May 5, 1969 Pg. 2- May 5, 1969 La Pluma Pg. 1 |
Previous | 8 of 49 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
THE DAILY COLLEGIAN . Board of Pubs (Continued from Page 1) •We aren't on a level of un¬ derstanding where we can work together," Davis said. "We can¬ not work together until we can understand each other ... We have to Inform you what Is hap¬ pening today (through a separate publication)." The CoUeglan has been writ¬ ing as an authority on us," Davis later said. "We want to be able Schyler R eh art, non-voting board member and adviser to the Collegian, said that the papers would be an "act of segregation In which (the groups would) po¬ larize black and brown opinions' and would not satisfactorily reach the audience the groups desire. He said the only successful way Is to Incorporate from within. He was also concerned with pre- Who said... "First Things First?" Wc don'l know but we agree with the idea. And one of the first things you should do while you're young is check into your life in. —you qualify for the BENEFAC¬ TOR; the life insurance policy crcjlod for college students. i less I) '. you .1 preferred risk. The BENEFAC¬ TOR is completely adaptable to your individual needs, all through your life. It was created by College Life ... the original and only life insurance company serving col¬ lege men only. You should take time now to listen to your College Life rep¬ resentative. It could be the most important conversation you'll ever have. BOB REESE P. O. BOX 5112 Phone 224-3558 and go through channels," Davis said. «. . . (and) lt could erupt Into a San Francisco State Col¬ lege and If that ts what lt takes, then lt will erupt." Davis also said (hat If black given representation on the Stu¬ dent Senate last year as the two groups requested, the grape boy¬ cott Incident and "some of the ac- votlng, Ra- avold It (a SFSC crisis) through the paper, we know we can. . . What we ask is cooperation. . . Why not give us a chance?" During the discussion Merrell said that he would be willing to meet with heads of the Chicano and Black students to see if they could not come up with an agree¬ ment whereby separate publica¬ tion would not be necessary. He said that he was committed to giving day-to-day coverage of Black and Chicano news and that he wanted 1 Merrell ii :o be written by mlrez agreed with nclple. They said they would meet with him and a phasing out of the minority pa¬ pers might be possible If he pro¬ vided adequate, ln-depth cover- The board also passed a pro- Tnfi Rode0 Team ^me home posal asking that members ofthe ,«-»-. Collegia,, a s . 1 s t the minority wlth hl«n »°lDt honorfi ln reCelU staffs with the technical news- competition at the Poly Royal, papering. the annual rodeo and horse show Rodeo team wins high point honors JUNE GRADS - have you checked your dictionary* lately for the definitions of: hence. 6. a lifework; profession; occupation .... "(Webster's New World Dictionary, College Edition, 1966) REVENUE OFFICER Candidates available for employment in June will be con¬ sidered for entry into a planned training program which assignments in tax law compliance. Starling salaries (ef¬ fective July 1969) range from $7412 to $8404 per year. Excellent fringe benefits include relocation expenses.Test¬ ing and interviews will be conducted by IRS Recruiters who will be on campus May 8, 1969. See your Placement Officer Internal Revenue Service An equal opportunity employer sponsored by the California Poly¬ technic College at San Luis The horse show team took championship honors over 12 col¬ leges ln weekend competition. Individual winners ln rodeo competition Include DonAwbrey, first ln bareback riding and fourth In team roping; Butch Jones, first ln bulldogglng; Claudia Baronl, fourth ln barrel racing; Llbby Dlrlto, fourth In goat lying; Sandy Jennings, fourth ln goat tying, and Bonnie competition were Chris Vincent, first ln western equatatlon and first ln stock horse class com¬ petition; Jimmy Nunes, fifth ln Jumping; Debbie Van Buren, first ln western pleasure and fourth ln oni, fifth In weslern pleasure. Don Tucker placed ln several categories and was named high point Individual ln college and open competition. FSC grad wins first prize for technical paper on heat James Wright, a graduate of January and now works for Fresno State College, was re¬ Hughes Aircraft Company ln cently awarded a $100 first prize FuUerton, Calif. He Is a graduate for his technical paper presenta¬ of Roosevelt High School ln tion at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' (ASME) The title of his paper was Regional Student Conference, Pa¬ •Effect of Radiant Heat Loss on cific Central Section. The host Heat Flux through a Roof." He school was the University of Ne¬ plans to enter lt again at the ASME vada, in Reno. national contest this November ln Wright received his degree in Mechanical Engineering last In addition to FSC and Nevada, five other schools participated San Jose State, Sacramento State, (he Universities of CaUfornla at Berkeley and Davis, and theUnl- verslty of Santa Clara. Two engineering students from FSC accompanied Wright to the conference. They were Dan Hlb- ler and William O'ConneU. As for Wright's future, he hopes to enter UCLA this faU to do graduate work ln Engineering. ■ ■ fatal*, poturr. ^afJOaHm WSTAIB „t 235 N. F.llo. La Semana de la Raza Bronce y El Cinco de Mayo Every fifth of May Puebla, the original "City of the Angels" ln the Western Hemisphere awakens to a glorious day, a day which has won her the proud name of "Puebla la herolca." For this is the commemoration ^ of the Balalla del Clnco de Mayo, May 5, 1862, when Puebla repulsed a French attack. Around eleven ln the morning the school children of Puebla, decked out ln their unlformes de gala (dress uniforms) decorated with Identifying ribbons, march for four hours in a five mile long parade through the center of the city. When the parade reaches the zocalo (central plaza), the units of the various schools march past the state and municipal officials and salute them. The rest of the day Is spent In a grand fiesta with many of the citizens gaily dressed in regional costumes, while bands play throughout the city. There Is dancing ln the zocalo and other plazas. At ten ln the evening, (he "combate de flores" (the flower battle, an ancient Aztec tradition) takes place. •People throng to the zocalo and adjoining streets throw¬ ing flowers at each other and presenting bouquets to friends and strangers alike. Later, there are many glittering private parties to cap the festivities. During t I day, the Mexican Army stages a Cerro de Guadalupe, atop which star historical museum, which was the c Throughout the Mexican Nation similar events take place; and, ln the ancient Aztec village of Penon (the rock), In (he suburbs of Mexico City, a classic play Is enacted with a cast of public officials, soldiers, and ;. Not only does the long drama follow closely ts, but lt contains long quotations from the various diplomatic pronouncements and treaties which preceeded and followed the battle. s One may well ask why all the festivities, and thereby hangs a glorious and interesting tale of Intrigue, ad¬ venture, derrlng-do, and heroic patriotism. From 1858 to 1861, Mexico was wracked by a sanguinary and de¬ structive civil war, the Guerra de la Reforma or Guerra de Tres Anos. The conflict was a showdown between the Jacobin radicals who called themselves puros and the ultraconservatlve religious elements. They were all Catholics, but they disagreed violently on the relations between Church and State, as well as on the nature of the State Itself. The Liberals (as the puros were officially called), favored a federalized republic and rejected their Indo-Spanlsh-Cathollc culture ln favor of the Anglo- oriented-Protestant one of the United States. The Con¬ servatives preferred a unitary republic on the French model or a recreation of the Spanish monarchlal state, as well as the Europeonlzatlon of Mexican culture. To bring about their ends, both sides courted foreign Inter¬ vention: the Liberals that of the United States, the Con¬ servatives that of France. At the conclusion of the Guerra de la Reforma, which the Liberals won with the aid of the United States, Pres¬ ident Benito Juarez surveyed the sorry state of his coun¬ try, drained physically and emotionally and.utterly devastated by a fratricidal war. Small surprise, then, that President Juarez declared a two-year moratorium on the payment of Mexico's foreign debt. Although the decision was dictated by absolute necessity, lt was catas¬ trophic, for lt furnished a pretext for foreign I tlon. The time was propitious, for the United States, it¬ self embroiled ln the bloody struggle between the Union and Confederate forces, was in no position (o enforce the Monroe Doctrine which not only decried intervention by non-American powers, but specifically banned the further extension of the monarchical system lnAmerlca. Napoleon m, Emperor of the French, had long dreamed of a Catholic Latin American Empire which would coun¬ teract the,Protestant Anglo-oriented United States. Also, he was Influenced by the dazzling vision of Mexican riches dangled before his eyes by such Mexican exiles as the ex-Liberal General Juan Almonte, the royalist Jose Maria Gutierrez Estrada, and the ambitious Jose V.nuol Hidalgo who had distinguished himself against the American Invaders at the Battle of Churubuseo in 1847. He was also Influenced by his bastard half-brother, the Due de Momy, who was a partner of J. B. Jecker, Napoleon H prevailed on Britain and Spain to agree on forcibly pressing their respective claims against Mexico by means of a Joint diplomatic mission backed by a pow¬ erful punitive expedition ... a form of International Intimidation of small powers by large ones commonly referred to In diplomatic and military circles as "show¬ ing the flag." When Indulged ln between major powers, lt Is known less euphemistically as "rattling the sword." His plan was ratified officially In the London Convention on October 31, 1861. By this agreement the contracting parties pledged themselves to respect the territorial In¬ tegrity of the Republic of Mexico. There were no pro¬ visions for changing Mexico's form of government. On January 9, 1862, the tripartite envoys, Count Dubois de Saligny, General Juan Prim, and Sir Charles Wyke met at Vera Cruz to discussthelrclalms.lt soon became clear that Spain and Britain's claims were Just, whereas France demanded the honoring of the Jecker bonds (the Due de Momy was to get thirty per cent) and an addition¬ al twelve million pesos ln cash. France wanted no ques¬ tions asked. She was unwilling or unable to furnish valid proof. Nevertheless, President Juarez and his representa¬ tives treated the tripartite expedition with courtesy and consideration. Not only did he allow them tooccupy Vera Cruz unopposed but, by the Treaty of La Doledad, al¬ lowed the foreign troops to move from the oppressive heat of the disease-ridden "Hot Land" to the healthier climate of the Mexican Plateau, near Puebla. The allies agreed to retreat to Vera Cruz, should 1 France's exorbitant demands and the rudely Inflexible attitude of Dubois de Saligny, who was a stooge of the Due de Morny, soon caused a personality clash between the French envoy and General Prim. Sir Charles Wyke sided with the Spanish general. Tempers reached the breaking point, when the French landed General Almonte and other Mexican Imperial agents to engage ln sub¬ versive activities under the protection of the flag of France. At the urging of their representatives, Spain and Britain recalled their expeditionary forces. Napoleon III then ordered the Commander ln Chief of his Invading army, General Charles F. Latrllle, Count of Laurencez, to take Mexico City and overthrow the Government of Mexico. On this occasion, as ln almost every instance ln the French Intervention ln Mexico, France forgot her vaunted devotion to honor. General Laurencez violated the treaty of Soledad and marched directly towards Puebla, where an army under General Ignaclo Zaragoza blocked the way to the capital. Juarez's choice of General Zaragoza to repel the French Invasion was both surprising and intuitive. He might have selected General Jose Lopez Uraga, for ex¬ ample, a trained soldier.of great technical knowledge and proven skill since 1947, He knew European military strategy and had distinguished himself ln action during the War of Reform. General zaragoza, on the o was a brilliant but untutored guerilla tactician from Coa- huila. However, no one knew the military ability and the limitations of the Mexican soldier better, or had greater confidence ln his heroic endurance and courage. It Is Interesting that Zaragoza ln addressing his unpaid, underfed, poorly clolhed and armed troops never spoke of winning or dying heroically, as Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana often had. Zaragoza spoke confidently only of total triumph. General Laurencez, on the contrary, had formed a poor concept of the Mexican soldier. When the bedraggled men of the Conservative guerilla leader, General Lorenzo Marquez, straggled Into bis camp, the French general noted they were barefooted, half-naked, and Ill-armed. Never having seen them ln action, he concluded that Mexico could easily be conquered with French regulars. So contemptuous was he of Mexican military ability, so sure that the Conservative and deeply religious citizens of Puebla would betray the army of the radical government of Juarez, that he decided on a frontal attack of the two hills where General Zaragoza had deployed his men, Cerro de Guadalupe and Cerro de Loreto. Also, Lurencez could not know that the general ln his twenties who led the flanking attack for Zaragoza was the military genius who would eventually destroy the armies of Emperor Maximilian. His name was Gen¬ eral Porflrlo Diaz, and this was his first major com¬ mand. Before the battle, General Laurencez wrote bis government: "We have over the Mexicans such a super¬ iority of race, organization, discipline, morality, and high Ideals that even now, at the head of our valiant six thousand soldiers, I am the master of Mexico." Famous "General Laurencez, commanding 6000 well-trained and handsomely uniformed dragoons and foot soldiers, was given orders to occupy Mexico City. On the path of his march to the capital was Puebla, defended by 4000 Mexicans armed with I antiquated guns—many of which had seen service at the battle of Waterloo fifty years before, and had been bought _t a bargain by Mexico's ambassador to London back ln 182S. Commander of Puebla's forces was Ignaclo Zaragoza, an amateur ln tactical warfare, as were most of his officers, but a seasoned warrior in guerrilla fighting. Laurencez, to show his contempt for (hat ragtag army, called for a charge up the middle of the Mexican defenses at Zara¬ goza's most strongly fortified position. The charge carried his cavalry through soggy ditches, over a crumbling adobe ValL..and up the steep slopes ofthe Cerro de Guadalupe. Bui their drive petered out before reaching Its objective, and over one thousand Frenchmen were left sprawled on'.he field, dead or dying. Laurencez paid for his contempt. The Mexican army held, and then Zaragoza led a counter-attack that drove Laurencez back to Orizaba and, after a short reprieve, attacked him again and drove the remnants of his army to the coast. This was the first time French troops had met defeat ln nearly half a century, and lt was handed them not by a major power of Europe but by the pen¬ niless, war-torn republic of Mexico. This battle for Puebla, fought on May 5, is yearly commemorated ln Mexico by a national holiday, and there Is hardly a Mexican village, town, or city that does not call its main street Clnco de Mayo." But the Cinco de Mayo did more than give Mexicans their most glorious national holiday. A Mexican his¬ tory text comments on its significance as follows: •The victory of the Mexican Army ln the Battle of Clnco de Mayo had far-reaching consequences, national as well as International. With regard to the national consequences, the belief that the French were Invincible in war was destroyed, a belief the Conservative traitors themselves had used to demoralize the defenders of the nation. Furthermore the victory made the entire nation thrill with enthusiasm and patriotism, thus encouraging the Mexican people to continue their struggle against tne Invader without nagging..By this victory, the Mexican Army also gained an additional year ln which to reinforce and reorganize Itself, forming new military cadres, in which almost all the political elements of the nation were repre- As regards the International consequences, the defeat of the French had resounding effects ln Europe, tarnishing the brilliance of Napoleon Ill's prestige, enhancing the honorable posture of the Spanish and British envoys, destroying the slander spread there by the Conserva¬ tives that the Juarez government had no bashingl.. furthermore, this Mexican victory admirably prevented an effective alliance between Napoleon and the Confederate States ln the Civil War of the United States, which could possibly have changed the ending of that struggle. A historian says that on the Clnco de Mayo Zaragoza defended at Puebla the Integrity of the Mexican Father¬ land and the North American Federation." (C. Gonzales Blackaller and L. Guevara Ramirez, Slntesls de his- toria de Mexico, p. 366). Mexican Americans, then, have a double Incentive to cry proudly, "Viva el Clnco deMayo!" And other Ameri¬ cans, ragardless of national origins, have reason to Join them. J. C. Canalea
Object Description
Title | 1969_05 The Daily Collegian May 1969 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1969 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | May 5, 1969 Pg. 2- May 5, 1969 La Pluma Pg. 1 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1969 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | THE DAILY COLLEGIAN . Board of Pubs (Continued from Page 1) •We aren't on a level of un¬ derstanding where we can work together," Davis said. "We can¬ not work together until we can understand each other ... We have to Inform you what Is hap¬ pening today (through a separate publication)." The CoUeglan has been writ¬ ing as an authority on us," Davis later said. "We want to be able Schyler R eh art, non-voting board member and adviser to the Collegian, said that the papers would be an "act of segregation In which (the groups would) po¬ larize black and brown opinions' and would not satisfactorily reach the audience the groups desire. He said the only successful way Is to Incorporate from within. He was also concerned with pre- Who said... "First Things First?" Wc don'l know but we agree with the idea. And one of the first things you should do while you're young is check into your life in. —you qualify for the BENEFAC¬ TOR; the life insurance policy crcjlod for college students. i less I) '. you .1 preferred risk. The BENEFAC¬ TOR is completely adaptable to your individual needs, all through your life. It was created by College Life ... the original and only life insurance company serving col¬ lege men only. You should take time now to listen to your College Life rep¬ resentative. It could be the most important conversation you'll ever have. BOB REESE P. O. BOX 5112 Phone 224-3558 and go through channels," Davis said. «. . . (and) lt could erupt Into a San Francisco State Col¬ lege and If that ts what lt takes, then lt will erupt." Davis also said (hat If black given representation on the Stu¬ dent Senate last year as the two groups requested, the grape boy¬ cott Incident and "some of the ac- votlng, Ra- avold It (a SFSC crisis) through the paper, we know we can. . . What we ask is cooperation. . . Why not give us a chance?" During the discussion Merrell said that he would be willing to meet with heads of the Chicano and Black students to see if they could not come up with an agree¬ ment whereby separate publica¬ tion would not be necessary. He said that he was committed to giving day-to-day coverage of Black and Chicano news and that he wanted 1 Merrell ii :o be written by mlrez agreed with nclple. They said they would meet with him and a phasing out of the minority pa¬ pers might be possible If he pro¬ vided adequate, ln-depth cover- The board also passed a pro- Tnfi Rode0 Team ^me home posal asking that members ofthe ,«-»-. Collegia,, a s . 1 s t the minority wlth hl«n »°lDt honorfi ln reCelU staffs with the technical news- competition at the Poly Royal, papering. the annual rodeo and horse show Rodeo team wins high point honors JUNE GRADS - have you checked your dictionary* lately for the definitions of: hence. 6. a lifework; profession; occupation .... "(Webster's New World Dictionary, College Edition, 1966) REVENUE OFFICER Candidates available for employment in June will be con¬ sidered for entry into a planned training program which assignments in tax law compliance. Starling salaries (ef¬ fective July 1969) range from $7412 to $8404 per year. Excellent fringe benefits include relocation expenses.Test¬ ing and interviews will be conducted by IRS Recruiters who will be on campus May 8, 1969. See your Placement Officer Internal Revenue Service An equal opportunity employer sponsored by the California Poly¬ technic College at San Luis The horse show team took championship honors over 12 col¬ leges ln weekend competition. Individual winners ln rodeo competition Include DonAwbrey, first ln bareback riding and fourth In team roping; Butch Jones, first ln bulldogglng; Claudia Baronl, fourth ln barrel racing; Llbby Dlrlto, fourth In goat lying; Sandy Jennings, fourth ln goat tying, and Bonnie competition were Chris Vincent, first ln western equatatlon and first ln stock horse class com¬ petition; Jimmy Nunes, fifth ln Jumping; Debbie Van Buren, first ln western pleasure and fourth ln oni, fifth In weslern pleasure. Don Tucker placed ln several categories and was named high point Individual ln college and open competition. FSC grad wins first prize for technical paper on heat James Wright, a graduate of January and now works for Fresno State College, was re¬ Hughes Aircraft Company ln cently awarded a $100 first prize FuUerton, Calif. He Is a graduate for his technical paper presenta¬ of Roosevelt High School ln tion at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' (ASME) The title of his paper was Regional Student Conference, Pa¬ •Effect of Radiant Heat Loss on cific Central Section. The host Heat Flux through a Roof." He school was the University of Ne¬ plans to enter lt again at the ASME vada, in Reno. national contest this November ln Wright received his degree in Mechanical Engineering last In addition to FSC and Nevada, five other schools participated San Jose State, Sacramento State, (he Universities of CaUfornla at Berkeley and Davis, and theUnl- verslty of Santa Clara. Two engineering students from FSC accompanied Wright to the conference. They were Dan Hlb- ler and William O'ConneU. As for Wright's future, he hopes to enter UCLA this faU to do graduate work ln Engineering. ■ ■ fatal*, poturr. ^afJOaHm WSTAIB „t 235 N. F.llo. La Semana de la Raza Bronce y El Cinco de Mayo Every fifth of May Puebla, the original "City of the Angels" ln the Western Hemisphere awakens to a glorious day, a day which has won her the proud name of "Puebla la herolca." For this is the commemoration ^ of the Balalla del Clnco de Mayo, May 5, 1862, when Puebla repulsed a French attack. Around eleven ln the morning the school children of Puebla, decked out ln their unlformes de gala (dress uniforms) decorated with Identifying ribbons, march for four hours in a five mile long parade through the center of the city. When the parade reaches the zocalo (central plaza), the units of the various schools march past the state and municipal officials and salute them. The rest of the day Is spent In a grand fiesta with many of the citizens gaily dressed in regional costumes, while bands play throughout the city. There Is dancing ln the zocalo and other plazas. At ten ln the evening, (he "combate de flores" (the flower battle, an ancient Aztec tradition) takes place. •People throng to the zocalo and adjoining streets throw¬ ing flowers at each other and presenting bouquets to friends and strangers alike. Later, there are many glittering private parties to cap the festivities. During t I day, the Mexican Army stages a Cerro de Guadalupe, atop which star historical museum, which was the c Throughout the Mexican Nation similar events take place; and, ln the ancient Aztec village of Penon (the rock), In (he suburbs of Mexico City, a classic play Is enacted with a cast of public officials, soldiers, and ;. Not only does the long drama follow closely ts, but lt contains long quotations from the various diplomatic pronouncements and treaties which preceeded and followed the battle. s One may well ask why all the festivities, and thereby hangs a glorious and interesting tale of Intrigue, ad¬ venture, derrlng-do, and heroic patriotism. From 1858 to 1861, Mexico was wracked by a sanguinary and de¬ structive civil war, the Guerra de la Reforma or Guerra de Tres Anos. The conflict was a showdown between the Jacobin radicals who called themselves puros and the ultraconservatlve religious elements. They were all Catholics, but they disagreed violently on the relations between Church and State, as well as on the nature of the State Itself. The Liberals (as the puros were officially called), favored a federalized republic and rejected their Indo-Spanlsh-Cathollc culture ln favor of the Anglo- oriented-Protestant one of the United States. The Con¬ servatives preferred a unitary republic on the French model or a recreation of the Spanish monarchlal state, as well as the Europeonlzatlon of Mexican culture. To bring about their ends, both sides courted foreign Inter¬ vention: the Liberals that of the United States, the Con¬ servatives that of France. At the conclusion of the Guerra de la Reforma, which the Liberals won with the aid of the United States, Pres¬ ident Benito Juarez surveyed the sorry state of his coun¬ try, drained physically and emotionally and.utterly devastated by a fratricidal war. Small surprise, then, that President Juarez declared a two-year moratorium on the payment of Mexico's foreign debt. Although the decision was dictated by absolute necessity, lt was catas¬ trophic, for lt furnished a pretext for foreign I tlon. The time was propitious, for the United States, it¬ self embroiled ln the bloody struggle between the Union and Confederate forces, was in no position (o enforce the Monroe Doctrine which not only decried intervention by non-American powers, but specifically banned the further extension of the monarchical system lnAmerlca. Napoleon m, Emperor of the French, had long dreamed of a Catholic Latin American Empire which would coun¬ teract the,Protestant Anglo-oriented United States. Also, he was Influenced by the dazzling vision of Mexican riches dangled before his eyes by such Mexican exiles as the ex-Liberal General Juan Almonte, the royalist Jose Maria Gutierrez Estrada, and the ambitious Jose V.nuol Hidalgo who had distinguished himself against the American Invaders at the Battle of Churubuseo in 1847. He was also Influenced by his bastard half-brother, the Due de Momy, who was a partner of J. B. Jecker, Napoleon H prevailed on Britain and Spain to agree on forcibly pressing their respective claims against Mexico by means of a Joint diplomatic mission backed by a pow¬ erful punitive expedition ... a form of International Intimidation of small powers by large ones commonly referred to In diplomatic and military circles as "show¬ ing the flag." When Indulged ln between major powers, lt Is known less euphemistically as "rattling the sword." His plan was ratified officially In the London Convention on October 31, 1861. By this agreement the contracting parties pledged themselves to respect the territorial In¬ tegrity of the Republic of Mexico. There were no pro¬ visions for changing Mexico's form of government. On January 9, 1862, the tripartite envoys, Count Dubois de Saligny, General Juan Prim, and Sir Charles Wyke met at Vera Cruz to discussthelrclalms.lt soon became clear that Spain and Britain's claims were Just, whereas France demanded the honoring of the Jecker bonds (the Due de Momy was to get thirty per cent) and an addition¬ al twelve million pesos ln cash. France wanted no ques¬ tions asked. She was unwilling or unable to furnish valid proof. Nevertheless, President Juarez and his representa¬ tives treated the tripartite expedition with courtesy and consideration. Not only did he allow them tooccupy Vera Cruz unopposed but, by the Treaty of La Doledad, al¬ lowed the foreign troops to move from the oppressive heat of the disease-ridden "Hot Land" to the healthier climate of the Mexican Plateau, near Puebla. The allies agreed to retreat to Vera Cruz, should 1 France's exorbitant demands and the rudely Inflexible attitude of Dubois de Saligny, who was a stooge of the Due de Morny, soon caused a personality clash between the French envoy and General Prim. Sir Charles Wyke sided with the Spanish general. Tempers reached the breaking point, when the French landed General Almonte and other Mexican Imperial agents to engage ln sub¬ versive activities under the protection of the flag of France. At the urging of their representatives, Spain and Britain recalled their expeditionary forces. Napoleon III then ordered the Commander ln Chief of his Invading army, General Charles F. Latrllle, Count of Laurencez, to take Mexico City and overthrow the Government of Mexico. On this occasion, as ln almost every instance ln the French Intervention ln Mexico, France forgot her vaunted devotion to honor. General Laurencez violated the treaty of Soledad and marched directly towards Puebla, where an army under General Ignaclo Zaragoza blocked the way to the capital. Juarez's choice of General Zaragoza to repel the French Invasion was both surprising and intuitive. He might have selected General Jose Lopez Uraga, for ex¬ ample, a trained soldier.of great technical knowledge and proven skill since 1947, He knew European military strategy and had distinguished himself ln action during the War of Reform. General zaragoza, on the o was a brilliant but untutored guerilla tactician from Coa- huila. However, no one knew the military ability and the limitations of the Mexican soldier better, or had greater confidence ln his heroic endurance and courage. It Is Interesting that Zaragoza ln addressing his unpaid, underfed, poorly clolhed and armed troops never spoke of winning or dying heroically, as Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana often had. Zaragoza spoke confidently only of total triumph. General Laurencez, on the contrary, had formed a poor concept of the Mexican soldier. When the bedraggled men of the Conservative guerilla leader, General Lorenzo Marquez, straggled Into bis camp, the French general noted they were barefooted, half-naked, and Ill-armed. Never having seen them ln action, he concluded that Mexico could easily be conquered with French regulars. So contemptuous was he of Mexican military ability, so sure that the Conservative and deeply religious citizens of Puebla would betray the army of the radical government of Juarez, that he decided on a frontal attack of the two hills where General Zaragoza had deployed his men, Cerro de Guadalupe and Cerro de Loreto. Also, Lurencez could not know that the general ln his twenties who led the flanking attack for Zaragoza was the military genius who would eventually destroy the armies of Emperor Maximilian. His name was Gen¬ eral Porflrlo Diaz, and this was his first major com¬ mand. Before the battle, General Laurencez wrote bis government: "We have over the Mexicans such a super¬ iority of race, organization, discipline, morality, and high Ideals that even now, at the head of our valiant six thousand soldiers, I am the master of Mexico." Famous "General Laurencez, commanding 6000 well-trained and handsomely uniformed dragoons and foot soldiers, was given orders to occupy Mexico City. On the path of his march to the capital was Puebla, defended by 4000 Mexicans armed with I antiquated guns—many of which had seen service at the battle of Waterloo fifty years before, and had been bought _t a bargain by Mexico's ambassador to London back ln 182S. Commander of Puebla's forces was Ignaclo Zaragoza, an amateur ln tactical warfare, as were most of his officers, but a seasoned warrior in guerrilla fighting. Laurencez, to show his contempt for (hat ragtag army, called for a charge up the middle of the Mexican defenses at Zara¬ goza's most strongly fortified position. The charge carried his cavalry through soggy ditches, over a crumbling adobe ValL..and up the steep slopes ofthe Cerro de Guadalupe. Bui their drive petered out before reaching Its objective, and over one thousand Frenchmen were left sprawled on'.he field, dead or dying. Laurencez paid for his contempt. The Mexican army held, and then Zaragoza led a counter-attack that drove Laurencez back to Orizaba and, after a short reprieve, attacked him again and drove the remnants of his army to the coast. This was the first time French troops had met defeat ln nearly half a century, and lt was handed them not by a major power of Europe but by the pen¬ niless, war-torn republic of Mexico. This battle for Puebla, fought on May 5, is yearly commemorated ln Mexico by a national holiday, and there Is hardly a Mexican village, town, or city that does not call its main street Clnco de Mayo." But the Cinco de Mayo did more than give Mexicans their most glorious national holiday. A Mexican his¬ tory text comments on its significance as follows: •The victory of the Mexican Army ln the Battle of Clnco de Mayo had far-reaching consequences, national as well as International. With regard to the national consequences, the belief that the French were Invincible in war was destroyed, a belief the Conservative traitors themselves had used to demoralize the defenders of the nation. Furthermore the victory made the entire nation thrill with enthusiasm and patriotism, thus encouraging the Mexican people to continue their struggle against tne Invader without nagging..By this victory, the Mexican Army also gained an additional year ln which to reinforce and reorganize Itself, forming new military cadres, in which almost all the political elements of the nation were repre- As regards the International consequences, the defeat of the French had resounding effects ln Europe, tarnishing the brilliance of Napoleon Ill's prestige, enhancing the honorable posture of the Spanish and British envoys, destroying the slander spread there by the Conserva¬ tives that the Juarez government had no bashingl.. furthermore, this Mexican victory admirably prevented an effective alliance between Napoleon and the Confederate States ln the Civil War of the United States, which could possibly have changed the ending of that struggle. A historian says that on the Clnco de Mayo Zaragoza defended at Puebla the Integrity of the Mexican Father¬ land and the North American Federation." (C. Gonzales Blackaller and L. Guevara Ramirez, Slntesls de his- toria de Mexico, p. 366). Mexican Americans, then, have a double Incentive to cry proudly, "Viva el Clnco deMayo!" And other Ameri¬ cans, ragardless of national origins, have reason to Join them. J. C. Canalea |