December 2, 1994, Page 2 |
Previous | 10 of 84 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Page 2 . _/ e—— ... s OPINION Friday, December 2, 1994 ' •' AS I SEE IT fi* Republicans should be Statesman Almost a month has now passed since the Nov. 8 elections and the dust isbeginning to settle. The new Senators and Congress¬ men, the vast majority of whom v, are Republican, have come from the far reaches of this great re¬ public and have relocate^ in Washington D.C. It has been noted that there has not been a Republican rnajority inboth houses of Congress since PresidentHarry S. Truman occu¬ pied the White House more than 40 years ago. Because of this, the Republi¬ cans are going to have to learn not just to be good politicians,- but good statesman as well. Why? Be¬ cause they hataMttoved from playing the op¬ position minority tobeingthepower majority. They have to remember that the words they speak, espe- cially the committee chairman, carry a great deal more weight now than before. Jessie Helms is an example of this. While his remarks concerning old Bill were not a wise thing to say, heshouldnotbekeptfrom thechair- manship of the Foreign Relations Committee. By Tim Springer How¬ ever, he does need to ' learn how to be a good statesman by measur¬ ing the words he uses on and off the record. The Re- publicans have the opportunity to effectively change government for the better, if they're willing to bite the bullet by cutting the size of their own salaries, office budgets and staff sizes along with any other cuts they make in other government expenditure?* such as social spending and "pork barreling." The mark of a wise states¬ man is that he's willing to and does include himself under the laws he passes for the nation he governs. As a conservative (in the Arthur Vandenberg vein) this colum¬ nist will be watching closely the proposals and progress that the Republicans make toward ful¬ filling th6ir campaign promises and the "Contract With America." The single most important thing they muist do is lead. They must take up the initiative, chart a clear course and not get too bogged down in the tangent is- , sues that are present in Wash¬ ington D.C, such as White Wa¬ ter or Cartlegate. >.. The people of this country have indicated that they want a change in the way government works and does business. No more "business as usual." It seems that the Republicans have rolled up their sleeves and are off to a good start. The main thing now is to keep the momen¬ tum going and at the same time be quick studies on the'art of being good statesmen and good leaders. ' -LETTERS TO THE EDITOR- Dear Editor: I would like thank President Clinton for being so decisive and quick to react to the situation in Haiti, but I can't. For the past few months, Mr. Clinton has success¬ fully shown the American public just how indecisive and shaky of a leader he truly is. Going into the Presidential race, Clinton was al¬ ready weak when it came to for¬ eign policy because he lacked ex¬ perience. His indecision with the Haiti situation has only cemented this criticism, instead of shacking it. Why he decided to go into Haiti, nobody knows for sure. According to the New York Times • (9-l7), PresidentClinton couldn't comeiup with a "compelling rea¬ son why a tiny nation whose economy is in shambles and whose military is far inferior of our own," posed any risk to our national security. Instead/-Mr. Clinton f ocused on the inhumane treatment of Haitians. The same treatment people in Bosnia and Rwanda are facing at this very i moment But, you don't see the U.S. intervening over there. The New York Times (9-19), also stated that the only reason President Clinton could think of, was "to secure our borders." In other words, to stop the flow of poor, sick and uneducated people into America. However, if that were the case, American troops would have been sent into Mexico v a long time ago to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. The more I look at President Clinton's actions, the more I won¬ der about his decision making skills. By stretching out this Whole Haitian ordeal over a year with ultimatums, along with not let¬ ting the American public know why we are involved, has only hurt Mr. Clinton's character. Despite these criticisms of the President, I do believe what Mr. Clinton did in Haiti was worth¬ while: for the mere fact that he was able to restore democracy, and-to ensure the basic human right of freedom. However, I sin¬ cerely hope that the next time a person's freedoms are being taken away or challenged, the President will intervene with more decisiveness. Maybe then, Mr. Clinton won't be portrayed as a floating waffle. SinceretyYoufs, Caleb Randal/V Dear Editor, The AIDS epidemic has ere-' ated such a scare in the commu¬ nity that many people are con¬ sidering making testing for the virus mandatory in the health professions. Since a Florida den¬ tist infected five of his parents with the HIV virus last year, medi¬ cal experts have intensely debated the need for practice restrictions on HIV-infected surgeons. This debate is for a very good reason: the danger is that "health work¬ ers" are infecting their patients. As of Dec. 1,1990, there h#'e been 40 documented cases of health care workers infected with AIDS (Modern Health Care. 10- 91). But what about the health care workers who fail to docu¬ ment their condition, like the Florida dentist? What we are deal¬ ing with is millions of patients' innocent lives. We, the patients, have the right to know if our doctors and nurses have the AIDS virus. How ironic it would be if we were to turn to our doctors or dentists for help, only to realize they were doing just die oppo¬ site: putting our lives in jeop¬ ardy. Everyone in the health profes- yr*. ♦ sion should be tested for the HIV virus, not only for their own good, but for innocent patients who are depending on them* We should be able to trust our health care workers. Some say that there are always two sides to an issue. In this case, it would be the doctors' right to privacy. However, I feel that on this issue, a patient's right to know outweighs the doctor's privacy. The main argument that I would like to address is that pa¬ tients have rights. By law, every health professional is required to take care of his or her patients. As Judge Phillip Carehman stated in Vic American Journal of Nursing, "Patient's rights must prevail." If they don't, "the risk to the pa¬ tients is so absolute, so devastat¬ ing, that it is untenable to argue against informed consent com¬ bined with a restriction on proce¬ dures which present 'any risk' to the patient." Every patient has the right to be given good care; and the right to know if their health professionals are infected with HIV or not falls under that right. My second argument is that, in the long run, both the health care worker and the patient would benefit from it. If AIDS testing was mandatory in health professions, it would weed out all the health care workers who are carrying the disease, there¬ fore providing no threat vto pa¬ tients' lives. It would also benefit thfe health care worker by en¬ abling him or her to know of their condition, and begin treatment fis soon as possible. ' * - I fully believe that mandatory "AIDS testing would give a pa¬ tient comfort of mind, and put the meaning of trust back in the health care profession. Sincerely, CalebRandallV \ C JLn The COLLEGIAN Ifyouwodd Ice your letter printed in THE COLLEGIAN, dopoffa copy at our office h the Keats Buidng (by the fountain) or mai it to MaiStop#42 . COLLEGil 1'CALIFORNIA'S TATE* EDITOR IN CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR NEWS EDITOR rt^DTO EDITOR SPORTS EDITOR ENTERTAnvMhfcDITOR ADVERTISIK nBnaGER BUSINlB nBnager productkB nBnager B E UNIVERSITY • F RfcSNO; M. CRISTOMA MEDINA OLIVIA REYES STEPHEN WALSH BRYA1*CHXN ROBB'rfjMtNER JOE ROSATO JR. RICHARD IjtiXON BRADFORD WILSON RUSTY KOH&DN LALTUEGirebN TIM SPRINGER STAFF WRrTERSt;Pau!o Albuquerque, Chl»i Mint; An«j, C.^ey Angle, Adam Brady, Dennis Claborn, Stacy Comp, Charlton Jordan, David Charaz, Chad Holcomb, Maria Hugo, Raina Jennings, Esteban ticca, Draeger Martinez, pikoOhannessian, Beatrice Olivera, Leah Perich, Mitch Prince, Erin Smith, George Smith, JcfFSmith, Tricia Smith, Pete Stewart, Annette Thiessen, Lai Yen Worig PHOTOGRAPHERS: Steve R. Fujimoto, Tommy Monreal. Zia Nizami, Rusty Robison, Todd Warshaw.' *"\J ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES: Dennis C! .born. David FakhnVNinaMomjian, Zakiah Jusuf. THI COLLEGIAN ,. pgltftd fert.met a «ei fo, .nd by ,he ..uJem.tfCjl.romi. <.-« Un,«n. ,. F«-,no (>|«n,^,r,pfc.^d.nT»«OOUjftAN,rrivMn«t^..lrfrfl«.«of.l<«i(1hraKir. >LLECIYI «»* The rdmx ,c<,vr» ,h» ,rhf renfii knirlfcrVnph lmJ damy To he coniKfrwrl (fcr fmbMri letter, muu be typed .ndUKKid»oee««d2y)«idi.Lnitntoih«ediio?.comme«iBib«f.ptK>niiidW. ' nK .nfomurton can he d.i««dtu:KEATSCAMPUSBUILOING.MAILTror42.CSUFR£SNO.FRtSNO I < F«new.iB.uU(209» m-2416 t~ -■> « "~" ■ •PUBLISHED B 01(209)271 V5I TH ELA S SOC I > TED STUOE-. \. INC '.J. ."?
Object Description
Title | 1994_12 The Daily Collegian December 1994 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | December 2, 1994, Page 2 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | Page 2 . _/ e—— ... s OPINION Friday, December 2, 1994 ' •' AS I SEE IT fi* Republicans should be Statesman Almost a month has now passed since the Nov. 8 elections and the dust isbeginning to settle. The new Senators and Congress¬ men, the vast majority of whom v, are Republican, have come from the far reaches of this great re¬ public and have relocate^ in Washington D.C. It has been noted that there has not been a Republican rnajority inboth houses of Congress since PresidentHarry S. Truman occu¬ pied the White House more than 40 years ago. Because of this, the Republi¬ cans are going to have to learn not just to be good politicians,- but good statesman as well. Why? Be¬ cause they hataMttoved from playing the op¬ position minority tobeingthepower majority. They have to remember that the words they speak, espe- cially the committee chairman, carry a great deal more weight now than before. Jessie Helms is an example of this. While his remarks concerning old Bill were not a wise thing to say, heshouldnotbekeptfrom thechair- manship of the Foreign Relations Committee. By Tim Springer How¬ ever, he does need to ' learn how to be a good statesman by measur¬ ing the words he uses on and off the record. The Re- publicans have the opportunity to effectively change government for the better, if they're willing to bite the bullet by cutting the size of their own salaries, office budgets and staff sizes along with any other cuts they make in other government expenditure?* such as social spending and "pork barreling." The mark of a wise states¬ man is that he's willing to and does include himself under the laws he passes for the nation he governs. As a conservative (in the Arthur Vandenberg vein) this colum¬ nist will be watching closely the proposals and progress that the Republicans make toward ful¬ filling th6ir campaign promises and the "Contract With America." The single most important thing they muist do is lead. They must take up the initiative, chart a clear course and not get too bogged down in the tangent is- , sues that are present in Wash¬ ington D.C, such as White Wa¬ ter or Cartlegate. >.. The people of this country have indicated that they want a change in the way government works and does business. No more "business as usual." It seems that the Republicans have rolled up their sleeves and are off to a good start. The main thing now is to keep the momen¬ tum going and at the same time be quick studies on the'art of being good statesmen and good leaders. ' -LETTERS TO THE EDITOR- Dear Editor: I would like thank President Clinton for being so decisive and quick to react to the situation in Haiti, but I can't. For the past few months, Mr. Clinton has success¬ fully shown the American public just how indecisive and shaky of a leader he truly is. Going into the Presidential race, Clinton was al¬ ready weak when it came to for¬ eign policy because he lacked ex¬ perience. His indecision with the Haiti situation has only cemented this criticism, instead of shacking it. Why he decided to go into Haiti, nobody knows for sure. According to the New York Times • (9-l7), PresidentClinton couldn't comeiup with a "compelling rea¬ son why a tiny nation whose economy is in shambles and whose military is far inferior of our own," posed any risk to our national security. Instead/-Mr. Clinton f ocused on the inhumane treatment of Haitians. The same treatment people in Bosnia and Rwanda are facing at this very i moment But, you don't see the U.S. intervening over there. The New York Times (9-19), also stated that the only reason President Clinton could think of, was "to secure our borders." In other words, to stop the flow of poor, sick and uneducated people into America. However, if that were the case, American troops would have been sent into Mexico v a long time ago to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. The more I look at President Clinton's actions, the more I won¬ der about his decision making skills. By stretching out this Whole Haitian ordeal over a year with ultimatums, along with not let¬ ting the American public know why we are involved, has only hurt Mr. Clinton's character. Despite these criticisms of the President, I do believe what Mr. Clinton did in Haiti was worth¬ while: for the mere fact that he was able to restore democracy, and-to ensure the basic human right of freedom. However, I sin¬ cerely hope that the next time a person's freedoms are being taken away or challenged, the President will intervene with more decisiveness. Maybe then, Mr. Clinton won't be portrayed as a floating waffle. SinceretyYoufs, Caleb Randal/V Dear Editor, The AIDS epidemic has ere-' ated such a scare in the commu¬ nity that many people are con¬ sidering making testing for the virus mandatory in the health professions. Since a Florida den¬ tist infected five of his parents with the HIV virus last year, medi¬ cal experts have intensely debated the need for practice restrictions on HIV-infected surgeons. This debate is for a very good reason: the danger is that "health work¬ ers" are infecting their patients. As of Dec. 1,1990, there h#'e been 40 documented cases of health care workers infected with AIDS (Modern Health Care. 10- 91). But what about the health care workers who fail to docu¬ ment their condition, like the Florida dentist? What we are deal¬ ing with is millions of patients' innocent lives. We, the patients, have the right to know if our doctors and nurses have the AIDS virus. How ironic it would be if we were to turn to our doctors or dentists for help, only to realize they were doing just die oppo¬ site: putting our lives in jeop¬ ardy. Everyone in the health profes- yr*. ♦ sion should be tested for the HIV virus, not only for their own good, but for innocent patients who are depending on them* We should be able to trust our health care workers. Some say that there are always two sides to an issue. In this case, it would be the doctors' right to privacy. However, I feel that on this issue, a patient's right to know outweighs the doctor's privacy. The main argument that I would like to address is that pa¬ tients have rights. By law, every health professional is required to take care of his or her patients. As Judge Phillip Carehman stated in Vic American Journal of Nursing, "Patient's rights must prevail." If they don't, "the risk to the pa¬ tients is so absolute, so devastat¬ ing, that it is untenable to argue against informed consent com¬ bined with a restriction on proce¬ dures which present 'any risk' to the patient." Every patient has the right to be given good care; and the right to know if their health professionals are infected with HIV or not falls under that right. My second argument is that, in the long run, both the health care worker and the patient would benefit from it. If AIDS testing was mandatory in health professions, it would weed out all the health care workers who are carrying the disease, there¬ fore providing no threat vto pa¬ tients' lives. It would also benefit thfe health care worker by en¬ abling him or her to know of their condition, and begin treatment fis soon as possible. ' * - I fully believe that mandatory "AIDS testing would give a pa¬ tient comfort of mind, and put the meaning of trust back in the health care profession. Sincerely, CalebRandallV \ C JLn The COLLEGIAN Ifyouwodd Ice your letter printed in THE COLLEGIAN, dopoffa copy at our office h the Keats Buidng (by the fountain) or mai it to MaiStop#42 . COLLEGil 1'CALIFORNIA'S TATE* EDITOR IN CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR NEWS EDITOR rt^DTO EDITOR SPORTS EDITOR ENTERTAnvMhfcDITOR ADVERTISIK nBnaGER BUSINlB nBnager productkB nBnager B E UNIVERSITY • F RfcSNO; M. CRISTOMA MEDINA OLIVIA REYES STEPHEN WALSH BRYA1*CHXN ROBB'rfjMtNER JOE ROSATO JR. RICHARD IjtiXON BRADFORD WILSON RUSTY KOH&DN LALTUEGirebN TIM SPRINGER STAFF WRrTERSt;Pau!o Albuquerque, Chl»i Mint; An«j, C.^ey Angle, Adam Brady, Dennis Claborn, Stacy Comp, Charlton Jordan, David Charaz, Chad Holcomb, Maria Hugo, Raina Jennings, Esteban ticca, Draeger Martinez, pikoOhannessian, Beatrice Olivera, Leah Perich, Mitch Prince, Erin Smith, George Smith, JcfFSmith, Tricia Smith, Pete Stewart, Annette Thiessen, Lai Yen Worig PHOTOGRAPHERS: Steve R. Fujimoto, Tommy Monreal. Zia Nizami, Rusty Robison, Todd Warshaw.' *"\J ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES: Dennis C! .born. David FakhnVNinaMomjian, Zakiah Jusuf. THI COLLEGIAN ,. pgltftd fert.met a «ei fo, .nd by ,he ..uJem.tfCjl.romi. <.-« Un,«n. ,. F«-,no (>|«n,^,r,pfc.^d.nT»«OOUjftAN,rrivMn«t^..lrfrfl«.«of.l<«i(1hraKir. >LLECIYI «»* The rdmx ,c<,vr» ,h» ,rhf renfii knirlfcrVnph lmJ damy To he coniKfrwrl (fcr fmbMri letter, muu be typed .ndUKKid»oee««d2y)«idi.Lnitntoih«ediio?.comme«iBib«f.ptK>niiidW. ' nK .nfomurton can he d.i««dtu:KEATSCAMPUSBUILOING.MAILTror42.CSUFR£SNO.FRtSNO I < F«new.iB.uU(209» m-2416 t~ -■> « "~" ■ •PUBLISHED B 01(209)271 V5I TH ELA S SOC I > TED STUOE-. \. INC '.J. ."? |