002_Insight Oct 04 1995 p 2 |
Previous | 2 of 28 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Viewpoint OCTOBER 4,1995 I OPINION 1 Should drugs be legalized? by F.Y.A. Bozem Staff Writer Recent marijuana seizures in thc San Joaquin Valley have reopened a long- debated issue: Should marijuana be legalized? This issue needs to be taken one step further: Should all drugs be legalized? Absolutely yes. Thc government has no right to dictate ethics to citizens. Neither should it spend millions of dollars on a drug war il has no chance of winning. Thc money spent on slowing drug traffic could be spent more effectively on drug rehabilitation programs and education programs instructing people on the dangers of drug use. Thc United States was founded by people fleeing religious persecution. "Religion" is defined in Webster's New World Dictionary as "a specific system of belief, worship, etc., often involving a code of ethics." Therefore religion includes ethics. Thc First Amendmenl guarantees freedom of religion, which implies freedom of ethics. For lhc U.S. government to dictate ethics to its citizens is the same as lhe British Crown forbidding Puritans from conducting their own form of religious worship. Organized crime U.S. citizens should have the right lo decide whether using recreational drugs is ethically right or wrong. Government should only step that others are not injured or affected by people's use of drugs. Stricter punishments are needed for those who work, drive or operate machinery while under Ihe influence of drugs. Children must also be safe-guarded against parents and other care-providers who are unable to properly care for them due to drug or alcohol use. In the 1920s, the federal government tried to enforce the idea thai alcohol was morally wrong, and Prohibition was thc result. It did not work, and alcohol smuggling provided a breeding ground for organized crime. Thc same is true today. Drug traffickers arc often lied to organized crime. Money from drug sales sponsors other criminal activities. My viewpoint is noi thai of a rebellious college student. I am a 32-year- old military veteran. I spent six years as a Coast Guard law enforcement officer fighting the drug wars in the Florida Straits and lhc Caribbean. I have seen for myself the financial and technological power of the drug lords and know lhat the comparatively meager resources of thc U.S. government are no match. For every five tons of marijuana my crew confiscated. 95 tons made it into Miami. Consumer product Too many law enforcement officers have been killed or wounded fighting a drug war that cannot be won. If drugs were legalized, those officers could turn iheir attention to other areas of crime. Statistics show 70 percent of thefts are committed by addicts desperate for money lo support their habits. If drugs were legalized, their prices would drop. Drugs would become another consumer product and consumer competition would begin, much like the competition exhibited by the alcohol and tobacco industries. Once drugs are legalized, the FDA could insure purity of drugs. The federal govemmenl could also tax drugs, providing more revenue. If drugs were" legalized and their prices lowered, criminals would have to find a more lucrative trade. Gangs, which thrive on the sale of illegal drugs, would be left without a The legalization of recreational drugs would reduce crime, provide ihc federal government with more revenue and, most importantly, preserve every citizen's right to freedom of ethics and freedom of choice. EDITORIAL Emphasis on nutrition can be stressful by Robbie Miner Executive Editor During the last decade, health ami fitness in the United Slates has oui lated to an all-time high standard Direct efforts by the media and lhc schools and indirect peer pressure from just about everyone have all contributed to this country obsession vv ith looking good No longer is America the land of,ihe lazy. America should be proud: what we've achieved as a nation in nutrition and fitness has been staggering. And after all. the belter y look the belter you feel, ngl "Noi if -you've lived in ( 1990s. Sure, a healthier body latcs to a better-feeling person — physically. Bul menially, that's a different story. Models have it all: the looks, the men or women, the money. Does all that correlate to happiness, though? For years I hi struggled with the relentless quest of "looking good." I've tried every technique imaginable, and I've spent almost as many hours analyzing my figure as actually doing anything constructive to improve il. Currently. I am a toothpick: I used to at least be a branch. I. like everv one else, would love to become a tree slump, but I know that's not realistic. Still. I strive to look the best I possibly can. Who doesn't? Nutrition talk The sad part is lhat I've had so much nutrition talk shoved down my throat thai I can't put it out of my mind. While I'll probably-lcef bad about my appearance and go to The Pil tor a big grease burger after typing this column. I will probably feel depressed aboul it. t been brainwashed by health doctors anil ihe Surgeon General. Wc are so afraid that anything wc do. anything we eat. is detrimental, lhai we put too much emphasis on nu- (rilion and fitness. 1 have a philosophy. "If you don't think aboul il. it won't kill you." I. lor lhc most part.*believe thai. Another pari of me refuses to listen lo such wisdom. It's that part of nielli.it corrupts me. I used lo have a friend who had an obesity problem. Hc didn't give a damn about what hc ate. how much he worked out, or what anyone thought of him. Consequently, he was very happy, and yes. very popular. Another friend of mine is skinny to the point of near transparency. He looks horrible, but he too is one of the happiest people I know. He told me once what hc said to people who called him skinny. "I say thank you." he said, "not because I know they envy my appearance, but because they envy my situation." High metabolism Who doesn't wish they could cal everything in sight and not put on a pound? Everyone bul those people who actually suffer from a high metabolism rate. I can justify ml My two friends, who have endured so much flack throughout *- their lives, are inspirations to mc. They live for themselves; they do what makes them happy — and for thai I admire them greatly. There was a time in American history when people judged others more by who they really are than what Ihey look like. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem like an idea that will reappear in our society. Peer pressure is too great. Health reports are too superfluous. Hopefully, some new reports will surface, alerting people of a new danger: stress and unhappiness created by the overemphasis of maintaining health and nutrition. In an attempt not to sound corny, I dream of a day when I can sit down with my friends for dinner and scarf down everything in sight without feeling guilty. Health is important, but so is happiness. To have the besi of both worlds — that is the sign of true success. Limbaugh's cures cause more aches by Reg Wagner Contributing Writer To an advertising media buyer who wants to sell a product to an established, impressionable audience. Rush Limbaugh's TV and radio programs are like gold. The self-proclaimed "Dittoheads'' who tune in to Limbaugh's shows aren't just looking for entertainment. They're seeking validation for simplistic political beliefs and trying to exonerate themselves from any son of responsibility, however indirect, for society's problems. To non-Dittoheads, Limbaugh's programs are predictable and ridiculous to the point of being just plain dumb. He giggles and chortles like an overgrown adolescent, making fun of peoples' names and physical appearances. In true pre-pubescent name-calling style, he consistently cites the "socialist slash communist liberal Democrats." the "environmentalist wackos," and the "feminazis" as the supposed cause of America's problems. Like the classic demagogue, who gains power by arousing the passions and prejudices of the masses. Limbaugh has convinced the lower- and middle-class Dittoheads that he and his conservative cohorts, and not the liberals, are their true friends. He uses a frightening technique of illusion, distortion of the facts, and plain, straight lying — otherwise known as propaganda. For example. Dittoheads will never hear thai the upper-class wants to raise taxes on the lower- and" middle- classes in order to provide themselves with minimal taxes and financial support from the government in the form of vast subsidies. Instead, the Limbaugh spin is that lower taxes are better for the economy, as "proven" by the fact that President Clinton, when confronted by a heckler in a crowd, won't name one country that has ever taxed itself into prosperity. Limbaugh also legitimizes laziness. People susceptible to becoming Dittoheads don't want to recycle, since it's a pain to separate the glass from the plastic and ta'kc the newspapers to the recycle bin. Limbaugh gives them the perfect excuse: Environmental awareness is an unnecessary, "politically correct" sham perpetuated by the liberal Democrats and environmentalist wackos. After all. says Limbaugh. there are more acres of forest land in America now than there were in Columbus' time — a "fact" that can be easily refuted. Limbaugh always fails to mention that large corporations are the happiest benefactors of the conservatives' anti- environment agenda, since they save money ever)- time pro- environmental legislation fails to pass. One can hardly blame the Dittoheads for seeking a solution to the world's problems. After all, everyone wants to create a better world for themselves and their descendants. The problem is that America's upper-class, who often pull the strings of the lower- and middle-class without much regard for their well-being and quality of life, also want a better world — but only for themselves and their friends and family, and they're perfectly willing to sacrifice people and the planet for an extra million. Unfortunately, Limbaugh's "solutions" are anything but cures for society's ills. It would be nice if poverty could be reduced by lowering taxes, gang violence could be staunched by dispensing concealed weapons permits, and teenage pregnancy could be eliminated by instituting school prayer, but such "solutions" aren't feasible. Though conservative candidates campaign on these types of planks, the conservative social agenda seems to fall through the cracks once the candidates are actually elected into office. Dittoheads fail to realize that, like a typical demagogue, Limbaugh really couldn't care less about the well-being of the peonage. He isn't devoting his life to spreading the good word of a better way of living. Rather, he's trying to make money and gain power — and he's doing a very good job, despite the harm he's causing to American politics. Observe that he refrained from jumping on Gov. Pete Wilson's anti- affirmative action bandwagon, probably at the request of the other Republican presidential candidates. Dittoheads, please remember that Limbaugh isn't in it for you. He's in it for him. Insight CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO INSIGHT ADVERTISING LINE: 278-3934 Executive Editor Managing Editor Chief Copy Editor News Editor Photo Editor Lifestyle Editor Sports Editor Production Manager Circulation Manager Robbie Miner Sheryl Logue Lorena Campbell EY.A, Bozem Dan Helmbold Denise Dawson Brent Liescheidt Deborah Smith Jeff Bonesteel Ad Accounts Manager Chelsi Jassaud Ad Production Manager Stephanie Stephens Advertising Representatives: Students of MCJ 143 Production Consultant Jefferson Beavers Adviser George Flynn Production /issisftffifs: Alishn Porn.igi.in, Michael Young Stuff Photographers: Vpolinnr Fonseca, David Johnson, Paul Martinez, Toyimy Monreal Staff Reporters: Matt Croce, Jennifer L. Davis, Brian Fisher, Stefanie Hard, Matft.loyd, Christina Penir, Deborah Sanchez, Diane Scalice, Guy Sharvvtxxl, John Shaw, Troy Wagner, May Xaykaothao, Students of MCJ 102W HOW TO REACH US AT INSIGHT: yy MAIL IT E-MAIL IT FAXIT VOICE IT Managing Editor On Campus:* Managing Editor, Insight Call 278-2892 Insight Typalnilght" Man Comm. & Journalism anytime 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., (no quote marks) FAX (209) 278-4995 o,CA 937400010 Insight Volet Mall SEE "INSIGHT ONLINE" ON THE WORLD WIDE WEBI http://info45ub.csufresno.edu/lnsight
Object Description
Title | 1995_10 Insight October 1995 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Dept. of Journalism, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1995 |
Description | Weekly during the school year. Vol. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 8 1969-v. 29, no. 23 (May 13, 1998, issue. Title from masthead. Merged with Daily collegian. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodials |
Contributors | California State University, Fresno Dept. of Journalism |
Coverage | October 8, 1969 - May 13, 1998 |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi, TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | 002_Insight Oct 04 1995 p 2 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publication Date | 1995 |
Full-Text-Search | Viewpoint OCTOBER 4,1995 I OPINION 1 Should drugs be legalized? by F.Y.A. Bozem Staff Writer Recent marijuana seizures in thc San Joaquin Valley have reopened a long- debated issue: Should marijuana be legalized? This issue needs to be taken one step further: Should all drugs be legalized? Absolutely yes. Thc government has no right to dictate ethics to citizens. Neither should it spend millions of dollars on a drug war il has no chance of winning. Thc money spent on slowing drug traffic could be spent more effectively on drug rehabilitation programs and education programs instructing people on the dangers of drug use. Thc United States was founded by people fleeing religious persecution. "Religion" is defined in Webster's New World Dictionary as "a specific system of belief, worship, etc., often involving a code of ethics." Therefore religion includes ethics. Thc First Amendmenl guarantees freedom of religion, which implies freedom of ethics. For lhc U.S. government to dictate ethics to its citizens is the same as lhe British Crown forbidding Puritans from conducting their own form of religious worship. Organized crime U.S. citizens should have the right lo decide whether using recreational drugs is ethically right or wrong. Government should only step that others are not injured or affected by people's use of drugs. Stricter punishments are needed for those who work, drive or operate machinery while under Ihe influence of drugs. Children must also be safe-guarded against parents and other care-providers who are unable to properly care for them due to drug or alcohol use. In the 1920s, the federal government tried to enforce the idea thai alcohol was morally wrong, and Prohibition was thc result. It did not work, and alcohol smuggling provided a breeding ground for organized crime. Thc same is true today. Drug traffickers arc often lied to organized crime. Money from drug sales sponsors other criminal activities. My viewpoint is noi thai of a rebellious college student. I am a 32-year- old military veteran. I spent six years as a Coast Guard law enforcement officer fighting the drug wars in the Florida Straits and lhc Caribbean. I have seen for myself the financial and technological power of the drug lords and know lhat the comparatively meager resources of thc U.S. government are no match. For every five tons of marijuana my crew confiscated. 95 tons made it into Miami. Consumer product Too many law enforcement officers have been killed or wounded fighting a drug war that cannot be won. If drugs were legalized, those officers could turn iheir attention to other areas of crime. Statistics show 70 percent of thefts are committed by addicts desperate for money lo support their habits. If drugs were legalized, their prices would drop. Drugs would become another consumer product and consumer competition would begin, much like the competition exhibited by the alcohol and tobacco industries. Once drugs are legalized, the FDA could insure purity of drugs. The federal govemmenl could also tax drugs, providing more revenue. If drugs were" legalized and their prices lowered, criminals would have to find a more lucrative trade. Gangs, which thrive on the sale of illegal drugs, would be left without a The legalization of recreational drugs would reduce crime, provide ihc federal government with more revenue and, most importantly, preserve every citizen's right to freedom of ethics and freedom of choice. EDITORIAL Emphasis on nutrition can be stressful by Robbie Miner Executive Editor During the last decade, health ami fitness in the United Slates has oui lated to an all-time high standard Direct efforts by the media and lhc schools and indirect peer pressure from just about everyone have all contributed to this country obsession vv ith looking good No longer is America the land of,ihe lazy. America should be proud: what we've achieved as a nation in nutrition and fitness has been staggering. And after all. the belter y look the belter you feel, ngl "Noi if -you've lived in ( 1990s. Sure, a healthier body latcs to a better-feeling person — physically. Bul menially, that's a different story. Models have it all: the looks, the men or women, the money. Does all that correlate to happiness, though? For years I hi struggled with the relentless quest of "looking good." I've tried every technique imaginable, and I've spent almost as many hours analyzing my figure as actually doing anything constructive to improve il. Currently. I am a toothpick: I used to at least be a branch. I. like everv one else, would love to become a tree slump, but I know that's not realistic. Still. I strive to look the best I possibly can. Who doesn't? Nutrition talk The sad part is lhat I've had so much nutrition talk shoved down my throat thai I can't put it out of my mind. While I'll probably-lcef bad about my appearance and go to The Pil tor a big grease burger after typing this column. I will probably feel depressed aboul it. t been brainwashed by health doctors anil ihe Surgeon General. Wc are so afraid that anything wc do. anything we eat. is detrimental, lhai we put too much emphasis on nu- (rilion and fitness. 1 have a philosophy. "If you don't think aboul il. it won't kill you." I. lor lhc most part.*believe thai. Another pari of me refuses to listen lo such wisdom. It's that part of nielli.it corrupts me. I used lo have a friend who had an obesity problem. Hc didn't give a damn about what hc ate. how much he worked out, or what anyone thought of him. Consequently, he was very happy, and yes. very popular. Another friend of mine is skinny to the point of near transparency. He looks horrible, but he too is one of the happiest people I know. He told me once what hc said to people who called him skinny. "I say thank you." he said, "not because I know they envy my appearance, but because they envy my situation." High metabolism Who doesn't wish they could cal everything in sight and not put on a pound? Everyone bul those people who actually suffer from a high metabolism rate. I can justify ml My two friends, who have endured so much flack throughout *- their lives, are inspirations to mc. They live for themselves; they do what makes them happy — and for thai I admire them greatly. There was a time in American history when people judged others more by who they really are than what Ihey look like. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem like an idea that will reappear in our society. Peer pressure is too great. Health reports are too superfluous. Hopefully, some new reports will surface, alerting people of a new danger: stress and unhappiness created by the overemphasis of maintaining health and nutrition. In an attempt not to sound corny, I dream of a day when I can sit down with my friends for dinner and scarf down everything in sight without feeling guilty. Health is important, but so is happiness. To have the besi of both worlds — that is the sign of true success. Limbaugh's cures cause more aches by Reg Wagner Contributing Writer To an advertising media buyer who wants to sell a product to an established, impressionable audience. Rush Limbaugh's TV and radio programs are like gold. The self-proclaimed "Dittoheads'' who tune in to Limbaugh's shows aren't just looking for entertainment. They're seeking validation for simplistic political beliefs and trying to exonerate themselves from any son of responsibility, however indirect, for society's problems. To non-Dittoheads, Limbaugh's programs are predictable and ridiculous to the point of being just plain dumb. He giggles and chortles like an overgrown adolescent, making fun of peoples' names and physical appearances. In true pre-pubescent name-calling style, he consistently cites the "socialist slash communist liberal Democrats." the "environmentalist wackos," and the "feminazis" as the supposed cause of America's problems. Like the classic demagogue, who gains power by arousing the passions and prejudices of the masses. Limbaugh has convinced the lower- and middle-class Dittoheads that he and his conservative cohorts, and not the liberals, are their true friends. He uses a frightening technique of illusion, distortion of the facts, and plain, straight lying — otherwise known as propaganda. For example. Dittoheads will never hear thai the upper-class wants to raise taxes on the lower- and" middle- classes in order to provide themselves with minimal taxes and financial support from the government in the form of vast subsidies. Instead, the Limbaugh spin is that lower taxes are better for the economy, as "proven" by the fact that President Clinton, when confronted by a heckler in a crowd, won't name one country that has ever taxed itself into prosperity. Limbaugh also legitimizes laziness. People susceptible to becoming Dittoheads don't want to recycle, since it's a pain to separate the glass from the plastic and ta'kc the newspapers to the recycle bin. Limbaugh gives them the perfect excuse: Environmental awareness is an unnecessary, "politically correct" sham perpetuated by the liberal Democrats and environmentalist wackos. After all. says Limbaugh. there are more acres of forest land in America now than there were in Columbus' time — a "fact" that can be easily refuted. Limbaugh always fails to mention that large corporations are the happiest benefactors of the conservatives' anti- environment agenda, since they save money ever)- time pro- environmental legislation fails to pass. One can hardly blame the Dittoheads for seeking a solution to the world's problems. After all, everyone wants to create a better world for themselves and their descendants. The problem is that America's upper-class, who often pull the strings of the lower- and middle-class without much regard for their well-being and quality of life, also want a better world — but only for themselves and their friends and family, and they're perfectly willing to sacrifice people and the planet for an extra million. Unfortunately, Limbaugh's "solutions" are anything but cures for society's ills. It would be nice if poverty could be reduced by lowering taxes, gang violence could be staunched by dispensing concealed weapons permits, and teenage pregnancy could be eliminated by instituting school prayer, but such "solutions" aren't feasible. Though conservative candidates campaign on these types of planks, the conservative social agenda seems to fall through the cracks once the candidates are actually elected into office. Dittoheads fail to realize that, like a typical demagogue, Limbaugh really couldn't care less about the well-being of the peonage. He isn't devoting his life to spreading the good word of a better way of living. Rather, he's trying to make money and gain power — and he's doing a very good job, despite the harm he's causing to American politics. Observe that he refrained from jumping on Gov. Pete Wilson's anti- affirmative action bandwagon, probably at the request of the other Republican presidential candidates. Dittoheads, please remember that Limbaugh isn't in it for you. He's in it for him. Insight CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO INSIGHT ADVERTISING LINE: 278-3934 Executive Editor Managing Editor Chief Copy Editor News Editor Photo Editor Lifestyle Editor Sports Editor Production Manager Circulation Manager Robbie Miner Sheryl Logue Lorena Campbell EY.A, Bozem Dan Helmbold Denise Dawson Brent Liescheidt Deborah Smith Jeff Bonesteel Ad Accounts Manager Chelsi Jassaud Ad Production Manager Stephanie Stephens Advertising Representatives: Students of MCJ 143 Production Consultant Jefferson Beavers Adviser George Flynn Production /issisftffifs: Alishn Porn.igi.in, Michael Young Stuff Photographers: Vpolinnr Fonseca, David Johnson, Paul Martinez, Toyimy Monreal Staff Reporters: Matt Croce, Jennifer L. Davis, Brian Fisher, Stefanie Hard, Matft.loyd, Christina Penir, Deborah Sanchez, Diane Scalice, Guy Sharvvtxxl, John Shaw, Troy Wagner, May Xaykaothao, Students of MCJ 102W HOW TO REACH US AT INSIGHT: yy MAIL IT E-MAIL IT FAXIT VOICE IT Managing Editor On Campus:* Managing Editor, Insight Call 278-2892 Insight Typalnilght" Man Comm. & Journalism anytime 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., (no quote marks) FAX (209) 278-4995 o,CA 937400010 Insight Volet Mall SEE "INSIGHT ONLINE" ON THE WORLD WIDE WEBI http://info45ub.csufresno.edu/lnsight |