April 1, 1997, Page 2 |
Previous | 2 of 132 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
s THE DAILY COLLEGIAN Tuesday, April 1,1997 Opinion Telephone: (209) 278-5732 Supreme Court ruling adds double edge to EPA sword By Paul Jackson The Daily Collegian The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that private individuals may sue the government for prop¬ erty loss resulting from enforce¬ ment of the Endangered Species Act. The decision overturns a ruling by an Oregon appellate court, which refused to recognize property owners' standing to sue the Envi¬ ronmental Protection Agency after that agency interfered with their water rights in order to protect a rare species of salmon. The recent decision comes as a major victory for property rights advocates. It also comes as wonder- ful news to Fresnans. whose economy depends heavily on access to water. Now the EPA wields a double- edged sword. The Endangered Spe¬ cies Act is no longer one-sided, but can be used to protect property rights against actions taken by the EPA to protect endangered species. Abuse of governmental power has occ.urred. not just in the EPA. but in all governmental agencies at one time or another. But the EPA has received par¬ ticular attention because it is only a few decades old and has garnered considerable power in that time. The EPA also draws unfavorable attention because of its unique pro¬ tocol — to protect the environment against the effects of what is often l simply considered to be "efficient" \ business practices. Since such "efficiency" doesn't take the earth's well-being into con¬ sideration, a parent-like EPA inter¬ venes in the private sector. Conservatives, even though they favor reducing government over¬ sight of business, have made excep¬ tions when it comes to protecting the environment. Theodore Roosevelt, a Repub¬ lican, was the first U.S. president to introduce conservation measures. Conservatism and conservation measures go hand in hand. Charles Murray, a social scien¬ tist with the conservative American Enterprise Institute, last month pub¬ lished a book in which he envisions the federal government at a small fraction of its current size, yet with a strong EPA.- While boycotting and other con¬ sumer activism would, in a laissez- faire economy, be the means of pro¬ moting a healthier environment, public concern regarding environ¬ mental issues, though continuous ever since the 1960s, is too weak to exert enough pressure to control businesses that are not environmen¬ tally responsible. If public awareness of environ¬ mental issues was adequate, why are people more aware of the water needs of salmon in the Sacramento Valley or Oregon, than they are of their own water needs? In California, the public water supply is being polluted — not in violation, but in fulfillment, of a law. Fluoridation of the public water supply in most California cities, including Fresno and Clovis. was mandated beginning Jan. 1 of this year. The assumption behind this law, as well as the "safety" of the state Health and Safety Department's maximum permissible level of con¬ centration (about 1 part fluoride per one million parts water), is in seri¬ ous controversy. Chemistry students know that fluorine, the main ingredient in fluoride, is a very poisonous sub¬ stance. Fluoride itself is more poi¬ sonous than lead and just slightly more poisonous than arsenic, ac¬ cording to a 1984 study. In a public statement that same Please see FLOURIDE page 5. Trickle down economics, Reagan era revisited By Joel Eanes The Daily Collegian Everyone knows the basic eco¬ nomic history of the 1980s. Presi¬ dent Ronald Reagan greedily slashed taxes while wasting billions on military defense projects, thus creating a huge budget deficit. This continued until Bill "have the cour¬ age to change" Clinton caine to save the country. This story has been repeated again and again. The trouble is this account is wrong. President Reagan came to power in 1981, in the face of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and an aggressive So¬ viet Empire that was winning the Cold War. He believed that expansionist government had removed so much wealth from the economy that it could no longer function. He re¬ solved to put this wealth — this "stimulus," in Clinton's terms — back in the economy, not by more spending, but by cutting taxes. To avoid deficits, spending would have to be reduced. Because of the Soviet threat, national de¬ fense would have to be exempt, at least for the first few years. Why then, did themassive defi¬ cits of the 1980s follow? The better question is why were ihe deficits of the 1970s were rela¬ tively small? The reason is infla¬ tion. Usually, the government has two ways to raise money: taxing and borrowing. But there is a third way, which is simply to print it. The problem here is that, as with every¬ thing else, there is no such thing as a free lunch. It's the economic extension of the Newtonian principal — for ev¬ ery action, there's an equal and op¬ posite reaction. The reaction to the printing press is inflation. So what is inflation? The dollar is a way of quantifying value, the way that, say, the foot quantifies length. A ruler can be said to be a length of one foot, or of 12 inches. One number is larger than the other, but the amount of length is the same. The principle of inflation works the same way. If the governmeni prints more money, but the amouni of wealth in the economy is the same, then the same-sized economy is represented by a larger number of dollars. Each dollar is worth less. and a larger number of dollars is needed to buy the same thing. This is inflation. So what happened in the 1970s? The government spent more than it took in, and covered most of the difference by printing. Inflation followed. In fiscal year 1981. the last fis¬ cal year before Reagan took office, annual inflation was at 10.4 percent. But then the Federal Reserve, which prints the money, began cracking down on inflation. It plunged during the coming years, declining to only 1.9 percent Please see REAGAN page 5. Daily Collegian California State University, Fresno Business Manager Kari L. Swanson Copy Editors Elaina Conroy Jevon. C. Swanson Production Manager ■ Monica Stanford Editor in Chief James M. Ward News Editor Matthew Hart Features Editor David Childers Ad Manager Jevon C. Swanson Sports Editor Luis Hernandez Photographers Paul Martinez ' Ryan Weber Web Production Jason Maggini Staff Writers: Abid Yahya, Jennifer Brodie, Cheryl Ensom, Theresa Alvarado, Rosanna Tolosa, Hakim Allen, Ruthie Longley Alekseyev, Derek Walter Sports Writers: Erik Pfeifle. Gary Chapla, Kael Moffat, Jennifer Starks, Ranjeet Randhawa, Tom Sepulveda, Erika Garza Columnists: Bridget Johnson, Paul McCauley, Manuel Annear, Joel Eanes, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Alice Egoian. Mats Helgren Bethany Thompson Ad Reps: Judy Yhnell. Dan Glenn Circulation: Sam Roblcs Graphics: Robert Bilvado The Daily Collegian is published five nines a week for and by ihe students of California Stale University, Fresno Opinions expressed in (he Collegian arc not necessarily those of (he entire Daily Collegian staff. The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length and clanty To be considered for publication. letters must be typed and should not exceed 250 words. Telephone Directory: Editor: (209)278-5732 News (209)278-2486 Sports: (209)278-5733 Advertising: (209)278-5731 FAX: (209)278-2679
Object Description
Title | 1997_04 The Daily Collegian April 1997 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1997 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | April 1, 1997, Page 2 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1997 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | s THE DAILY COLLEGIAN Tuesday, April 1,1997 Opinion Telephone: (209) 278-5732 Supreme Court ruling adds double edge to EPA sword By Paul Jackson The Daily Collegian The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that private individuals may sue the government for prop¬ erty loss resulting from enforce¬ ment of the Endangered Species Act. The decision overturns a ruling by an Oregon appellate court, which refused to recognize property owners' standing to sue the Envi¬ ronmental Protection Agency after that agency interfered with their water rights in order to protect a rare species of salmon. The recent decision comes as a major victory for property rights advocates. It also comes as wonder- ful news to Fresnans. whose economy depends heavily on access to water. Now the EPA wields a double- edged sword. The Endangered Spe¬ cies Act is no longer one-sided, but can be used to protect property rights against actions taken by the EPA to protect endangered species. Abuse of governmental power has occ.urred. not just in the EPA. but in all governmental agencies at one time or another. But the EPA has received par¬ ticular attention because it is only a few decades old and has garnered considerable power in that time. The EPA also draws unfavorable attention because of its unique pro¬ tocol — to protect the environment against the effects of what is often l simply considered to be "efficient" \ business practices. Since such "efficiency" doesn't take the earth's well-being into con¬ sideration, a parent-like EPA inter¬ venes in the private sector. Conservatives, even though they favor reducing government over¬ sight of business, have made excep¬ tions when it comes to protecting the environment. Theodore Roosevelt, a Repub¬ lican, was the first U.S. president to introduce conservation measures. Conservatism and conservation measures go hand in hand. Charles Murray, a social scien¬ tist with the conservative American Enterprise Institute, last month pub¬ lished a book in which he envisions the federal government at a small fraction of its current size, yet with a strong EPA.- While boycotting and other con¬ sumer activism would, in a laissez- faire economy, be the means of pro¬ moting a healthier environment, public concern regarding environ¬ mental issues, though continuous ever since the 1960s, is too weak to exert enough pressure to control businesses that are not environmen¬ tally responsible. If public awareness of environ¬ mental issues was adequate, why are people more aware of the water needs of salmon in the Sacramento Valley or Oregon, than they are of their own water needs? In California, the public water supply is being polluted — not in violation, but in fulfillment, of a law. Fluoridation of the public water supply in most California cities, including Fresno and Clovis. was mandated beginning Jan. 1 of this year. The assumption behind this law, as well as the "safety" of the state Health and Safety Department's maximum permissible level of con¬ centration (about 1 part fluoride per one million parts water), is in seri¬ ous controversy. Chemistry students know that fluorine, the main ingredient in fluoride, is a very poisonous sub¬ stance. Fluoride itself is more poi¬ sonous than lead and just slightly more poisonous than arsenic, ac¬ cording to a 1984 study. In a public statement that same Please see FLOURIDE page 5. Trickle down economics, Reagan era revisited By Joel Eanes The Daily Collegian Everyone knows the basic eco¬ nomic history of the 1980s. Presi¬ dent Ronald Reagan greedily slashed taxes while wasting billions on military defense projects, thus creating a huge budget deficit. This continued until Bill "have the cour¬ age to change" Clinton caine to save the country. This story has been repeated again and again. The trouble is this account is wrong. President Reagan came to power in 1981, in the face of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and an aggressive So¬ viet Empire that was winning the Cold War. He believed that expansionist government had removed so much wealth from the economy that it could no longer function. He re¬ solved to put this wealth — this "stimulus," in Clinton's terms — back in the economy, not by more spending, but by cutting taxes. To avoid deficits, spending would have to be reduced. Because of the Soviet threat, national de¬ fense would have to be exempt, at least for the first few years. Why then, did themassive defi¬ cits of the 1980s follow? The better question is why were ihe deficits of the 1970s were rela¬ tively small? The reason is infla¬ tion. Usually, the government has two ways to raise money: taxing and borrowing. But there is a third way, which is simply to print it. The problem here is that, as with every¬ thing else, there is no such thing as a free lunch. It's the economic extension of the Newtonian principal — for ev¬ ery action, there's an equal and op¬ posite reaction. The reaction to the printing press is inflation. So what is inflation? The dollar is a way of quantifying value, the way that, say, the foot quantifies length. A ruler can be said to be a length of one foot, or of 12 inches. One number is larger than the other, but the amount of length is the same. The principle of inflation works the same way. If the governmeni prints more money, but the amouni of wealth in the economy is the same, then the same-sized economy is represented by a larger number of dollars. Each dollar is worth less. and a larger number of dollars is needed to buy the same thing. This is inflation. So what happened in the 1970s? The government spent more than it took in, and covered most of the difference by printing. Inflation followed. In fiscal year 1981. the last fis¬ cal year before Reagan took office, annual inflation was at 10.4 percent. But then the Federal Reserve, which prints the money, began cracking down on inflation. It plunged during the coming years, declining to only 1.9 percent Please see REAGAN page 5. Daily Collegian California State University, Fresno Business Manager Kari L. Swanson Copy Editors Elaina Conroy Jevon. C. Swanson Production Manager ■ Monica Stanford Editor in Chief James M. Ward News Editor Matthew Hart Features Editor David Childers Ad Manager Jevon C. Swanson Sports Editor Luis Hernandez Photographers Paul Martinez ' Ryan Weber Web Production Jason Maggini Staff Writers: Abid Yahya, Jennifer Brodie, Cheryl Ensom, Theresa Alvarado, Rosanna Tolosa, Hakim Allen, Ruthie Longley Alekseyev, Derek Walter Sports Writers: Erik Pfeifle. Gary Chapla, Kael Moffat, Jennifer Starks, Ranjeet Randhawa, Tom Sepulveda, Erika Garza Columnists: Bridget Johnson, Paul McCauley, Manuel Annear, Joel Eanes, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Alice Egoian. Mats Helgren Bethany Thompson Ad Reps: Judy Yhnell. Dan Glenn Circulation: Sam Roblcs Graphics: Robert Bilvado The Daily Collegian is published five nines a week for and by ihe students of California Stale University, Fresno Opinions expressed in (he Collegian arc not necessarily those of (he entire Daily Collegian staff. The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length and clanty To be considered for publication. letters must be typed and should not exceed 250 words. Telephone Directory: Editor: (209)278-5732 News (209)278-2486 Sports: (209)278-5733 Advertising: (209)278-5731 FAX: (209)278-2679 |