September 16, 1996, Page 2 |
Previous | 70 of 140 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
THE DAILY COLLEGIAN Monday, September 16,1996 Opinion Telephone: (209) 278-5732 Weddings are as important as the marriage itself By Ingemar Dahlberg Special to The Daily Collegian This weekend I attended my friend's wedding. I was given the distinction of being one of his groomsmen, the first in line after the best man (his brother). I hadn't been to a wedding in quite a while, and I'd forgotten much of what a wedding actually is, and more im¬ portantly, what it stands for. A wedding is not two people coming together to share the rest of their lives with one another. No — a wedding is a large number of people, a great diversity of people, who come together to celebrate the unity of the two that are being mar¬ ried. The wedding ceremony is a for¬ mality. It is a public notification of sorts. It serves to let everyone know, in no uncertain terms, just how deeply these two people feel about one another. It squashes rumors, begins new ones, and puts the rest of the world on notice that there is another family being added and in¬ tegrated into the superstructure of our society. The reception is where the wed¬ ding is truly held. The reception brings together members and friends of two different families; people so wildly divergent that in any other setting you might expect any number of conflicts to occur. But a reception fosters a solidar¬ ity amongst these strangers, it sus¬ pends all other rules and imposes a number of its own. Rules like, feel¬ ing free to hug the bridesmaid's grandmother, even if you are a friend of the once-removed cousin of the groom, or introduce yourself to that pretty young girl from an¬ other state that you'll never see again, and have a drink or two. Rules that reinforce the notion that it's all right to meet others, no mat¬ ter how different or distant — in fact, it is encouraged. The reception is the celebration of the announcement made at the wedding ceremony. It is where all members concerned come to show their support for the newly married couple. It is where mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, friends, and just about anyone else, welcome one another into each of the respective families, and toast the creation of a new one. It is also where loss is forced into submission by revelry, and newness and change are embraced rather than feared. It is where two fami¬ lies lose sons and daughters, and gain new ones (even if they must be labeled "in-law"). Mothers cry. fathers cry, fraternity brothers cry (well, maybe after the bar shuts down), and emotion seems to carry the day, night, and early morning. For me, it involved watching one of my best friends and his wife for¬ malize the love that's existed be¬ tween them since the day their eyes met. It meant meeting two large families, and many new friends. It meant knowing that although he'll always be my friend, it'll somehow be different. Not bad... just differ¬ ent. I'm 28 years old. You couldn't tell by my articles, I'm sure, but you could by the number of friends I have, both new and old who I have that have tied thejtnot, broken the glass, and lit the candle. Twenty- eight and single, and all the time wondering at life. The bachelor par¬ ties are few and far between now. Instead, birth announcements arrive every" few months. Ydung children struggle to say "Uncle Ingemar." I write this article looking out a window. I wonder whose wedding I will attend next and when. I won¬ der which families I will meet, which nationalities will come to¬ gether to celebrate, and to who I will lose this friend. Perhaps I'm running out of single friends. Per¬ haps I'm next. Maybe tomorrow I will meet the woman of my dreams and we'll run out and get married to. Then people can come together, if only for one night, and enjoy one another's company, perhaps she'd a tear or two for our loss, and go Please see WEDDING page 4. WHAT'S THE DXFFBRENCa B£Tv/E&rt/VBlSNDE WOMAN & QJ-? -THE BLCWf^ CWN't WV£ AHVHORE. ■k Crimes need reclassification to keep 'Three-Strikes' viable By Joel Eanes Special to The Daily Collegian We've all heard the horror sto¬ ries about the three strikes law for criminal sentencing. Even since the legislature enacted it in March, 1994, convicts have been sentenced to twenty-five years to life, some¬ times for a minor offense. While these stories ignore the fact that such people would also have to have been convicted of at least two felonies, they still expose a basic problem in California criminal law: the flawed classification of offenses into felonies and misdemeanors. The three strikes law works as follows. To state the idea very gen¬ erally, a first strike penalty is pre¬ served from pre-1994 law. The pen¬ alty for a second strike is twice the penalty for the first. The penalty for a third strike' is twenty-five years to life, provided that at least two of the three strikes are felonies. Each of those provisions has limited ex¬ ceptions, but this is the general rule. The root of the controversy is the possibility that the third strike can be a misdemeanor, and sometimes a very minor one. What are felonies and misde¬ meanors? Generally, a felony is an offense punishable by a year or more of imprisonment or probation; a misdemeanor is an offense pun¬ ishable by less that a year of im¬ prisonment or probation, or onlj\ by a fine or community service. Any violent crime is by definition a felony, as are serious but non-vio¬ lent crimes. The rest are misde¬ meanors. V The problem, as far as three strikes is concerned, is that California's list of misdemeanors includes many offenses that are as serious as felonies, and also many ' minor offenses that could theoreti¬ cally, but not realistically, result in prison sentences (this is the state prison, not the county jail, which is run under a separate law). A per¬ son who is convicted of such an offense has no realistic possibility of prison time, unless that person has two felony strikes, in which case a misdemeanor suddenly leads to a lengthy prison sentence. This can include people whose felonies were committed decades ago. In addition, when the legislature first laid out the classification of felo¬ nies and misd^racajuus, tjaj&c, strikesdidn'fexTst;soTRTelas^Tr" ' cation was simply not made with three strikes considerations in mind No one looked at how including minor misdemeanors with serious ones would affect sentencing or re¬ peat offenders. California could classify as a felony any offense that carries a realistic probability (not a theoreti¬ cal possibility) of state prison time as a sentence. This would npt in¬ clude county jail sentences or jail¬ ing pending arraignment or trial (three strikes already allows first strike sentences of probation). The new list would include the current roster of felonies, as well as seri¬ ous misdemeanors. It would not include in the new felony list mis¬ demeanors that require restitution but not separation from society - i.e.. non-paid parking tickets. The three strikes law could then be amended to require that all three be of the reclassified felonies. This is Please see EANES page 4. Daily Collegian California State University, Fresno — Sports Editor Tom Sepulveda Web Production Jason Maggini Production Manager Monica Stanford Editor in Chief Jevon C. Swanson Managing Editor Robert Bilvado News Editor Jim Ward Ad Manager Paul McCauley Business Manager Kari L. Scott Photo Editor Paul Martinez Copy Editor Elena Langdon Staff Writers: Man Kreamer, Ruthie Longley, Man Hart, Heather Hartman, Rosanne Tolosa, Hadi Yazdanpanah Sports Writers: Brooke Holve, Luis Hernandez, Erik Pfeifle, Casey Angle, Matt Lievre, Woody Miner, Matt Croce Circulation: Elena Langdon The Daily Collegian is published five times a week for and by the students of California State University. Fresno. Opinions expressed in the Collegian are not necessarily those of the entire Daily Collegian staff The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length and clarity. To be considered for publication. letters must be typed and should not exceed 250 words News: Sports: Advertising: FAX: TrVpbooe Directory: (209)278-5732 (209)278-2486 (209)278-5733 (209)278-5731 (209)278-2679 WWW: http-7/www.csufresno.edu/Collegian
Object Description
Title | 1996_09 The Daily Collegian September 1996 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1996 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | September 16, 1996, Page 2 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1996 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | THE DAILY COLLEGIAN Monday, September 16,1996 Opinion Telephone: (209) 278-5732 Weddings are as important as the marriage itself By Ingemar Dahlberg Special to The Daily Collegian This weekend I attended my friend's wedding. I was given the distinction of being one of his groomsmen, the first in line after the best man (his brother). I hadn't been to a wedding in quite a while, and I'd forgotten much of what a wedding actually is, and more im¬ portantly, what it stands for. A wedding is not two people coming together to share the rest of their lives with one another. No — a wedding is a large number of people, a great diversity of people, who come together to celebrate the unity of the two that are being mar¬ ried. The wedding ceremony is a for¬ mality. It is a public notification of sorts. It serves to let everyone know, in no uncertain terms, just how deeply these two people feel about one another. It squashes rumors, begins new ones, and puts the rest of the world on notice that there is another family being added and in¬ tegrated into the superstructure of our society. The reception is where the wed¬ ding is truly held. The reception brings together members and friends of two different families; people so wildly divergent that in any other setting you might expect any number of conflicts to occur. But a reception fosters a solidar¬ ity amongst these strangers, it sus¬ pends all other rules and imposes a number of its own. Rules like, feel¬ ing free to hug the bridesmaid's grandmother, even if you are a friend of the once-removed cousin of the groom, or introduce yourself to that pretty young girl from an¬ other state that you'll never see again, and have a drink or two. Rules that reinforce the notion that it's all right to meet others, no mat¬ ter how different or distant — in fact, it is encouraged. The reception is the celebration of the announcement made at the wedding ceremony. It is where all members concerned come to show their support for the newly married couple. It is where mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, friends, and just about anyone else, welcome one another into each of the respective families, and toast the creation of a new one. It is also where loss is forced into submission by revelry, and newness and change are embraced rather than feared. It is where two fami¬ lies lose sons and daughters, and gain new ones (even if they must be labeled "in-law"). Mothers cry. fathers cry, fraternity brothers cry (well, maybe after the bar shuts down), and emotion seems to carry the day, night, and early morning. For me, it involved watching one of my best friends and his wife for¬ malize the love that's existed be¬ tween them since the day their eyes met. It meant meeting two large families, and many new friends. It meant knowing that although he'll always be my friend, it'll somehow be different. Not bad... just differ¬ ent. I'm 28 years old. You couldn't tell by my articles, I'm sure, but you could by the number of friends I have, both new and old who I have that have tied thejtnot, broken the glass, and lit the candle. Twenty- eight and single, and all the time wondering at life. The bachelor par¬ ties are few and far between now. Instead, birth announcements arrive every" few months. Ydung children struggle to say "Uncle Ingemar." I write this article looking out a window. I wonder whose wedding I will attend next and when. I won¬ der which families I will meet, which nationalities will come to¬ gether to celebrate, and to who I will lose this friend. Perhaps I'm running out of single friends. Per¬ haps I'm next. Maybe tomorrow I will meet the woman of my dreams and we'll run out and get married to. Then people can come together, if only for one night, and enjoy one another's company, perhaps she'd a tear or two for our loss, and go Please see WEDDING page 4. WHAT'S THE DXFFBRENCa B£Tv/E&rt/VBlSNDE WOMAN & QJ-? -THE BLCWf^ CWN't WV£ AHVHORE. ■k Crimes need reclassification to keep 'Three-Strikes' viable By Joel Eanes Special to The Daily Collegian We've all heard the horror sto¬ ries about the three strikes law for criminal sentencing. Even since the legislature enacted it in March, 1994, convicts have been sentenced to twenty-five years to life, some¬ times for a minor offense. While these stories ignore the fact that such people would also have to have been convicted of at least two felonies, they still expose a basic problem in California criminal law: the flawed classification of offenses into felonies and misdemeanors. The three strikes law works as follows. To state the idea very gen¬ erally, a first strike penalty is pre¬ served from pre-1994 law. The pen¬ alty for a second strike is twice the penalty for the first. The penalty for a third strike' is twenty-five years to life, provided that at least two of the three strikes are felonies. Each of those provisions has limited ex¬ ceptions, but this is the general rule. The root of the controversy is the possibility that the third strike can be a misdemeanor, and sometimes a very minor one. What are felonies and misde¬ meanors? Generally, a felony is an offense punishable by a year or more of imprisonment or probation; a misdemeanor is an offense pun¬ ishable by less that a year of im¬ prisonment or probation, or onlj\ by a fine or community service. Any violent crime is by definition a felony, as are serious but non-vio¬ lent crimes. The rest are misde¬ meanors. V The problem, as far as three strikes is concerned, is that California's list of misdemeanors includes many offenses that are as serious as felonies, and also many ' minor offenses that could theoreti¬ cally, but not realistically, result in prison sentences (this is the state prison, not the county jail, which is run under a separate law). A per¬ son who is convicted of such an offense has no realistic possibility of prison time, unless that person has two felony strikes, in which case a misdemeanor suddenly leads to a lengthy prison sentence. This can include people whose felonies were committed decades ago. In addition, when the legislature first laid out the classification of felo¬ nies and misd^racajuus, tjaj&c, strikesdidn'fexTst;soTRTelas^Tr" ' cation was simply not made with three strikes considerations in mind No one looked at how including minor misdemeanors with serious ones would affect sentencing or re¬ peat offenders. California could classify as a felony any offense that carries a realistic probability (not a theoreti¬ cal possibility) of state prison time as a sentence. This would npt in¬ clude county jail sentences or jail¬ ing pending arraignment or trial (three strikes already allows first strike sentences of probation). The new list would include the current roster of felonies, as well as seri¬ ous misdemeanors. It would not include in the new felony list mis¬ demeanors that require restitution but not separation from society - i.e.. non-paid parking tickets. The three strikes law could then be amended to require that all three be of the reclassified felonies. This is Please see EANES page 4. Daily Collegian California State University, Fresno — Sports Editor Tom Sepulveda Web Production Jason Maggini Production Manager Monica Stanford Editor in Chief Jevon C. Swanson Managing Editor Robert Bilvado News Editor Jim Ward Ad Manager Paul McCauley Business Manager Kari L. Scott Photo Editor Paul Martinez Copy Editor Elena Langdon Staff Writers: Man Kreamer, Ruthie Longley, Man Hart, Heather Hartman, Rosanne Tolosa, Hadi Yazdanpanah Sports Writers: Brooke Holve, Luis Hernandez, Erik Pfeifle, Casey Angle, Matt Lievre, Woody Miner, Matt Croce Circulation: Elena Langdon The Daily Collegian is published five times a week for and by the students of California State University. Fresno. Opinions expressed in the Collegian are not necessarily those of the entire Daily Collegian staff The editors reserve the right to edit letters for length and clarity. To be considered for publication. letters must be typed and should not exceed 250 words News: Sports: Advertising: FAX: TrVpbooe Directory: (209)278-5732 (209)278-2486 (209)278-5733 (209)278-5731 (209)278-2679 WWW: http-7/www.csufresno.edu/Collegian |