002_Insight Oct 05 1994 p 2 |
Previous | 2 of 40 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Page 2 EDITORIAL CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY. FRESNO October 5,1994 INSIGHT Letters to the Editor Students rewrite history Dear Editor, I write to you in regard to the editorial of Lisa Wackowski, in the Sept. 28 edition of the Insight I have grave concerns over this editorial due to the fact that this opinion piece was either poorly researched or the author just did not care about truth and facts. The author claimed that Reality members referred to the daycare center as the dog care center. This never happened. Actually, there was an article in The Edge that claimed that now that our children are being taken care of in the child care center the school was going to provide care services for those who had to leave their pets borne all day. This article was a spoof designed around exaggeration. Humor, get a sense of it Secondly, petting zoos, of which the author apparently has never heard of, are fairly common at major zoos such as the San Diego Zoo. Once again, though, the article in The Edge, with a humorous poke, spoke about a petting zoo being located on the second floor of the library. This zoo was going to be run by Professor O. MacDonald and goats and cattle were going to be present. Also the article discussed the construction of a water slide in the library. Anyone, with any sense of critical thinking abilities, would be able to discern what these articles were about However, if someone wanted to use children in an inflammatory manner in order to be manipulative, then I guess one could come to another conclusion. Perhaps if the author had checked her sources and read theses articles herself she would not have supplied the author with a copy of the articles. Finally, I hope that in the future, the aspiring journalist of the Insight will show enough concern about the truth to check their facts. Steve Hauser Editors note: Steve Hauser is on the staff of The Edge. Dear Editor, I am a concerned first year student here at Fresno State. To be perfectly honest, at first, I considered Fresno State to be a place I could like, but I am not so sure now. I have begun to notice many things that are not right around the campus. Many people see what I see too. What is that? In my opinion, I see CSUF as a biased institute. Fresno State is biased against some departments and students. I myself see this first hand when I attend my Chicano Latin Studies class. My class is held in the San Ramon Building complex. One of the first things I first noticed the first day when I walked Dear Editor, Marlene Bryant's opinion piece of Sept. 21, "Unwed Married Couples Deserve Equal Rights," offered some interesting justification for giving unmarried, cohabiting persons equal benefits and 'rights.' Her point: not to do so is tantamount to discrimination and is a violation of such persons' pursuit of happiness. What she overlooks (perhaps the most important argument against her case) are the consequences of such living arrange- into class was the missing panels on the ceilings of the small room. The holes overhead are unpleasant to look at and unacceptable. Apparently, according to my sister, who has graduated in bilingual teaching, many times the San Ramon classrooms have been evacuated in the past when a terrible burning smell has filled the rooms. This abuse to the professors and students in those buildings truly upsets me! I have paid the inflated registration fees to get nothing in return. How can I be expected to attend a school that apparently neglects his professors and students? If my tuition is not going toward my classes, and obviously it isn't, where is it going? This is not the only class lhat lacks ments when they end: the increasing victimization of children who are the first to suffer and lose their 'rights.' Society has always had a keen interest in protecting the rights of children who were traditionally viewed as 'property.' The benefits given to persons embracing a traditional marriage commitment are designed to protect and promote the well-being of children. Despite the prominence of divorce and separation among traditionally married couples, children still have a better chance of being protected the attention of the administration, but so do my Biology classes. They lack the necessary equipment which is required to successfully and professionally complete such classes. This brings me to my next point. I cannot believe that professors are paid such non-existent rates but are also expected to teach in substandard conditions. What a slap in the face of both students and teachers! Please consider printing my concerns in your next issue. I also ask you to survey your readers and non-readers on this issue. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. Angelica Velazquez Biology major under those circumstances. The issue of abandonment and separation among unmarried, cohabiting couples is even more pronounced and poses a greater risk for children bom (or adopted) into these relationships. This not so much an argument against unmarried, cohabiting couples as it is in favor of persons who make the formal commitment through traditional marriage. Fr. Perry Kavookjian Pastor Newman Center Catholic Church OPINION Some facts in history are surprising. For instance, "In the Olympic Games, Greeks ran races, jumped, hurled the biscuits and threw the java." Uh, ex-squeeze me... baking powder? In a recent column in The Fresno Bee, CSUF professor Elvin Bell entertained readers with excerpts from high school final exams. Thus illustrating that, no matter how much teachers teach, students have selective learning abilities. This is true in history more than any other topic. Some students spend years sitting in cramped classrooms, with an unused pencil poised over a fresh seat of paper, with one eye on the clock and one eye on the professor. Thoughts of "Who cares who won the French-Singaporean War?" and "When is lunch?" pass through their feeble minds. I've taken more than a few classes in history. In fact, if I ever graduate, I '11 graduate with a minor in history. It makes me want to cry myself to sleep at night knowing that students can massacre any historical topic by believing things like "Sir Francis Drake circumcised the world with a 100-foot clipper." Had he really done that, I think Ju daism wouldn't have spread so quickly in the "New World." And, had that student actually cracked open that mysterious thing called a history book, their essay wouldn't have found its way into a column in The Bee. Okay, maybe history isn't the only topic that students ignore. English, unfortunately, is also less than a priority for some. Hence, "In one of Shakespeare's famous plays, Hamlet rations out his situation by relieving himself in a long soliloquy. In another. Lady Mac Beth tries to convince Hamlet to kill the king by attacking his manhood." My high school English teacher graded on a curve. Where was the author of that essay when I needed . him? Some students try to hide the fact that they never study and call for a little divine intervention by using things they learn in Sunday School. These students figure that if they talk about God, their teachers will forgive them for their ignorance. "Afterwards, Moses went up on Mount Cyanide to get the Ten Commandments. David was a Hebrew king skilled at playing the liar. He fought with the Philatelists, a race of people who lived in Biblical times." If I wrote that one, I wouldn't hold my breath for a miracle. Speaking of miracle, I consider it absolutely mind-boggling that the same type of students that wrote these horrific essays ever graduate and make it to college. But I know they're here. These are the students who, in their fifth year as a freshman, walk by the library and wonder what it looks like on the inside. "Must have lots of books and stuff," they think. Rather than check it out, they cruise down to Carl's Jr. for a burger, and pay with their huge financial aid checks that come out of the tax-payers pockets. These are also the students that benefit from the signs in the computer lab lhat point out where the power buttons are. Po-wer... follow the arrows. Idealistically, there's a cool thing called academic probation that should weed out the weaker students. A sort of discrimination for the criminally ignorant. I can understand having a bad semester, but for most people there is no excuse. Just the standard, run-of-the mill product when two stupid people have children. No more, no less. If people had to score a set score on an I.Q. test before they could have children, that would probably prevent overpopulation and the rest of us would have an infinite supply of oxygen. We'd all be better off. TOP TEN MOST COMMON MYTHS ABOUT HISTORY 10. King Henry Vm was a heterosexual. 9. Richard Nixon really didn'tknow anything about the break-in. 8. The Knights of the Round Table delivered pizzas by carriage. 7. Lt. Col. Oliver North was only following orders. 6. Christians love lions. 5. Hitler was a philanthropist. 4. Ronald Reagan could think for himself. 3. Columbus was exploring the South Pacific for the good of mankind. 2. Custer's last stand wasn't. 1. The Devil made Saddam do it Students strike out of funds Terese Farmen OPINION Three strikes,'and students may be out of a college education — not because students are suddenly becoming felons in mass quantities but because state funding will be allocated to afford the prison systems rather than to the universities, because of the three strikes law. How many students will be turned away from a higher education because California can no longer afford its crime rate with its established legislation? In an analysis written by the California Higher Educational Policy Center, released last Thursday, the costs of the prison system will rise from $2 billion to $3.5 billion within the next eight years. The reason: because of the implementation of the three strikes law. Salaries and egos take over pro sports felons will be required to serve longer sentences, thus using a substantial amount of state funds, countering the original goal of the law which was to keep repeat offenders off the streets. Unfortunately, many people did not consider the implications of such a goal. At the universities, to combat the lack of funds, enrollment will have to be restricted, tuition and fees will continue to escalate and taxes will also increase. What happens to those who are turned away from obtaining a higher education? They will become homeless, jobless and uneducated. Who's to say that crime won't triple in due time, because people will be forced to resort to other measures (illegal at times) in order to provide for their families? Three strikes is suffering an awful backlash. If only the government could keep the criminals at bay, California would shine above the rest. But, when half the population is paying taxes to support the other half of ihe population, then who's the winner and who's left holding the rotten potatoes? People have basically three options. The first option is to pay more taxes and higher fees in order to obtain and substantiate the three strikes law. Or, the voters could vote for a representative who favors the modification of the law. Finally, they could straighten up their acts by not parading around toking the crank, tapping the veins, looking for an excuse to start a Mississippi boy on fire, or shooting the neighborhood children in a drive- by shooting and pushing the drugs to Jane and Johnnie Kindergarten. And if so, than maybe, just maybe, every one could have an equal opportunity to achieve intellect and a chance to obtain freedom. This b America, isn't it? OPINION It's October, sports fans. Traditionally, the time of year signaling the close of one sport, baseball, and the beginning of two more, hockey and basketball. But this year, fans are in danger of experiencing the bleakest October in ninety years. In 1904, John McGraw refused to let his New York Giants play Boston in the World Series. McGraw reasoned that the Giants had won the pennant in the National League and had no reason to play the inferior AL champions. In 1994, it's the players who have declined to play. The reason given this year is the lack of a satisfactory collective bargaining agreement. With the remainder of the baseball season already lost, this October is already tarnished. But fans have adjusted and are prepared to follow othersports. Now, though, lt looks as if those same fans are in danger of losing hockey and possibly basketball later, if the owners decide to lock the players out The National Hockey League was scheduled to begin Oct 1. However, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman announced the opening of the season would be post poned for two weeks in order to work out a new collective bargaining agreement with the player's union. Bettman said he refused to let the season start without a contract, because he feared a players' strike sometime during the year. When the players assured the league they would not strike this year, Bettman refused their offer saying that it would only delay the inevitable. In each case, players are declining to sign an agreement with the owners, because they include terms such as salary caps and no arbitration. Players say the terms limit their earning potential and restrict their options to play wherever they choose. Owners say salaries have gotten out of control and must be restricted or else smaller markets will lose teams to low revenue. They're right. ... athletes get paid a tremendous amount of money to play a sport which most people play for free. Irronically, NHL players and owners are at odds over the same problems that ended the baseball season: small market teams losing money, salary caps, salary arbitration and tax Completing the trio, NBA owners are threatening a lockout of the players if a collective bargaining agreement cannot be reached. The NB A's agreement ended last June and talks have begun. But if history tells us anything, those talks will push players and owners further apart rather than closer to an agreement. New agreements, which include revenue sharing and salary caps are an attempt at helping small market teams survive while remaining in that small market The players argue they should not be forced to take apay cut because a team cannot survive in a given city. Some players suggest that struggling teams should move to other cities. Great solution guys. Apparently mete players can't remember back to the days when they loved their home team and would have mourned the loss forever. Re member the Brooklyn Dodgers, the New York Giants and the Washington Senators (twice)? The players claim they are being taken advantage of. They claim it is just another case of owners forcing labor to accept the terms offered. But let's keep some perspective. The average salary in baseball is over $1 million, the minimum is $109,000. The average NHL salary in 1993- 94 was $560,000; the minimum was $100,000. Basketball salaries have followed suit with the signings of players such as Larry Johnson for $84 million, AnferneeHardaway for $66 million and, most recently, a rookie. Grant Hill signed for $44 million. Labor, in this case, is not a group of coal miners or migrant farm workers attempting to reach a fair agreement and trying to earn a living. Even at the league minimum, atheletes get paid a tremendous amount of money to play a sport which most people play for free. The owners are not without fault Mistakes have been made, and they have cost each sport respectively. But at some point salaries and egos must return to Earth. The players must do their part Signing a collective bargaining agreement and returning to what they do best is a start. INSIGHT [CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO Department of. Mass Communication and Journalism CSUF, 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., Fresno, CA 93740-0010 News: 278-2892 Advertising: 278-3934 Lisa L. Alvey Belinda Lee David Mlrhadl Christine Malamanig NlkArif R. Sldek Shelly Silva Celeste Cox Maria Machuca Jason Glbbs Matt Soby Lupe Fuentes Mark Lawrence Yl Ping Ho Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor News Editor Copy Editor Graphic Design Editor Arts &• Entertainment Editor Editorial Page Editor Production Manager Sports Editor Photo Editor Advertising Account Manage Advertising Production Mgr. Circulation Manager PRODUCTION ASSISTANTS Shahada Abdul-Karim Kori Rianda Joe Rosato Jr. John Shaw ii\-imtiiHiiini11 ' Vi'it ■ikahtiii-rfri'
Object Description
Title | 1994_10 Insight October 1994 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Dept. of Journalism, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Weekly during the school year. Vol. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 8 1969-v. 29, no. 23 (May 13, 1998, issue. Title from masthead. Merged with Daily collegian. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodials |
Contributors | California State University, Fresno Dept. of Journalism |
Coverage | October 8, 1969 - May 13, 1998 |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi, TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | 002_Insight Oct 05 1994 p 2 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Full-Text-Search | Page 2 EDITORIAL CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY. FRESNO October 5,1994 INSIGHT Letters to the Editor Students rewrite history Dear Editor, I write to you in regard to the editorial of Lisa Wackowski, in the Sept. 28 edition of the Insight I have grave concerns over this editorial due to the fact that this opinion piece was either poorly researched or the author just did not care about truth and facts. The author claimed that Reality members referred to the daycare center as the dog care center. This never happened. Actually, there was an article in The Edge that claimed that now that our children are being taken care of in the child care center the school was going to provide care services for those who had to leave their pets borne all day. This article was a spoof designed around exaggeration. Humor, get a sense of it Secondly, petting zoos, of which the author apparently has never heard of, are fairly common at major zoos such as the San Diego Zoo. Once again, though, the article in The Edge, with a humorous poke, spoke about a petting zoo being located on the second floor of the library. This zoo was going to be run by Professor O. MacDonald and goats and cattle were going to be present. Also the article discussed the construction of a water slide in the library. Anyone, with any sense of critical thinking abilities, would be able to discern what these articles were about However, if someone wanted to use children in an inflammatory manner in order to be manipulative, then I guess one could come to another conclusion. Perhaps if the author had checked her sources and read theses articles herself she would not have supplied the author with a copy of the articles. Finally, I hope that in the future, the aspiring journalist of the Insight will show enough concern about the truth to check their facts. Steve Hauser Editors note: Steve Hauser is on the staff of The Edge. Dear Editor, I am a concerned first year student here at Fresno State. To be perfectly honest, at first, I considered Fresno State to be a place I could like, but I am not so sure now. I have begun to notice many things that are not right around the campus. Many people see what I see too. What is that? In my opinion, I see CSUF as a biased institute. Fresno State is biased against some departments and students. I myself see this first hand when I attend my Chicano Latin Studies class. My class is held in the San Ramon Building complex. One of the first things I first noticed the first day when I walked Dear Editor, Marlene Bryant's opinion piece of Sept. 21, "Unwed Married Couples Deserve Equal Rights," offered some interesting justification for giving unmarried, cohabiting persons equal benefits and 'rights.' Her point: not to do so is tantamount to discrimination and is a violation of such persons' pursuit of happiness. What she overlooks (perhaps the most important argument against her case) are the consequences of such living arrange- into class was the missing panels on the ceilings of the small room. The holes overhead are unpleasant to look at and unacceptable. Apparently, according to my sister, who has graduated in bilingual teaching, many times the San Ramon classrooms have been evacuated in the past when a terrible burning smell has filled the rooms. This abuse to the professors and students in those buildings truly upsets me! I have paid the inflated registration fees to get nothing in return. How can I be expected to attend a school that apparently neglects his professors and students? If my tuition is not going toward my classes, and obviously it isn't, where is it going? This is not the only class lhat lacks ments when they end: the increasing victimization of children who are the first to suffer and lose their 'rights.' Society has always had a keen interest in protecting the rights of children who were traditionally viewed as 'property.' The benefits given to persons embracing a traditional marriage commitment are designed to protect and promote the well-being of children. Despite the prominence of divorce and separation among traditionally married couples, children still have a better chance of being protected the attention of the administration, but so do my Biology classes. They lack the necessary equipment which is required to successfully and professionally complete such classes. This brings me to my next point. I cannot believe that professors are paid such non-existent rates but are also expected to teach in substandard conditions. What a slap in the face of both students and teachers! Please consider printing my concerns in your next issue. I also ask you to survey your readers and non-readers on this issue. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. Angelica Velazquez Biology major under those circumstances. The issue of abandonment and separation among unmarried, cohabiting couples is even more pronounced and poses a greater risk for children bom (or adopted) into these relationships. This not so much an argument against unmarried, cohabiting couples as it is in favor of persons who make the formal commitment through traditional marriage. Fr. Perry Kavookjian Pastor Newman Center Catholic Church OPINION Some facts in history are surprising. For instance, "In the Olympic Games, Greeks ran races, jumped, hurled the biscuits and threw the java." Uh, ex-squeeze me... baking powder? In a recent column in The Fresno Bee, CSUF professor Elvin Bell entertained readers with excerpts from high school final exams. Thus illustrating that, no matter how much teachers teach, students have selective learning abilities. This is true in history more than any other topic. Some students spend years sitting in cramped classrooms, with an unused pencil poised over a fresh seat of paper, with one eye on the clock and one eye on the professor. Thoughts of "Who cares who won the French-Singaporean War?" and "When is lunch?" pass through their feeble minds. I've taken more than a few classes in history. In fact, if I ever graduate, I '11 graduate with a minor in history. It makes me want to cry myself to sleep at night knowing that students can massacre any historical topic by believing things like "Sir Francis Drake circumcised the world with a 100-foot clipper." Had he really done that, I think Ju daism wouldn't have spread so quickly in the "New World." And, had that student actually cracked open that mysterious thing called a history book, their essay wouldn't have found its way into a column in The Bee. Okay, maybe history isn't the only topic that students ignore. English, unfortunately, is also less than a priority for some. Hence, "In one of Shakespeare's famous plays, Hamlet rations out his situation by relieving himself in a long soliloquy. In another. Lady Mac Beth tries to convince Hamlet to kill the king by attacking his manhood." My high school English teacher graded on a curve. Where was the author of that essay when I needed . him? Some students try to hide the fact that they never study and call for a little divine intervention by using things they learn in Sunday School. These students figure that if they talk about God, their teachers will forgive them for their ignorance. "Afterwards, Moses went up on Mount Cyanide to get the Ten Commandments. David was a Hebrew king skilled at playing the liar. He fought with the Philatelists, a race of people who lived in Biblical times." If I wrote that one, I wouldn't hold my breath for a miracle. Speaking of miracle, I consider it absolutely mind-boggling that the same type of students that wrote these horrific essays ever graduate and make it to college. But I know they're here. These are the students who, in their fifth year as a freshman, walk by the library and wonder what it looks like on the inside. "Must have lots of books and stuff," they think. Rather than check it out, they cruise down to Carl's Jr. for a burger, and pay with their huge financial aid checks that come out of the tax-payers pockets. These are also the students that benefit from the signs in the computer lab lhat point out where the power buttons are. Po-wer... follow the arrows. Idealistically, there's a cool thing called academic probation that should weed out the weaker students. A sort of discrimination for the criminally ignorant. I can understand having a bad semester, but for most people there is no excuse. Just the standard, run-of-the mill product when two stupid people have children. No more, no less. If people had to score a set score on an I.Q. test before they could have children, that would probably prevent overpopulation and the rest of us would have an infinite supply of oxygen. We'd all be better off. TOP TEN MOST COMMON MYTHS ABOUT HISTORY 10. King Henry Vm was a heterosexual. 9. Richard Nixon really didn'tknow anything about the break-in. 8. The Knights of the Round Table delivered pizzas by carriage. 7. Lt. Col. Oliver North was only following orders. 6. Christians love lions. 5. Hitler was a philanthropist. 4. Ronald Reagan could think for himself. 3. Columbus was exploring the South Pacific for the good of mankind. 2. Custer's last stand wasn't. 1. The Devil made Saddam do it Students strike out of funds Terese Farmen OPINION Three strikes,'and students may be out of a college education — not because students are suddenly becoming felons in mass quantities but because state funding will be allocated to afford the prison systems rather than to the universities, because of the three strikes law. How many students will be turned away from a higher education because California can no longer afford its crime rate with its established legislation? In an analysis written by the California Higher Educational Policy Center, released last Thursday, the costs of the prison system will rise from $2 billion to $3.5 billion within the next eight years. The reason: because of the implementation of the three strikes law. Salaries and egos take over pro sports felons will be required to serve longer sentences, thus using a substantial amount of state funds, countering the original goal of the law which was to keep repeat offenders off the streets. Unfortunately, many people did not consider the implications of such a goal. At the universities, to combat the lack of funds, enrollment will have to be restricted, tuition and fees will continue to escalate and taxes will also increase. What happens to those who are turned away from obtaining a higher education? They will become homeless, jobless and uneducated. Who's to say that crime won't triple in due time, because people will be forced to resort to other measures (illegal at times) in order to provide for their families? Three strikes is suffering an awful backlash. If only the government could keep the criminals at bay, California would shine above the rest. But, when half the population is paying taxes to support the other half of ihe population, then who's the winner and who's left holding the rotten potatoes? People have basically three options. The first option is to pay more taxes and higher fees in order to obtain and substantiate the three strikes law. Or, the voters could vote for a representative who favors the modification of the law. Finally, they could straighten up their acts by not parading around toking the crank, tapping the veins, looking for an excuse to start a Mississippi boy on fire, or shooting the neighborhood children in a drive- by shooting and pushing the drugs to Jane and Johnnie Kindergarten. And if so, than maybe, just maybe, every one could have an equal opportunity to achieve intellect and a chance to obtain freedom. This b America, isn't it? OPINION It's October, sports fans. Traditionally, the time of year signaling the close of one sport, baseball, and the beginning of two more, hockey and basketball. But this year, fans are in danger of experiencing the bleakest October in ninety years. In 1904, John McGraw refused to let his New York Giants play Boston in the World Series. McGraw reasoned that the Giants had won the pennant in the National League and had no reason to play the inferior AL champions. In 1994, it's the players who have declined to play. The reason given this year is the lack of a satisfactory collective bargaining agreement. With the remainder of the baseball season already lost, this October is already tarnished. But fans have adjusted and are prepared to follow othersports. Now, though, lt looks as if those same fans are in danger of losing hockey and possibly basketball later, if the owners decide to lock the players out The National Hockey League was scheduled to begin Oct 1. However, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman announced the opening of the season would be post poned for two weeks in order to work out a new collective bargaining agreement with the player's union. Bettman said he refused to let the season start without a contract, because he feared a players' strike sometime during the year. When the players assured the league they would not strike this year, Bettman refused their offer saying that it would only delay the inevitable. In each case, players are declining to sign an agreement with the owners, because they include terms such as salary caps and no arbitration. Players say the terms limit their earning potential and restrict their options to play wherever they choose. Owners say salaries have gotten out of control and must be restricted or else smaller markets will lose teams to low revenue. They're right. ... athletes get paid a tremendous amount of money to play a sport which most people play for free. Irronically, NHL players and owners are at odds over the same problems that ended the baseball season: small market teams losing money, salary caps, salary arbitration and tax Completing the trio, NBA owners are threatening a lockout of the players if a collective bargaining agreement cannot be reached. The NB A's agreement ended last June and talks have begun. But if history tells us anything, those talks will push players and owners further apart rather than closer to an agreement. New agreements, which include revenue sharing and salary caps are an attempt at helping small market teams survive while remaining in that small market The players argue they should not be forced to take apay cut because a team cannot survive in a given city. Some players suggest that struggling teams should move to other cities. Great solution guys. Apparently mete players can't remember back to the days when they loved their home team and would have mourned the loss forever. Re member the Brooklyn Dodgers, the New York Giants and the Washington Senators (twice)? The players claim they are being taken advantage of. They claim it is just another case of owners forcing labor to accept the terms offered. But let's keep some perspective. The average salary in baseball is over $1 million, the minimum is $109,000. The average NHL salary in 1993- 94 was $560,000; the minimum was $100,000. Basketball salaries have followed suit with the signings of players such as Larry Johnson for $84 million, AnferneeHardaway for $66 million and, most recently, a rookie. Grant Hill signed for $44 million. Labor, in this case, is not a group of coal miners or migrant farm workers attempting to reach a fair agreement and trying to earn a living. Even at the league minimum, atheletes get paid a tremendous amount of money to play a sport which most people play for free. The owners are not without fault Mistakes have been made, and they have cost each sport respectively. But at some point salaries and egos must return to Earth. The players must do their part Signing a collective bargaining agreement and returning to what they do best is a start. INSIGHT [CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO Department of. Mass Communication and Journalism CSUF, 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., Fresno, CA 93740-0010 News: 278-2892 Advertising: 278-3934 Lisa L. Alvey Belinda Lee David Mlrhadl Christine Malamanig NlkArif R. Sldek Shelly Silva Celeste Cox Maria Machuca Jason Glbbs Matt Soby Lupe Fuentes Mark Lawrence Yl Ping Ho Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor News Editor Copy Editor Graphic Design Editor Arts &• Entertainment Editor Editorial Page Editor Production Manager Sports Editor Photo Editor Advertising Account Manage Advertising Production Mgr. Circulation Manager PRODUCTION ASSISTANTS Shahada Abdul-Karim Kori Rianda Joe Rosato Jr. John Shaw ii\-imtiiHiiini11 ' Vi'it ■ikahtiii-rfri' |