November 5, 1986, Page 2 |
Previous | 18 of 155 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
■ Wednesday, Nov. S, 1986 . Reader Response to Daily Collegian articles and opinion are welcome. Send letters no longer than 250 words in length to Daily Collegian. Keats Campus Bldg.. CSUF. Fresno. CA 93^40 Letters must be signed and include the writers name, address and telephone number Take a tour of Hell Dear Editor, Joe Ruelas, in his Oct. 20 letter to The Daily Collegian defending one of the most murderous regimes in this hemisphere, is not a person who has bothered to aquaint himself with the facts of life in El Salva'dor, even though he claims to have lived there for four years. Ruelas sounds more like an employee of the U.S. Embassy in that country (which has woven such an incredible web of sclf-servi ng lies about the situation that their credibility is next to zero) than someone who cares about how U.S. aid goes to directly repress the Salvadoran people. Every bit of the annual $500 million in U.S. aid money to El Salvador is spent in conjunction with one of the most sophisticated and devious counter- insurgency wars this country has ever fought, and as ex-CIA officer John Stockwell points out, we are on the wrong side in El Salavador. Ruelas even goes as far as to defend the aerial bombing of civilians, mostly women and children, because he sees these people as the "enemy." They may be Ruelas* enemy, but not mine. The Salvadoran people have been repressed for decades by a ruthless military/ oligarchy alliance which runs the country for its own economic bene¬ fit. While thc U.S.-backed wealthy Salva- dorans export coffee and cotton and pocket the bucks (as long as they share enough with Corporate America), the Salvadoran population has become one of the world's worst-fed. If the people, led by the FMLN/ FDR in the country¬ side and the mass organizations in the cities, are willing to take up arms against such an unjust system after all peaceful means of change have been met by government violence and U.S.- supplied weapons, more power to them. Not only does Ruelas place himself squarely on the wrong side in the struggle in El Salvador, he doesn 't even do a very good job of it. Nothing in his letter indicated that he has read very much about.the country if anything, and the sourceJpr his shallow argu¬ ments has clearly been the garbage that is put out by the State Department. Ruelas points toward the elections, which were heJd both in 1982 and <n 1984. With/the help of $2.2 million from the CIA (according to Sen. Jesse Helms, who was pissed because he wanted the CIA to back a candidate with closer ties to the death squads), Duarte was elected in 1984. According to a U.S. Senate briefing on the elec¬ tions, it was revealed that the CIA did "everything but stuff the ballot boxes." Anyone who has done any serious reading'about El Salvador (Ruelas clearly has not) knows how meaningless the elections are in a country where government' troops drag opposition leaders away" from press conferences I like they did in 1982 and mutilate thc bodies. Ballots are also numbered in El Salvador, and people who don't have a stamp indicating that they voted are assumed to be "subversives." A "subversive" is any Salvadoran who wants a more just and democratic society and is willing to work for it, anus putting the "subversive" at odds with the oligarchy and the U.S. Embassy. Ruelas' profound ignorance of the situation is demonstrated when he , argues that the country is a "democracy" because people were crowding to vote, when it was well known (except in the U.S.) that people were really crowding to get the election stamp because they feared for their lives. The elections were an important part of the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy designed to make El Salvador appear to be a democracy to make it easier to get aid from Congress while the oligarchy/- military alliance and the U.S. Embassy went on rulinglhe country w'tp an iron fist. Another trubute to Ruelas'ignorance is that he finds it "hard to believe" that a Christian activist could be taken away and killed by the current govern¬ ment. Oh really? Just where was Ruelas in the last four years? Hiding out in the U:S. Embassy? Literally thousands of occurrences, like the ones Ruelas finds hard to believe have occurred since the THIS BUD'S FOR you: Donaghy Sales i ajifr aggressive counterinsurgency plan of the Reagan administration has gone into effect. In one case four U.S. nuns . were raped and murdered by death squads in 1982, and according to an ex-officer of the Salvadoran govern¬ ment, those responsible are still holding high posts in the Duarte administration. One of the officers explained the reason they were murdered by saying, "they were subversives." The attrocities committed by Salva¬ doran security forces in order to disrupt a legitimate and courageous mass oppo¬ sition to the status quo are well docu¬ mented, leading to over 50,000 deaths. Ruelas dismisses this fact by claiming that the opposition groups are also guilty, and he believes that tbe FM LN/ - FDR commits some of these actions to give the army a bad reputation. It doesn't even make sense. Are we sup¬ posed to believe that rebels kill their potential supporters to get the rest of the people on their side? Wake up, Ruelas, Reagan's Nicaraguan Contras are an example of how this simply doesn't work, and there is absolutely no evidence that thc FMLN/FDR is doing it anyway (unless you believe the State Department's professional liars bureau). Perhaps if Ruelas wants to go on another four-year fantasy vacation, he should give Hell a try. 1 am sure his report wpuld be most favorable. Steve Bruhn MEETING Continued from page 1 how the adviser spends time with the committees is not subject to A.S. approval. It's not possible for anyone from the student program office to do what you want me to do." In other business, Senator-at-Large Scott Vick opened discussion with a resolution to dorm students' problem with tree sap dripping on their cars. He said spraying the trees for aphids should solve the problem for this season. Vick also read a formal apology to the other senators for authorizing the A.S. promotion poster that depicts pictures of all the A.S. officers and senators. The oversized poster violated size requirements which must be met before any announcement is placed on College Union and Satellite College Union display a boards and the campus kiosks which the CU owns. Vick said he did it in protest because the CU is violating its own rules with posters depicting upcoming CU events. He held up several movie posters arid a Starship concert poster as examples. College Union Program Committee Presents: soia : Nov. 5, 3:00 pm, SCU : • Admission $1.50 j • Preview to Alice Walker Debate •
Object Description
Title | 1986_11 The Daily Collegian November 1986 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1986 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | November 5, 1986, Page 2 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1986 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search |
■ Wednesday, Nov. S, 1986 .
Reader
Response
to Daily Collegian articles and opinion are
welcome. Send letters no longer than 250
words in length to Daily Collegian. Keats
Campus Bldg.. CSUF. Fresno. CA 93^40
Letters must be signed and include the
writers name, address and telephone
number
Take a tour of Hell
Dear Editor,
Joe Ruelas, in his Oct. 20 letter to
The Daily Collegian defending one of
the most murderous regimes in this
hemisphere, is not a person who has
bothered to aquaint himself with the
facts of life in El Salva'dor, even though
he claims to have lived there for four
years. Ruelas sounds more like an
employee of the U.S. Embassy in that
country (which has woven such an
incredible web of sclf-servi ng lies about
the situation that their credibility is
next to zero) than someone who cares
about how U.S. aid goes to directly
repress the Salvadoran people.
Every bit of the annual $500 million
in U.S. aid money to El Salvador is
spent in conjunction with one of the
most sophisticated and devious counter-
insurgency wars this country has ever
fought, and as ex-CIA officer John
Stockwell points out, we are on the
wrong side in El Salavador.
Ruelas even goes as far as to defend
the aerial bombing of civilians, mostly
women and children, because he sees
these people as the "enemy." They may
be Ruelas* enemy, but not mine.
The Salvadoran people have been
repressed for decades by a ruthless
military/ oligarchy alliance which runs
the country for its own economic bene¬
fit. While thc U.S.-backed wealthy Salva-
dorans export coffee and cotton and
pocket the bucks (as long as they share
enough with Corporate America), the
Salvadoran population has become one
of the world's worst-fed. If the people,
led by the FMLN/ FDR in the country¬
side and the mass organizations in the
cities, are willing to take up arms
against such an unjust system after all
peaceful means of change have been
met by government violence and U.S.-
supplied weapons, more power to them.
Not only does Ruelas place himself
squarely on the wrong side in the
struggle in El Salvador, he doesn 't even
do a very good job of it. Nothing in his
letter indicated that he has read very
much about.the country if anything,
and the sourceJpr his shallow argu¬
ments has clearly been the garbage that
is put out by the State Department.
Ruelas points toward the elections,
which were heJd both in 1982 and |