April 12, 1985 Pg. 2-3 |
Previous | 12 of 78 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
2 The DaU^P«yiciian Editorial College athletics running rampid... There is a growing concern in the NCAA and among college presidents concerning the lack of integrity in college sports — integrity that most college presidents doubt can be guaranteed. It's no wonder. In a world where college coaches get paid more than college presidents; where college sports can become the imaginary fast track to the pros and where booster and alumni groups pour millions into athletic programs, the meaning of integ¬ rity must have been confused with that of entertainment and money. The most recent example is the alleged point-shaving scheme involving members and coaches of the Tulane University basket¬ ball team. Has big time sports become too big for college presidents to handle? Yes, according to an NCAA commission report. The con¬ census was that universities are "seriously dissatisfied" with their lack of control of their sports programs. An alarming 97 percent said violations of NCAA rules was a problem among alumni, booster clubs and coaches. The survey also showed that big-time athletics is supported at the expense of a student's education. Sixty-three percent cited inadequate academic standards and performances for athletes. Of the NCAA recommendations, the most important is the con¬ trol of athletics budgets by the institutions as well as approval by their presidents and annual external audits of all athletics pro¬ grams, with the presidents selecting the auditors. Too many athletic departments have grown into separate entities and operate as corporations outside of the college president's grasp. The boldest move the presidents can make is to approve the NCAA recommendations and attempt to restore the integrity to college athletics. Letters iWriGa ii;.. apple pie... Ceq^ccM pr,w-»t<»i fc-fcun.,^ fib and Hondas. More on Museum Editor: I am writing in reference to th. Collegian article on "Museum Head- Character Disputed." Whatever thc ac curacy of statements about Dr. Varner' role at this and other institutions. I fee compelled to correct the articli of his relationship with the Californi Kstiea is first a if Daily Collegian - Founded in 1922 tal m Clwf Robert Rc-rij.a. N«w* Product™ Ckria Cookry. Wiya. G—bma. C trial.— WUtaov. M Produc ton-DsfcUi Lovra, Stocy SmHk Typeictlers Svlvl. C.i., S.at. Fn—k«bcr*ar. Mam Kallogs Carlar. Bobbie DLM.aio, Cb.rm.iai Gat.. Bob Kirack, Mnj. Kallojj, I—*_j Molrm. Mary iaaaim Mo.l.a, Da. Mooaay, Viae* Rc-b—at, Tim W—la. £W« Zayaa, Aa—a 7a.ariaa.ra, Man tab Tii.iii.' Adwti_igR*prevrntaliv„Ca—aBowfby, story by a Collegian reporter who informed me that she was working with Charmaine Gctz on a story on Dudley Varner. I asked why the Collegian wanted to do a story on Varner, and she replied that she understood he was ambi¬ tious. I replied that Dudley probably was ambitious, that so was I, and that, in all likelihood, so was she! Adding that il was virtually impossible for most people to ever totally know someone else's inner thoughts. 1 suggested that the Collegian run a story on the fight for thc old Administration Building, or the Tight over alternative museum sites, or the possible impact of such a large facility on thc campus. I understood that the focus of the siory had been modified and 1 indicated my willingness to share information in my files on those topics. I was subsequently contacted by Charmaine Getz, There is no question that 1 had not been pleased with the conduct of the current leadership of the California Agricultural Museum. When the State Parks Commis¬ sion voted last August to look at alter¬ native sites, I warned the CAM Board thai if we backed away from the Old Adminis¬ tration Building on the Fresno City College campus, we might lose both the buildingand any ag museum for Fresno. 1 felt strongly that such a step by thc board would be a betrayal of a twelve year effort to save a building which symbolized the beginnings of higher public education in the San Joaquin Valley. At the very least, I wanted that old building reconsidered along with other alternative sites. This was not done. Although I have never said so publicly, I have indicated to a number of people privately that I thought the present CAM Board had been opportun-^ istic in theirapproach to the Old Adminis¬ tration Building, and, more recently, in reversing their position on the Sun Maid ' At the same time, as I told both Collegian reporters, there had always been a split on the CAM Board between those who were more ii terested in the old buildingand those who were more inter¬ ested in an agricultural n useum. For over a decade, many CAM . -rd members conscientiously supported ' oth goals. By last summer, the balance 1 id switched to those more concerned ab> -it an agricul¬ tural museum. Considerinj the long years of delay in securing such ;. facility in the Old Administration Building, it is easy to understand their willingness to accept a new site. The only way to preserve the concept of an agricultural museum for Fresno, they argued, was to cooperate with thc California Department of Parks and Recreation staff. Notwithstanding my bitterness over the CAM role on the Old Administration Building, I can con-" ccive that at some future date it may be said that Dr. Varner and the CAM Board helped save thc agricultural museum for Fresno. Indeed, as I told the reporters, I even admitted this to the CAM Board last year. Not only was this statement omitted in the Collegian article of April 9, but I find that I am quoted to the effect that Varner "has betrayed us. He is a traitor." What¬ ever my personal feelings, I dont believe I would ever have made such a statement to a reporter. I don't know where the loaded, word "traitor" came from, but 1 certainly did not use it in my conversations with the reporters. Not only are my comments Letters Policy The Dally Collegian welcomes expressions olall views from kepi aa brief as possible and are subject to. condensation. Include the wtttaha name, signature, address and telephone initials will not ba used. Send to: They umbe si Letters should be mm be typed and . Paeudonyma and Utter, to the Daly Coamamn eammmm ***** 55555 WW FmncsCA M710 Letters may also be delivered directly to the Daily Collegian office generally garbled up in your article, but the whole tone of my statements have been badly twisted out of context. Perhipi this was the result of two reporlen working on the story with one reporter trying to utilize notes taken by her colleague. Had the reporters been more careful, they would have included in their story my comments that I thought Dudlcj waja very capable, intelligent, personable individual. I distinctly said that up until the Parks Commission decision last sum¬ mer, Varner had done a superb job of fighting for an agricultural museum in th Old Administration Building. I knew thi Varner was ambitious, but, frankly, tluti exactly the kind of person you want fo the job. As far as I was concerned, Dr. Varncr's performance as exei tor of the CAM Board was flawless. Other former Board members would probaWj agree with me that Varner put hours at minimal pay in a dedicated effort to launch an agricultural museum. Tht fact that I am unhappy with Dr. Varna and events since August cannot chaap my .assessment of his earlier role. I mijH add lhat there was one other individu_j present when 1 received one of ibr, reporter's telephone calls about Dr. Varner. This person's recollecti conversation confirms what I have writtetj above. If the Collegian really wanted lobe fair to Varner, why was this inform."*"] excluded? Why didn't the reporters inter-; view Walt Harpain, the curr President, or past CAM board 1 suspect that the Collegian interested in an expose. Why else the*! would the Collegian use "confidcnliifj personnel material? The fact that " Collegian received such informstii raises some interesting questions, originated the concept of a story Varner? Was it one of the reporters? I' more importantly, did these student porters and their editor, in their zeal ft big story, recognize that they were di with a human being instead of an ol How would they, some ten years ft now, like someone to investigate thuT with the urne kind of inquisitorial P Are you confident that all quor' * See Letters, P*l«| Letters tragic. -Opinion Continued from page 2 c\\cti in the article are accurate now that I _ave suggested that my comments were „_cn out of context? I certainly hope that ihe Collegian is not so desperate for readers that they are stooping to the level 0f a supermarket tabloid. From my per¬ fective, it appears that your article -veals as much about the journalists involved as it does about Dr. Varner. What is even more unfortunate is that ihe article might somehow jeopardize thc locaiion of the state agricultural museum on ihis campus. Whatever problems such inagriculturalmusuern would present for campus, and there are some, the prestigious facility would be Ephraim K. Smith April 12,1985 3 Re-entry reply m od el. Many studenu on campus feel that she is directly responsible for ti ' " ' Worte than pigs Editor: As s XlrmirVnt/ftHPLfsso ' ttWNY OTHER rVJNb MBBMf BCTrS, OUR 1WU0HT5 TVrVieP TV, /mRiot'i frVofjjB mme I WAN**' .. -„, „ KABOKOV time KntvrXE vernos II mtXH hulk -mce \\mmr' m maacA- HObm. eKnn.,H".Udent " CSUF' 1 tove *« Editor exposed to m,„y new, exciting and I would Uke to complain ___ a TJT*t l"' ' Mpecl ,0 fmd *E •* manner, of certain .Tudenu in ^ n ' \°„_,1 '■ ""V'- HoWever' ,he £S ■dence Dining Hall. TTiev ,eH me __, ; .« h" mVolv,5« Mn' A*» P°™». the near them. ' ney «<" me not to s.t acting director of the Reentry Program, inatnaS^e^^vSeSS"; .SF""",«*"«*J? «"«" s=Sr= afjfitmmim Bill Graham Alice Powell is.,n outstanding role BWrmcMyoNemi*,. ITU 'WfiM -mm rffBr__r£P_i KnuniVTahle PRESENTS THE CEDAR +DAKOTA 2 2 WEEKEND! $2 Off any Large Pizza $2Pitchers|rftdrinksbyPep5i' TrW.fttlMSWmMPe A SMN6 S&l$0« K WOVLP ,, not'uaa fatter.. "m rvmamon / \ouveK. aire u uuctny rcaponsioie ior their being encouraged to resume their education. Unfortunately, CSUF, specifically Dean Corcoran, does not agree with our asses¬ sment of ber value. WeVe been told that the proper procedures were followed in hiring a permanent, full -time director of the Reentry Program — but we think that the administration on this campus is hiding behind the bureaucratic process of red tape, legislative double talk and ordinary baloney to remove Mrs. Powell from this program. Will the new director have better skills, greater qualities and character? Can CSUF guarantee that? 1 pay tuition for good instruction and quality assistance. 1 dont feel 1 will get this from someone who is not familiar with this campus, or this community. This university has again lost a tremendous asset. Paula Deming <0)lP_i__--i<IDI_Qc_Dtlc_2dl?) Write the Collegian ^ ****** & Do-tt-Yourtelf 4*, or Wo do If for you CUAN • SAFI * CONVENIENT * Carpeted * * Always Attended * * Glant-Lood Washers * * Same Day Fluff-N-fbld * 229-0467 J PUBLIC LECTURE PUBLIC LECTURE J • Budweiser & Coors Been Come visit our new location at 3870 N. Cedar and present your FSU I.D. card when ordering to take advantage of this offer. PHONE: 222-5187 THE LAST HONEST PIZZA! This offer valid Friday, Saturday and Sunday, (Apr 12,13,14) at Cedar & Dakota location only CSUF ARMENIAN STUDIES PROGRAM AND ARMENIAN STUDENTS ORGANIZATION PRESENT DENIAL OF GENOCIDE: THE ARMENIAN CASE DR. RICHARD HOVANNISIAN . j Professor of Armenian and Near Eastern History j University of California, Los Angeles j—Sunday, April 14,1985 ! — 3:00 p.m. j — Satellite College Union - No Admission Charge _=*=_■ ! -_ ___rC_.
Object Description
Title | 1985_04 The Daily Collegian April 1985 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1985 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | April 12, 1985 Pg. 2-3 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1985 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search |
2 The DaU^P«yiciian
Editorial
College athletics
running rampid...
There is a growing concern in the NCAA and among college
presidents concerning the lack of integrity in college sports —
integrity that most college presidents doubt can be guaranteed.
It's no wonder. In a world where college coaches get paid more
than college presidents; where college sports can become the
imaginary fast track to the pros and where booster and alumni
groups pour millions into athletic programs, the meaning of integ¬
rity must have been confused with that of entertainment and
money.
The most recent example is the alleged point-shaving scheme
involving members and coaches of the Tulane University basket¬
ball team.
Has big time sports become too big for college presidents to
handle? Yes, according to an NCAA commission report. The con¬
census was that universities are "seriously dissatisfied" with their
lack of control of their sports programs.
An alarming 97 percent said violations of NCAA rules was a
problem among alumni, booster clubs and coaches. The survey
also showed that big-time athletics is supported at the expense of a
student's education. Sixty-three percent cited inadequate academic
standards and performances for athletes.
Of the NCAA recommendations, the most important is the con¬
trol of athletics budgets by the institutions as well as approval by
their presidents and annual external audits of all athletics pro¬
grams, with the presidents selecting the auditors.
Too many athletic departments have grown into separate entities
and operate as corporations outside of the college president's
grasp. The boldest move the presidents can make is to approve the
NCAA recommendations and attempt to restore the integrity to
college athletics.
Letters
iWriGa ii;..
apple pie...
Ceq^ccM pr,w-»t<»i fc-fcun.,^
fib
and Hondas.
More on Museum
Editor:
I am writing in reference to th.
Collegian article on "Museum Head-
Character Disputed." Whatever thc ac
curacy of statements about Dr. Varner'
role at this and other institutions. I fee
compelled to correct the articli
of his relationship with the Californi
Kstiea
is first
a if
Daily Collegian
- Founded in 1922
tal m Clwf Robert Rc-rij.a.
N«w* Product™ Ckria Cookry. Wiya.
G—bma. C trial.— WUtaov.
M Produc ton-DsfcUi Lovra, Stocy SmHk
Typeictlers Svlvl. C.i., S.at.
Fn—k«bcr*ar. Mam Kallogs
Carlar. Bobbie DLM.aio, Cb.rm.iai
Gat.. Bob Kirack, Mnj. Kallojj,
I—*_j Molrm. Mary iaaaim Mo.l.a, Da.
Mooaay, Viae* Rc-b—at, Tim W—la.
£W« Zayaa, Aa—a 7a.ariaa.ra, Man tab
Tii.iii.'
Adwti_igR*prevrntaliv„Ca—aBowfby,
story by a Collegian reporter
who informed me that she was working
with Charmaine Gctz on a story on
Dudley Varner. I asked why the Collegian
wanted to do a story on Varner, and she
replied that she understood he was ambi¬
tious. I replied that Dudley probably was
ambitious, that so was I, and that, in all
likelihood, so was she! Adding that il was
virtually impossible for most people to
ever totally know someone else's inner
thoughts. 1 suggested that the Collegian
run a story on the fight for thc old
Administration Building, or the Tight over
alternative museum sites, or the possible
impact of such a large facility on thc
campus. I understood that the focus of the
siory had been modified and 1 indicated
my willingness to share information in my
files on those topics. I was subsequently
contacted by Charmaine Getz,
There is no question that 1 had not been
pleased with the conduct of the current
leadership of the California Agricultural
Museum. When the State Parks Commis¬
sion voted last August to look at alter¬
native sites, I warned the CAM Board thai
if we backed away from the Old Adminis¬
tration Building on the Fresno City
College campus, we might lose both the
buildingand any ag museum for Fresno. 1
felt strongly that such a step by thc board
would be a betrayal of a twelve year effort
to save a building which symbolized the
beginnings of higher public education in
the San Joaquin Valley. At the very least,
I wanted that old building reconsidered
along with other alternative sites. This
was not done. Although I have never said
so publicly, I have indicated to a number
of people privately that I thought the
present CAM Board had been opportun-^
istic in theirapproach to the Old Adminis¬
tration Building, and, more recently, in
reversing their position on the Sun Maid
' At the same time, as I told both
Collegian reporters, there had always
been a split on the CAM Board between
those who were more ii terested in the old
buildingand those who were more inter¬
ested in an agricultural n useum. For over
a decade, many CAM . -rd members
conscientiously supported ' oth goals. By
last summer, the balance 1 id switched to
those more concerned ab> -it an agricul¬
tural museum. Considerinj the long years
of delay in securing such ;. facility in the
Old Administration Building, it is easy to
understand their willingness to accept a
new site. The only way to preserve the
concept of an agricultural museum for
Fresno, they argued, was to cooperate
with thc California Department of Parks
and Recreation staff. Notwithstanding
my bitterness over the CAM role on the
Old Administration Building, I can con-"
ccive that at some future date it may be
said that Dr. Varner and the CAM Board
helped save thc agricultural museum for
Fresno. Indeed, as I told the reporters, I
even admitted this to the CAM Board last
year.
Not only was this statement omitted in
the Collegian article of April 9, but I find
that I am quoted to the effect that Varner
"has betrayed us. He is a traitor." What¬
ever my personal feelings, I dont believe I
would ever have made such a statement to
a reporter. I don't know where the loaded,
word "traitor" came from, but 1 certainly
did not use it in my conversations with the
reporters. Not only are my comments
Letters Policy
The Dally Collegian welcomes expressions olall views from
kepi aa brief as possible and are subject to. condensation.
Include the wtttaha name, signature, address and telephone
initials will not ba used. Send to:
They
umbe
si Letters should be
mm be typed and
. Paeudonyma and
Utter, to the Daly Coamamn
eammmm ***** 55555 WW
FmncsCA M710
Letters may also be delivered directly to the Daily Collegian office
generally garbled up in your article, but
the whole tone of my statements have
been badly twisted out of context. Perhipi
this was the result of two reporlen
working on the story with one reporter
trying to utilize notes taken by her
colleague. Had the reporters been more
careful, they would have included in their
story my comments that I thought Dudlcj
waja very capable, intelligent, personable
individual. I distinctly said that up until
the Parks Commission decision last sum¬
mer, Varner had done a superb job of
fighting for an agricultural museum in th
Old Administration Building. I knew thi
Varner was ambitious, but, frankly, tluti
exactly the kind of person you want fo
the job. As far as I was concerned, Dr.
Varncr's performance as exei
tor of the CAM Board was flawless. Other
former Board members would probaWj
agree with me that Varner put
hours at minimal pay in a dedicated effort
to launch an agricultural museum. Tht
fact that I am unhappy with Dr. Varna
and events since August cannot chaap
my .assessment of his earlier role. I mijH
add lhat there was one other individu_j
present when 1 received one of ibr,
reporter's telephone calls about Dr.
Varner. This person's recollecti
conversation confirms what I have writtetj
above. If the Collegian really wanted lobe
fair to Varner, why was this inform."*"]
excluded? Why didn't the reporters inter-;
view Walt Harpain, the curr
President, or past CAM board
1 suspect that the Collegian
interested in an expose. Why else the*!
would the Collegian use "confidcnliifj
personnel material? The fact that "
Collegian received such informstii
raises some interesting questions,
originated the concept of a story
Varner? Was it one of the reporters? I'
more importantly, did these student
porters and their editor, in their zeal ft
big story, recognize that they were di
with a human being instead of an ol
How would they, some ten years ft
now, like someone to investigate thuT
with the urne kind of inquisitorial P
Are you confident that all quor'
* See Letters, P*l«|
Letters
tragic.
-Opinion
Continued from page 2
c\\cti in the article are accurate now that I
_ave suggested that my comments were
„_cn out of context? I certainly hope that
ihe Collegian is not so desperate for
readers that they are stooping to the level
0f a supermarket tabloid. From my per¬
fective, it appears that your article
-veals as much about the journalists
involved as it does about Dr. Varner.
What is even more unfortunate is that
ihe article might somehow jeopardize thc
locaiion of the state agricultural museum
on ihis campus. Whatever problems such
inagriculturalmusuern would present for
campus, and there are some, the
prestigious facility would be
Ephraim K. Smith
April 12,1985 3
Re-entry reply
m od el. Many studenu on campus feel that
she is directly responsible for ti ' " '
Worte than pigs
Editor:
As s
XlrmirVnt/ftHPLfsso
' ttWNY OTHER rVJNb MBBMf
BCTrS, OUR 1WU0HT5 TVrVieP TV,
/mRiot'i frVofjjB mme
I
WAN**'
.. -„, „ KABOKOV
time KntvrXE vernos
II mtXH hulk -mce
\\mmr' m maacA-
HObm.
eKnn.,H".Udent " CSUF' 1 tove *«
Editor exposed to m,„y new, exciting and
I would Uke to complain ___ a TJT*t l"' ' Mpecl ,0 fmd *E •*
manner, of certain .Tudenu in ^ n ' \°„_,1 '■ ""V'- HoWever' ,he £S
■dence Dining Hall. TTiev ,eH me __, ; .« h" mVolv,5« Mn' A*» P°™». the
near them. ' ney «<" me not to s.t acting director of the Reentry Program,
inatnaS^e^^vSeSS"; .SF""",«*"«*J? «"«"
s=Sr= afjfitmmim
Bill Graham Alice Powell is.,n outstanding role
BWrmcMyoNemi*,.
ITU 'WfiM
-mm
rffBr__r£P_i
KnuniVTahle
PRESENTS THE
CEDAR +DAKOTA
2 2 WEEKEND!
$2 Off any Large Pizza
$2Pitchers|rftdrinksbyPep5i'
TrW.fttlMSWmMPe
A SMN6 S&l$0« K WOVLP
,, not'uaa fatter..
"m
rvmamon
/
\ouveK.
aire u uuctny rcaponsioie ior their being
encouraged to resume their education.
Unfortunately, CSUF, specifically Dean
Corcoran, does not agree with our asses¬
sment of ber value. WeVe been told that
the proper procedures were followed in
hiring a permanent, full -time director of
the Reentry Program — but we think that
the administration on this campus is
hiding behind the bureaucratic process of
red tape, legislative double talk and
ordinary baloney to remove Mrs. Powell
from this program.
Will the new director have better skills,
greater qualities and character? Can
CSUF guarantee that? 1 pay tuition for
good instruction and quality assistance. 1
dont feel 1 will get this from someone who
is not familiar with this campus, or this
community. This university has again lost
a tremendous asset.
Paula Deming
<0)lP_i__--i |