition 20, the California Coastline Initiative, I* on* of tho** p**ky people's initiatives. Neither legislators nor corporations really Uke th* idea of cltl- tana writing their own laws - ■ they happen to r* neglected. Since California often acts na- eoael. Such actions would deprive not complex on the beach of tiny Sand Who then, does the beach be- only th* local residents of their City In Monterey. California. long to? la 11 the property of the right to uae the beach, but alao This construction would have a city or county which happens to millions of Americans who live density of 50 units per acre, the be locsted on th* shor*? Csn It Inlsnd - or do they/not hav* a highest In Monterey County, and Une «lta' coast with paint fac- 'right* to us* the coaat? the highest on the state shoreline, lories, pesticide plsnts, nuclear One graphic example of the except perhaps for San Francisco power plants, oil refineries, or counties' piecemeal 'right* la a »"d Los Angeles. The Monterey department atorea If It chooses? proposed GU-unlt apartment County Planning Com mission ZTZ al nsurance Company agents) and Amerl- Klnance Corporation f owner* and developers of the groups mad d r ty'lTa'r^renu""- nortng ha equests of govern- Letters to Editor which belong to the American people. Consequently, It finds Farmworkers don't like UFWU Utility companies, chambers of commerce, oil companies, and. work <>n o( rour,e rMl esiatedevelop*rs and Urge landowners, are all nd his or. The IU| of c„nlr,butors „ '"" "'""' and Hertrlr SoulhernCallfornla Thuredey. October S.I971 THE DAILY COLLEOIAN E Doves indignant again—how predictable * Holmes Ah Vietnam! It'a all ao predictable. All one has to do Is utter five words to the right of Ramsey Clark, and the doves rise up In righteous indignation quicker thsh you could say 'William Westmoreland.* They're rather Uke the rata that preaa a button every time the light coca on. Why, after the spat* of rebuttals to my 'bomb the dike** column, I feel )u*t Ilk* B. F. Short. Mr. Short, apparently thinking the first rebuttal Inadequate (I agree: II waa embarrassing, *ven for a dove), bethought to take me to taak Mr Short lays down some butlal. For Instance, he says that while It's ok to supply arms to a 'beleaguered people, 'there Is no merit and no Justice In fighting a war lor another country.* Oh, that's right. World War II WAS an unjust conflict. We shouldn't have fought for Britain and eaponslble fc Anthony Lewis of Times, for In- Ittle screeds from n the leading can- title of Mr. Tokyo rt critique is use- and about which there Is much misinformation. They are (IJ the history and (2) the morality of First, as Short suggest., let's The relevant p.rlod begins with in* f ■'-...a part -mutually agreed upon by Hanoi andSalgon-and the e left behind ln Ihe South herners were brought training and Indoctrl- POWs fMea •t brought any prlson- md . . . people ln the Presidential approval for private citizens to visit North Vietnam or any country with which theU.S. Is engaged In active combat was defeated ln the House of Repre- fDefeated by a vote of 229-1*1, the bill would allow a fine of $10,000 and a 10 year Jail sentence for traveling to 'hostile* nations. Even families of POWs were to be barred from such (Opponents of the bill charged last week that It was being steamrollered through the House. Laat Monday the House Internal Security Committee held a 45- mlnute hearing and voted 5-1 to approve the proposed action, thus allowing the matter to come to a quick vote ln tha closing week* Of th* congressional session. (R*p. Richard Ichord CD-Mo.) said he wlU try to get the blU revived by th* House Rules Committee.) murder and kidnapping and massacres of. entlr* villages - not isolated instances of individual brutality but officially organized slaughter. I hav* great admiration t the that had strung up an equivalent number of our tilt* In th* public squares. Roughly speaking, what the South Vietnamese suffered during the high period of terror from 1959 to 19*4 would be the equivalent of 3,000,000 or our politicians, teachera, doctors, engineers and civil servants being executed. President Elsenhower Is often quoted as saying that had the election been held the people would have overwhelmingly voted for Ho. Of course they would have. They were scsred to death to do otherwl«e. So much for the early history of the Vletnsmese war. As forthe .morality of our subsequent Intervention. I submit that the war In Vietnam was as moral a cause as Americans have ever fought for. There Is nothing Immoral about resisting totalitarianism. There are two grounds, and two grounds only, for th* agru- ment that our . intervention In Vietnam waa •Immoral.' Ftrat, to cjo*«tloo tb* morality of the those who lay all ware ar* Im- war comprls-s tho** who believe moral, rellgtoue orphlloaophlcal that 11 Is wrong only because we pacifists, ere. quite within their are shooting the wrong way, that rights to apply the designation to la, they believe that Hanoi la Vietnam. The**, however, are right. For them, the war la'Juet' people with no favorite wara: and Hanoi la the Instrument of. they condemn Arabs, Israelis, righteousness. These people are Communlat* and antl-Commu- wrong, but they are conetatent. nlata with complete Impartiality. All other arguments against The second group with standing ONE TRACH MIND malic ln nature. All m Watch out for pink dragons By Leo Trachtenberg Once upon a time there waa a after a single term. He doesn't pink dragon who at* an ugly piin- feel like a servant, public or ceaa because a black knight who otherwise. waa sent by the ogre to save her When a man imprisons hla waa frightened by the handsome political opposition, dlabanda toada In the moat surrounding the newspaper* and rules by decree, •traw hut wherein the ugly prln- you can't aay that defending hi* cess dwelled. regime Is defending democracy. Real,,,, That'/ something thl. rf^eKSSSS more" MoTer G^f D^isna ' »"" ml,"°° ,0 "° <*■»"»- more Mother Goose Disneyland nU| ,g ,„,, „„„,,„,„, or Utile Green Apples. Fact. of „,, wrejl.Ip^#rtoBfJ.lllln th* prospects of another of of on* par cent of the population and another eight-tenths of one per cent of the land folic super aoctallat. Reality. No more Martha Goose, DIcklelandorLlttleCreek Agnewa. Fact. For those fiction hounds who'll be drinking lt up it victory pajv ties In COP headquarters nationwide on Election Night-be on the lookout for pink dragons. Or lslt pink elephants? Oh, what a hang- "Who needs bike insurance? My homeowner's policy covers me, right?", 100% BICYCLE THEFT ANY QUESTIONS? a Whet co»er**j* do I r*c*iv*? A. You ere covered for THEFT (ONLY) of any Insured bicycle if at the time of the theft the bicycle is locked and chained to a stationary object OR protected by an operative end approved electronic warning device, which was actuated prior to the time of theft. Theft of any pert of a bicycle it NOT covered. Q. Aren't bicycles covered under as low as $10 PER YEAR A. Yes, but coverage is usually subject to deductibles of $50 to $100. This program provides THEFT coverage with no deductible or depreciation. Coverage amount is the purchase price of bicycles of less than one year old oc.appraised value of bicycles over one year old. A. First you must report the theft within twenty-four hours to your local police. Then, immediately complete the claim notice provided with each coverage policy issued end mail it to All-Star Bicycle Theft Claims Oept. with a copy of th* police report and a copy of your original bill of tale. (On a used bicycle, a written appraisal by your bicycle dealer it required es proof of value in addition to the claim notice and police report.) O What if th* bicycle it but The recent r«*h ol bicycle thefta has caused many owners to take a second look at their insurance protection. The findings ere not promising. A typical homeowner's coverage usually carries a SS0 or $100 deductible. Further deductions Include depreciation and premium coat*, resulting In ■ minimal settlement-scent comfort for the loss of a valuable bike. When you're covered by a Ali-Star Bicycle Theft Pollcy.rhowever. you'll receive 100% of your loss: the full purchase price of your new bicycle, the full appraised value of used. And promptly. All valid claims ere paid within 30 days, end the premiums can be lea* than $1.00 a month. • "*> ♦ Your bike deserves 100% coverage, and your premiums deserve to be the lowest, right? Write I A. In the event of recovery in a damaged condition, the bicycle shall be restored to its undamaged condition immediately prior to lota, or the Insured amount shall be paid to the Insured at the option of the Company. . a How should I enrhre et the true bicycle value? _^ A. New bicycle* - Exact purchasn price in- original bill of tale as proof of value. Used bicycles - Ask your local dealer to give his written appraisal of the value of the bicycle. ..i^plleitJsaialMarallaeitrtyserlacalkleycl* a Who is th* in»ur*r of thii program? A. Ail-Star Insurance Corporation. Milwaukee, a subsidiary of Pott Corp. of Appleton, VVrsconsm, a publicly hi" |