December 1, 1994, Page 2 |
Previous | 2 of 84 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
.-> . \ •> - Page 2 OPINION Thursday, December 1,1994 . - Election is over, fight continues The elections havepassed, and as horrific as they turned out, I would be naive to believe that any significant change would have occurred if the other major party had won, or rather, at a broader level, maintained office. .The facts remain that the hostile climate towards people of color, in particular, has not changed, and recently has worsened. The elections are over, and though wehad little(if any choice) that day, we make choices daily that are just as impacting. For example, when we go to eat, shop, or any other free mar¬ ket form of exchange, we make choicesaboutour lives. Wehardly think about them, and I concede that I had not given them much time until lately, but the support of large multi-national corpora¬ tions says many things about our political consciousness. Many, if not all, major corpora¬ tions donate money Jo political parties. LEFT UP FRONT By Esteban Licea By sup- — porting cer¬ tain corporations, we in turn sup¬ port certain political figures and propositions. For example, student 'A' buys a mondo taco, then Mondo corporation donates mondo dollars to candidate X and then candidate 'X' shafts student 'A.' If this sounds like a vicious cycle, it is. Don't kid yourself. Jtmay seem hopeless, but there's a weapon at our disposal. What I've — bym^boy- cott, then I probably shouldn't engage in the activity. v, It's through this prodding that I discovered something significant enough to permanently boycott cor¬ porations that supported discrimi¬ natory, prejudicial, racist, or in some way, hostile agendas to struggles of working people, students and his¬ torically marginalized communi¬ ties. "The elections are over, and though we had little (if any choice) that day, we make choices daily that are just as impacting." been fluttering around is what's commonly called a boycott. What¬ ever image this invokes in your mind, I know for me, I originally thought of it as a political move that was of no use. I thought that it was useless to attempt to boycott corporations be- causelfigured thatitwouldn'tmake any difference. 1 figured I suffered more than they could. I thought about the "harm principle" ancj its concept that if I, as an individual, suffered more than Corporation X Keeping to my individual line, I could not consciously go to an exploitive corporation and support them, even though I may suffer more. I concede that I used to drink Pepsi daily, and eat at Taco Bell with uncommon regularity, but I can no longer support this corpora-, tion. I may suffer higher food prices, and have to search harder for Royal Crown cola, but that's something that I'm fully prepared to do. I cannot consciously spend my dollars at a business that supports the divisiveness of an initiative like Proposition 187, or a gover¬ nor who's hostile towards educa¬ tion, health care and the progres¬ sion of people of color within society. These corporations that strip us of our last remaining dollars are all around us, and I would again be naive if I claimed that it'd beeasy to boycott theseblood- sucking corporations. They're all around us. Pepsi Co., for example, supported Prop. 187, Pete Wilson and similar right wing ideologues. Coca-Cola Co., has been just as guilty, having had a large investment in South Africa, and a clear hand in apart¬ heid: The list of these corporations is long, but is readily available/It's from this data we can base a stra¬ tegic assault on these corpora¬ tions that bleed Third World countries, permanently enslaving them to poverty, illiteracy, dis¬ ease and famine. While here on the home front, they deceive us into believing that all is grand. Sure, at a superficial level, I suffer, but at a deeper politically conscious, huhtthitar- ian level, I thrive and empower myself. —LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 'Critical thinking' more than just buzz words ' Dear Editor We should all be thankful for Jeff Smith's lesson about critical thinking appearing in your pa- tsday, November 29. This I an excellent example of g that is anything but criti¬ llike his reading of Mr. Albuquerque'sarticlethedaybe- fore, we don't have to read Mr. Smith's twice to come to thisbon- clusion. \ ) Critical thinking would imply mat Mr. Smith had considered Mr. Albuquerque's comments point by point, occasioned a little study or even research of tl\e article's validity, and only then to have sat down to write (sitting down might ensure any future thinking he imparts comes from his head). Givingthebenefitof$hedoubt, Mr. Smith's is also a good ex¬ ample of writing that appears designed to confound his read¬ ers with distractions. Just keep people muddling over nonsense and they won't have time to think clearly themselves. This tactic is •much in vogue these days on radio and TV, the place where Mr. Smith says he gets his views on humanity every night Or, giv- See Critical, Page 4 IfyouwoJd I<b your letter printed h THE COLLEGIAN, dep off a a^ aft our office h tie Keate Buking ^ Mai Step #42. Flag burning offensive, Prop 187 not a racist issue t Dear Editor, I happened to see a copy of the Fresno State Collegian newspa¬ per dated Nov. 11,1994. I Was horrified and angered by what I saw on the cover! Burning the American flag, symbolizing what our country stands for (and incidentally, what these people want for them- -x selves), is, in itself, a lesson in hypocrisy! Most of what was quoted by perpetrators in the newspaper was ridiculous—this is not a ra¬ cial issue! I (and everyone I krow who voted for Propositioivq87) would be against any illegal per¬ sons, be they white, brown or black, who felt that they were eligible for certain taxpayer ser¬ vices mandated for U.S. citizens only. It's these same citizens who pay for the above out of their Reader defends columnist's ideology Dear Editor, This letter intendas to be a simple request, it's in response to an item written by Tammy Martinez. Your criticism to the very brave and well-written edi¬ torial by Esteban Licea is a hor¬ rendous display of ignoranee. Mr. Licea, vvtiom I've had the the pleasure to have met recently, is a man of principles with a mind * of his own. Be sure that if every¬ one in this state woiild contem-1 plate the san ie education and in¬ tellectual capacity as Mr. Licea, despicable measures like Prop. 187 would not even be a matter to be discussed. y? . hard-earned pay checks. Our Constitution designates that we take care of our own with our taxes and not those that are in our country illegally! , I'm proud to say that the vot¬ ers of California finally had the guts to say "No" to the free load¬ ers who are in part responsible for bankrupting our state. "• > See Flag, Page 4 In your jungle-like form of so¬ ciety, Martinez, "based on the principle of survival of the fit¬ test," people like you, incapable to perform any sort of critical thinking, should be the first to meet extinction, as Had the Ape EDITOR IN CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR NEWS EDITOR DITOR • BRY. M.CRISITNA MEDINA OLIVIA REYES WALSH •ITOR • ROBB1 >ITOR • JOER( AGER • RI( AGER • BRAD1 [AGER • RU! iITORS • LAI • TIMS] See Fittest, Page 4 STAFF WRITERS: Paulo Albuquerque, CB Mfife Ang, Casey Angle, Adam Brady, Dennis Claborn, StacJEomp, Charlton Jordan, David Chavez, Chad Holcomb, Mam Hugo. Raina Jennings, Esteban li,ea Draegcr M..rtincz,;Biko Ohannessian, Beatrice Olivera, Leah Perich, Mitch Prince, T.rin Smith, George Smith, JcfF Smith, Tricia Smith, Pete Stewart, Annette Thiessen, Lai Yen Wong PHOTOGRAPPIERS: Steve R. Fujimoro, tomtny Monreal,'\ Zia Nizami, RtfSty Robison, Todd Warshaw. ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES: Dermis Claborn. David Fakhri,NinaMomjian, Zakiah Jusuf. i a «**V lot and by the jN iKfXnrcnuiiH/Kllccuvtol'dJBihr^Brou.EClAN naff. T*t' id ct|h«r. To br conujNIft puHtMM. fctten mini b« typed •na inouia not noted 2 SO -ronk. Letten «o tfic editor, comment.. Hitwnption Mid ad.™*..!,, infornuuon cm be dueoedto KfATSCAMPUSBUILDIfJG.MAILSTOP42.CSUFRESNO.FRESNO.CA,Foencw,lv.ciB(2fl9) l?»Ulb For»dYemungr»tiall(¥»)J»»-VSI • •PUBLISHED BY TOE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS. INC- •V. V-i •«. 4 7
Object Description
Title | 1994_12 The Daily Collegian December 1994 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | December 1, 1994, Page 2 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | .-> . \ •> - Page 2 OPINION Thursday, December 1,1994 . - Election is over, fight continues The elections havepassed, and as horrific as they turned out, I would be naive to believe that any significant change would have occurred if the other major party had won, or rather, at a broader level, maintained office. .The facts remain that the hostile climate towards people of color, in particular, has not changed, and recently has worsened. The elections are over, and though wehad little(if any choice) that day, we make choices daily that are just as impacting. For example, when we go to eat, shop, or any other free mar¬ ket form of exchange, we make choicesaboutour lives. Wehardly think about them, and I concede that I had not given them much time until lately, but the support of large multi-national corpora¬ tions says many things about our political consciousness. Many, if not all, major corpora¬ tions donate money Jo political parties. LEFT UP FRONT By Esteban Licea By sup- — porting cer¬ tain corporations, we in turn sup¬ port certain political figures and propositions. For example, student 'A' buys a mondo taco, then Mondo corporation donates mondo dollars to candidate X and then candidate 'X' shafts student 'A.' If this sounds like a vicious cycle, it is. Don't kid yourself. Jtmay seem hopeless, but there's a weapon at our disposal. What I've — bym^boy- cott, then I probably shouldn't engage in the activity. v, It's through this prodding that I discovered something significant enough to permanently boycott cor¬ porations that supported discrimi¬ natory, prejudicial, racist, or in some way, hostile agendas to struggles of working people, students and his¬ torically marginalized communi¬ ties. "The elections are over, and though we had little (if any choice) that day, we make choices daily that are just as impacting." been fluttering around is what's commonly called a boycott. What¬ ever image this invokes in your mind, I know for me, I originally thought of it as a political move that was of no use. I thought that it was useless to attempt to boycott corporations be- causelfigured thatitwouldn'tmake any difference. 1 figured I suffered more than they could. I thought about the "harm principle" ancj its concept that if I, as an individual, suffered more than Corporation X Keeping to my individual line, I could not consciously go to an exploitive corporation and support them, even though I may suffer more. I concede that I used to drink Pepsi daily, and eat at Taco Bell with uncommon regularity, but I can no longer support this corpora-, tion. I may suffer higher food prices, and have to search harder for Royal Crown cola, but that's something that I'm fully prepared to do. I cannot consciously spend my dollars at a business that supports the divisiveness of an initiative like Proposition 187, or a gover¬ nor who's hostile towards educa¬ tion, health care and the progres¬ sion of people of color within society. These corporations that strip us of our last remaining dollars are all around us, and I would again be naive if I claimed that it'd beeasy to boycott theseblood- sucking corporations. They're all around us. Pepsi Co., for example, supported Prop. 187, Pete Wilson and similar right wing ideologues. Coca-Cola Co., has been just as guilty, having had a large investment in South Africa, and a clear hand in apart¬ heid: The list of these corporations is long, but is readily available/It's from this data we can base a stra¬ tegic assault on these corpora¬ tions that bleed Third World countries, permanently enslaving them to poverty, illiteracy, dis¬ ease and famine. While here on the home front, they deceive us into believing that all is grand. Sure, at a superficial level, I suffer, but at a deeper politically conscious, huhtthitar- ian level, I thrive and empower myself. —LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 'Critical thinking' more than just buzz words ' Dear Editor We should all be thankful for Jeff Smith's lesson about critical thinking appearing in your pa- tsday, November 29. This I an excellent example of g that is anything but criti¬ llike his reading of Mr. Albuquerque'sarticlethedaybe- fore, we don't have to read Mr. Smith's twice to come to thisbon- clusion. \ ) Critical thinking would imply mat Mr. Smith had considered Mr. Albuquerque's comments point by point, occasioned a little study or even research of tl\e article's validity, and only then to have sat down to write (sitting down might ensure any future thinking he imparts comes from his head). Givingthebenefitof$hedoubt, Mr. Smith's is also a good ex¬ ample of writing that appears designed to confound his read¬ ers with distractions. Just keep people muddling over nonsense and they won't have time to think clearly themselves. This tactic is •much in vogue these days on radio and TV, the place where Mr. Smith says he gets his views on humanity every night Or, giv- See Critical, Page 4 IfyouwoJd I See Flag, Page 4 In your jungle-like form of so¬ ciety, Martinez, "based on the principle of survival of the fit¬ test," people like you, incapable to perform any sort of critical thinking, should be the first to meet extinction, as Had the Ape EDITOR IN CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR NEWS EDITOR DITOR • BRY. M.CRISITNA MEDINA OLIVIA REYES WALSH •ITOR • ROBB1 >ITOR • JOER( AGER • RI( AGER • BRAD1 [AGER • RU! iITORS • LAI • TIMS] See Fittest, Page 4 STAFF WRITERS: Paulo Albuquerque, CB Mfife Ang, Casey Angle, Adam Brady, Dennis Claborn, StacJEomp, Charlton Jordan, David Chavez, Chad Holcomb, Mam Hugo. Raina Jennings, Esteban li,ea Draegcr M..rtincz,;Biko Ohannessian, Beatrice Olivera, Leah Perich, Mitch Prince, T.rin Smith, George Smith, JcfF Smith, Tricia Smith, Pete Stewart, Annette Thiessen, Lai Yen Wong PHOTOGRAPPIERS: Steve R. Fujimoro, tomtny Monreal,'\ Zia Nizami, RtfSty Robison, Todd Warshaw. ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES: Dermis Claborn. David Fakhri,NinaMomjian, Zakiah Jusuf. i a «**V lot and by the jN iKfXnrcnuiiH/Kllccuvtol'dJBihr^Brou.EClAN naff. T*t' id ct|h«r. To br conujNIft puHtMM. fctten mini b« typed •na inouia not noted 2 SO -ronk. Letten «o tfic editor, comment.. Hitwnption Mid ad.™*..!,, infornuuon cm be dueoedto KfATSCAMPUSBUILDIfJG.MAILSTOP42.CSUFRESNO.FRESNO.CA,Foencw,lv.ciB(2fl9) l?»Ulb For»dYemungr»tiall(¥»)J»»-VSI • •PUBLISHED BY TOE ASSOCIATED STUDENTS. INC- •V. V-i •«. 4 7 |