Insight Sep 29 1993 p 2 |
Previous | 16 of 22 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Page 2 Insight/California State University, Fresno September 29,1993 Letter to the Editor W Dear Editor. Since no one bothered lo ask my side of the story "Donnelly takes over the Driver's seat," I will report "my side" for you. Running an article that provides no quotes from one of the main subjcctsof that article shows a true bias, and a lack of supervision in die campus' "faculty- supervised newspaper." Contrary to popular rumors, I was not fired. I resigned. When I was officially named editor in chief of the Daily Collegian in April, I asked the other editors, with the exception of David Mirhadi. to work for the newspaper. They all happily accepted and put in their applications as a formality. We kept in touch, making plans all sum- I was told then and almost daily thereafter to fire Donnelly, by both fellow studcnLs and some of my superiors. But I kept him, as I had told myself that he was a good sports writer. I wanted to give him the chance to prove he could be the sports editor. Believe me, many times the opportunity presented itself for me to fire him, but I continued to have faith in him. His firing would have been justified! Mirhadi applied as a staff writer. and I asked him to be the news editor. I wanted to help him get started. He had expressed ihe desire to someday be in a higher position. C-corgcCtoastrmtinopoulos was criticized for doing no work. He did the job I assigned him. Many nights when all the outer staff (except my sister, Nanncuc) had left, George returned to help finish-up, working until early morning. He was to be paid only for the job he did. The only things I took from the Daily Collegian were my own personal belongings. Several items still being needed at the Daily Collegian were purchased out of my pocket Our budget was very tight and we had tomakecuts. All my staff members were told of the cuts, and had agreed to stay regardless. Some said that arguments amongst the staff prevented the newspaper from being printed on Wednesday. Sept 15. A computer printer failure was the cause of the paper not being printed. A sign to that effect was posted for our readers. It was after hours for professional help, and no one on staff was able to remedy the problem. The decision to not print that night was clearly the best choice. I notified each editor of the decision to not print before I left the office that night The nextdaytheproblem was solved, and the paper was made into a 12 page issue,ins tcadof the regularcight pages. There were several people I chose not to hire as part of m y staff for various reasons. I, as editor in chief, had the Opinion right to hire and fire at my discretion. I enforced rules which made at least one person unhappy, by not allowing long -distance non -Collegian telephone calls from the Collegian phones, and using the Daily Collegian name for personal mail. I also stopped those who toed to use die Collegian computers, printers and paper for homework and other non-newspaper business. It was difficult to have true leadership when being constantly undermined by a person who wanted to be a leader, yet had to enlist the help of a non staff member to do so. I have no regrets about leaving the Daily Collegian, except for the unkind and untrue remarks [that] have been and continue to be said. Lisa Driver Editor's note - It should be noted that despite several attempts. Driver could not be reached to comment for the article in question. In addition. Insight has no control over popular rumors. The articles first paragraph clearly stated Driver resigned from the position. It made no inference, nor did it intend to make any inference, that she was terminated. The opinions of the sources used in the story do nol necessarily reflect those of the reporter or Insight staff. Finally, it is the policy of MCJ Department faculty not to police Insight stories by dictating how they should be We wish Driver the best of luck in the future. NAFTA's softer sucking sound Davin A. Hutchins As parties on both sides of the incensed debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement mobilize their troops for the showdown in Congress this fall, salient peculiarities are emerging that make the war over NAFTA noticeably different from the recent standoff in Washington. Right off, NAFTA stands apart from Congress' battle over the deficit reduction plan and narrow passage this summer because jt appears to be unfolding as a strictly nonpartisan issue. But anew peculiarity has raised more than a few eyebrows. Rabble-rousers like Perot and Patrick Buchanan are mounting a campaign of psychological warfare to scare an ill-informed American public into expecting an apocal ypse, ensuring NAFTA's resounding defeaL Recent public opinion polls demon- stratc that nearly half of all Americans do not have a the foggiest clue about NAFTA. Clearly.the American people's extreme lack of information on NAFTA makes them all the more vulnerable to propagandist scare tactics. Americans are then rendered impotent to form an intelligent opinion on the issue and duly influence Congress by speaking their own minds. Instead they regurgitate the fean implanted by dema- goguery. So in the interest of greasing the democratic gears by cultivating a more well-informed public, ailcas: in this tiny neck of the woods, let's dispel a few myths: Altruistic critics of NAFTA would have Americans believe that the pact is not in Mexico's best interests. They argue big business would exploit Mexican labor by preserving substandard wages and milk the lenient federal laws in Mexico to dump industrial pollution. Perhaps these same critics can explain why President Carlos Salinas de Gortari will spend more than $28 million lobbying Congress in support of NAFTA by year's end. Perhaps he realizes that NAFTA means long-term prosperity for Mexico by attracting MS. investment and technology. The Harvard-educated economist is probably more qualified to speak on behalf of Mexico's best interests than any American sympathizer. With regard to excessive dumping of industrial waste,Ointon's environmental side agreements to NAFTA which include the three-nation Commission on Environmental Cooperation, may make that cost-cutting measure a bit more difficult to pursue. Even "green" groups like the National Wildlife Federation, the Environmental L>cfcnseFund and the National Audubon Society arc getting behind NAFTA. The Harvard- educated economist is probably more qualified to speak on behalf of Mexico's best interests'than any American sympathizer. Yet one of the most resounding arguments proffered by NAFTA foes like Perot and Buchanan is that the trade pact will result in the immediate loss of millions of American jobs as companies make a run for the border to exploit cheap Mexican labor. Even the rubric of Perot's new book heralds the populist battle cry—Save Your Job, Save Our Country: Why NAFTA Must Be Stopped- Now! Admiral Perot warns that once the proud vessel known as the U.S.S. Job Security hits the NAFTA iceberg, it will sink fast Perot would have Americans falsely believe it is far more advantageous for US. companies to spend millions uprooting their current factories in the United Slates, rebuilding new plants in Mexico, training unskilled Mexican workers and incurring long-term distri bution costs to send goods back to the Stales simply to take advantage of cheap labor costs. Besides nothing is stopping multinational companies from relocating to Mexico today without NAFTA, just like nothing stops Nissan or Toyota from building auto planis in America. If taking advantage of lower labor costs and lax environmental laws is the lure for fleeting American businesses, why haven't ihey left already? The answer: Labor is only one slice of a very big pic. Labor only accounts for 10 to 20 percent of production costs for most American firms today. A company does not sink or float based on inexpensive labor. There are many other ways to rum a profit including reducing tariffs on cx- rx)rmo pry open foreign rrwrkcts. Sound familiar? Furthermore, Mexican laborers, generally speaking, are less educated and less productive than their American counterparts, which may explain some of the wage disparity. Additional training or inefficiency could result in added costs for companies that would not be incurred if they would just stay where they presently are. Which is precisely what U.S. firms are doing. In 1991, U.S. companies only invested $700 million in their Mexican factories compared to $500 billion in factories here at home, proving American executives realize cheap labor is not enough of an incentive to make U.S. firms relocate en masse. The thrust of NAFTA is to tear down the tariff walls currently protecting Mexican firms from U.S. goods, opening up markets for Amer-ican producers and manufacturers. Today, Mexican lariffs on American goods are higher than American tariffs on Mexican goods— roughly 10 percent to our4perccnL Besides, thcUnitcd Stales already has a S5.4 billion trade surplus with Mexico. Tariff-free markets would most likely mean this trade surplus would augment benefiting American businesses and promoting job-growth here at home by the production of more goods for cheaper markets. So much for Perot's "giant sucking sound." Hutchins is an Insight staff writer. Helmets Continued from paga 1 a broken arm and hand. "We all wear helmets now when wc bike ride," Smittcamp said. Though current California law requires only children under four years old or less than 40 pounds to wear a bicycle helmet when riding as a passenger, a current legislative bill might force all children, 18 years and under, to wear a helmet when operating a bicycle or when riding as a passenger. If Gov. Pete Wilson approves the proposed bill by Oct 10, or does not veto it by that date, a mandatory bicycle helmet law will commence Jan. 1.1994. "I'm in favor of the law because of what happened to our family," Smittcamp said. "But I hate the thought of having a mandate. I would hope parents could make an intelligent enough decision to protect their chil- Not only do the Smittcamps now wear helmets when bike riding, but as result of Bradley's head injury, Bradley must wear a helmet whenever he goes outside. A 2 inch by 2 inch 'soft spot' remains on Bradley's head where bone was removed, requiring constant protection from ihe possibility of a second injury. In December his neurosurgeon will re-evaluate hiscondition, deciding which type of surgery is necessary to fill the soft space. After the original surgery the night of the accident Bradley spent four days in coma and three weeks in the hospital. Upon emerging from Ihe coma, he began intensive rehabilitation which continued from March until August Though walking and balance came back fairly quickly to Bradley, talking and fine motor skills were slower to regain. Both speech and occupational therapies were necessary components of Bradley's rehabilitation. After ending speech therapy last month. Bradley now only attends occupational therapy, which will conclude in October. And as a full-time Kindergarten student Bradley is currently at his peers' level, if not above, according to reports his teachers give his Mom. "He is completely mainstrcamed," she said. "The only difference is Bradley wears a helmet now." Another family's story "Technically, he was dead at the site," said Jennifer Pisani of Fresno, recalling her 13-year-old son's accident in Visalia in March. Weaving in and oul of parked cars, sieve Kujimdo INSIGHT At on* of CSU F'a chlldca ro canters, teacher Artie Chavez assists toddler Victoria Lascano, who Is creating her mastorp Iocs of art. traveling against traffic, wearingahead- set but no helmet Nicholas Jones was hit broadside by a car going 40 mph. On his way home to his dad's house, with a group of his seventh-grade friends waiting for him to cross ihe intersection, Nick crossed the front of the car, his head breaking the windshield from the impact and his body skidding across the pavement leaving road bums down to the bone on his hips and shoulders. Kept alive by CPR from a lone jogger who left the scene after the ambulance arrived, Nick was directly transferred to Valley Children's Hospital. Immediately inducing coma to keep his brain from swelling, Nick spent one week in the intensive care unit on a respirator and a total of almost three weeks in a coma before he became alert After regaining consciousness. Nick could not walk or talk. He began intense sessions of physical, occupational and speech therapies, which continued past his 71 -day stay in the hospital. After being released in May, Nick became a day-patient continuing treatments through the middle of August Though Nick now communicates very well, he will have to continue speech therapy in the future, according to his mom. "The doctors said some things may never go away," Pisani said. "Wc just have to be patient" Currently Nick attends special day classes as an eighth-grader at Alia Sierra School and spends his afternoons skating, biking and rclcaming how to play baseball. "Everything has to be re-explained to him," Pisani said. "It's just one day after another of trying new things." One ofthe most recent "new" things in Nick and his family's lives is that they all now wear helmets. Before the accident Nick used to tell his mom it was "uncool" to wear a bicycle helmet and thai it "messed up his hair." But now, when Nick is riding in the car with his mom and sees another biker wearing a helmet, he says, "There's a smart kid." And if ihcy pass a biker without a helmet be comments, "Hope we don't see them at Valley Children's." Pisani said she does not wish what she and her family went through on anyone. "It was terrible and has drastically changed our lives," she said. 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., CSUF, Fresno, CA 93740-0010 Insight News: 278-2892 Advertising: 278-3934 Editor-in-Chief Copy Editor Deborah Miller Managing Editor Inger Sethov News Editor Erin Yasuda Graphics Editor Jennifer Lewis Photo Editor Diane TYoha Sports Editor Tony Altobelli Arts & Entertainment Editor Rebecca Boyd Christina Fonseca Advertising Manager Camilla Cederquist Advertising Production Manager Jennifer Lewis Photographers Steve Fujimoto Karen Toth Tommy Mon real Assistant Copy Editors M. Cristina Medina Olivia Reyes Staff Writers Students of MCJ 103 & 102W INSIGHT welcomes all letters, comments and corrections'. INSIGHT reserves the right to condense letters to the editor for any reason. Anonymous letters to the editor will not be considered. Please include your phone and ID number for our identification purposes. Unsigned editorials are the majority opinion of the editorial board and do not necessarily represent die Department of Mass Communications and Journalism. CSUF administration or the trustees ofthe CSU system. 3DEH9I 1 ADVERTISING | Happy 19th Birthday Laura Love, Lisa, Lcticia, 'Maria, Orfichelfe & Laurie w ■ MJH'M 2 & 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSES •POOL t^RI/» •FIREPLACES •SPA 0>nr^vO 'GARAGES •BASKETBALL fy/fi.tyz2&}fa& 'SECURITY •TENNIS ^^T^S^^/Ci^^^ 'CLUBHOUSE PH: 294-8012 walking distance lo CSO Seasonal Specials 4885 N. Chestnut AMERICA'S CRUISE VACATION STORE sm We Promise Great Cruise Vacations .m 3-Day Mexican Baja Cruise! From $309/person. (selecteddales) Limited Availability mm V, CRUISE HOLIDAYS inPIHQF^m_ 579 ■ N°rih First St., Fresno _JUnUiaC**^ 209 438-7447 ^HOLIDAYSmmmmmmmmY, 800 666-4244
Object Description
Title | 1993_09 Insight September 1993 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Dept. of Journalism, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1993 |
Description | Weekly during the school year. Vol. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 8, 1969)-v. 29, no. 23 (May 13, 1998). Ceased with May 13, 1998, issue. Title from masthead. Merged with Daily collegian. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno Periodicals |
Contributors | California State University, Fresno Dept. of Journalism |
Coverage | October 8, 1969 – May 13, 1998 |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 “E-image data” |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | Insight Sep 29 1993 p 2 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publication Date | 1993 |
Full-Text-Search | Page 2 Insight/California State University, Fresno September 29,1993 Letter to the Editor W Dear Editor. Since no one bothered lo ask my side of the story "Donnelly takes over the Driver's seat," I will report "my side" for you. Running an article that provides no quotes from one of the main subjcctsof that article shows a true bias, and a lack of supervision in die campus' "faculty- supervised newspaper." Contrary to popular rumors, I was not fired. I resigned. When I was officially named editor in chief of the Daily Collegian in April, I asked the other editors, with the exception of David Mirhadi. to work for the newspaper. They all happily accepted and put in their applications as a formality. We kept in touch, making plans all sum- I was told then and almost daily thereafter to fire Donnelly, by both fellow studcnLs and some of my superiors. But I kept him, as I had told myself that he was a good sports writer. I wanted to give him the chance to prove he could be the sports editor. Believe me, many times the opportunity presented itself for me to fire him, but I continued to have faith in him. His firing would have been justified! Mirhadi applied as a staff writer. and I asked him to be the news editor. I wanted to help him get started. He had expressed ihe desire to someday be in a higher position. C-corgcCtoastrmtinopoulos was criticized for doing no work. He did the job I assigned him. Many nights when all the outer staff (except my sister, Nanncuc) had left, George returned to help finish-up, working until early morning. He was to be paid only for the job he did. The only things I took from the Daily Collegian were my own personal belongings. Several items still being needed at the Daily Collegian were purchased out of my pocket Our budget was very tight and we had tomakecuts. All my staff members were told of the cuts, and had agreed to stay regardless. Some said that arguments amongst the staff prevented the newspaper from being printed on Wednesday. Sept 15. A computer printer failure was the cause of the paper not being printed. A sign to that effect was posted for our readers. It was after hours for professional help, and no one on staff was able to remedy the problem. The decision to not print that night was clearly the best choice. I notified each editor of the decision to not print before I left the office that night The nextdaytheproblem was solved, and the paper was made into a 12 page issue,ins tcadof the regularcight pages. There were several people I chose not to hire as part of m y staff for various reasons. I, as editor in chief, had the Opinion right to hire and fire at my discretion. I enforced rules which made at least one person unhappy, by not allowing long -distance non -Collegian telephone calls from the Collegian phones, and using the Daily Collegian name for personal mail. I also stopped those who toed to use die Collegian computers, printers and paper for homework and other non-newspaper business. It was difficult to have true leadership when being constantly undermined by a person who wanted to be a leader, yet had to enlist the help of a non staff member to do so. I have no regrets about leaving the Daily Collegian, except for the unkind and untrue remarks [that] have been and continue to be said. Lisa Driver Editor's note - It should be noted that despite several attempts. Driver could not be reached to comment for the article in question. In addition. Insight has no control over popular rumors. The articles first paragraph clearly stated Driver resigned from the position. It made no inference, nor did it intend to make any inference, that she was terminated. The opinions of the sources used in the story do nol necessarily reflect those of the reporter or Insight staff. Finally, it is the policy of MCJ Department faculty not to police Insight stories by dictating how they should be We wish Driver the best of luck in the future. NAFTA's softer sucking sound Davin A. Hutchins As parties on both sides of the incensed debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement mobilize their troops for the showdown in Congress this fall, salient peculiarities are emerging that make the war over NAFTA noticeably different from the recent standoff in Washington. Right off, NAFTA stands apart from Congress' battle over the deficit reduction plan and narrow passage this summer because jt appears to be unfolding as a strictly nonpartisan issue. But anew peculiarity has raised more than a few eyebrows. Rabble-rousers like Perot and Patrick Buchanan are mounting a campaign of psychological warfare to scare an ill-informed American public into expecting an apocal ypse, ensuring NAFTA's resounding defeaL Recent public opinion polls demon- stratc that nearly half of all Americans do not have a the foggiest clue about NAFTA. Clearly.the American people's extreme lack of information on NAFTA makes them all the more vulnerable to propagandist scare tactics. Americans are then rendered impotent to form an intelligent opinion on the issue and duly influence Congress by speaking their own minds. Instead they regurgitate the fean implanted by dema- goguery. So in the interest of greasing the democratic gears by cultivating a more well-informed public, ailcas: in this tiny neck of the woods, let's dispel a few myths: Altruistic critics of NAFTA would have Americans believe that the pact is not in Mexico's best interests. They argue big business would exploit Mexican labor by preserving substandard wages and milk the lenient federal laws in Mexico to dump industrial pollution. Perhaps these same critics can explain why President Carlos Salinas de Gortari will spend more than $28 million lobbying Congress in support of NAFTA by year's end. Perhaps he realizes that NAFTA means long-term prosperity for Mexico by attracting MS. investment and technology. The Harvard-educated economist is probably more qualified to speak on behalf of Mexico's best interests than any American sympathizer. With regard to excessive dumping of industrial waste,Ointon's environmental side agreements to NAFTA which include the three-nation Commission on Environmental Cooperation, may make that cost-cutting measure a bit more difficult to pursue. Even "green" groups like the National Wildlife Federation, the Environmental L>cfcnseFund and the National Audubon Society arc getting behind NAFTA. The Harvard- educated economist is probably more qualified to speak on behalf of Mexico's best interests'than any American sympathizer. Yet one of the most resounding arguments proffered by NAFTA foes like Perot and Buchanan is that the trade pact will result in the immediate loss of millions of American jobs as companies make a run for the border to exploit cheap Mexican labor. Even the rubric of Perot's new book heralds the populist battle cry—Save Your Job, Save Our Country: Why NAFTA Must Be Stopped- Now! Admiral Perot warns that once the proud vessel known as the U.S.S. Job Security hits the NAFTA iceberg, it will sink fast Perot would have Americans falsely believe it is far more advantageous for US. companies to spend millions uprooting their current factories in the United Slates, rebuilding new plants in Mexico, training unskilled Mexican workers and incurring long-term distri bution costs to send goods back to the Stales simply to take advantage of cheap labor costs. Besides nothing is stopping multinational companies from relocating to Mexico today without NAFTA, just like nothing stops Nissan or Toyota from building auto planis in America. If taking advantage of lower labor costs and lax environmental laws is the lure for fleeting American businesses, why haven't ihey left already? The answer: Labor is only one slice of a very big pic. Labor only accounts for 10 to 20 percent of production costs for most American firms today. A company does not sink or float based on inexpensive labor. There are many other ways to rum a profit including reducing tariffs on cx- rx)rmo pry open foreign rrwrkcts. Sound familiar? Furthermore, Mexican laborers, generally speaking, are less educated and less productive than their American counterparts, which may explain some of the wage disparity. Additional training or inefficiency could result in added costs for companies that would not be incurred if they would just stay where they presently are. Which is precisely what U.S. firms are doing. In 1991, U.S. companies only invested $700 million in their Mexican factories compared to $500 billion in factories here at home, proving American executives realize cheap labor is not enough of an incentive to make U.S. firms relocate en masse. The thrust of NAFTA is to tear down the tariff walls currently protecting Mexican firms from U.S. goods, opening up markets for Amer-ican producers and manufacturers. Today, Mexican lariffs on American goods are higher than American tariffs on Mexican goods— roughly 10 percent to our4perccnL Besides, thcUnitcd Stales already has a S5.4 billion trade surplus with Mexico. Tariff-free markets would most likely mean this trade surplus would augment benefiting American businesses and promoting job-growth here at home by the production of more goods for cheaper markets. So much for Perot's "giant sucking sound." Hutchins is an Insight staff writer. Helmets Continued from paga 1 a broken arm and hand. "We all wear helmets now when wc bike ride," Smittcamp said. Though current California law requires only children under four years old or less than 40 pounds to wear a bicycle helmet when riding as a passenger, a current legislative bill might force all children, 18 years and under, to wear a helmet when operating a bicycle or when riding as a passenger. If Gov. Pete Wilson approves the proposed bill by Oct 10, or does not veto it by that date, a mandatory bicycle helmet law will commence Jan. 1.1994. "I'm in favor of the law because of what happened to our family," Smittcamp said. "But I hate the thought of having a mandate. I would hope parents could make an intelligent enough decision to protect their chil- Not only do the Smittcamps now wear helmets when bike riding, but as result of Bradley's head injury, Bradley must wear a helmet whenever he goes outside. A 2 inch by 2 inch 'soft spot' remains on Bradley's head where bone was removed, requiring constant protection from ihe possibility of a second injury. In December his neurosurgeon will re-evaluate hiscondition, deciding which type of surgery is necessary to fill the soft space. After the original surgery the night of the accident Bradley spent four days in coma and three weeks in the hospital. Upon emerging from Ihe coma, he began intensive rehabilitation which continued from March until August Though walking and balance came back fairly quickly to Bradley, talking and fine motor skills were slower to regain. Both speech and occupational therapies were necessary components of Bradley's rehabilitation. After ending speech therapy last month. Bradley now only attends occupational therapy, which will conclude in October. And as a full-time Kindergarten student Bradley is currently at his peers' level, if not above, according to reports his teachers give his Mom. "He is completely mainstrcamed," she said. "The only difference is Bradley wears a helmet now." Another family's story "Technically, he was dead at the site," said Jennifer Pisani of Fresno, recalling her 13-year-old son's accident in Visalia in March. Weaving in and oul of parked cars, sieve Kujimdo INSIGHT At on* of CSU F'a chlldca ro canters, teacher Artie Chavez assists toddler Victoria Lascano, who Is creating her mastorp Iocs of art. traveling against traffic, wearingahead- set but no helmet Nicholas Jones was hit broadside by a car going 40 mph. On his way home to his dad's house, with a group of his seventh-grade friends waiting for him to cross ihe intersection, Nick crossed the front of the car, his head breaking the windshield from the impact and his body skidding across the pavement leaving road bums down to the bone on his hips and shoulders. Kept alive by CPR from a lone jogger who left the scene after the ambulance arrived, Nick was directly transferred to Valley Children's Hospital. Immediately inducing coma to keep his brain from swelling, Nick spent one week in the intensive care unit on a respirator and a total of almost three weeks in a coma before he became alert After regaining consciousness. Nick could not walk or talk. He began intense sessions of physical, occupational and speech therapies, which continued past his 71 -day stay in the hospital. After being released in May, Nick became a day-patient continuing treatments through the middle of August Though Nick now communicates very well, he will have to continue speech therapy in the future, according to his mom. "The doctors said some things may never go away," Pisani said. "Wc just have to be patient" Currently Nick attends special day classes as an eighth-grader at Alia Sierra School and spends his afternoons skating, biking and rclcaming how to play baseball. "Everything has to be re-explained to him," Pisani said. "It's just one day after another of trying new things." One ofthe most recent "new" things in Nick and his family's lives is that they all now wear helmets. Before the accident Nick used to tell his mom it was "uncool" to wear a bicycle helmet and thai it "messed up his hair." But now, when Nick is riding in the car with his mom and sees another biker wearing a helmet, he says, "There's a smart kid." And if ihcy pass a biker without a helmet be comments, "Hope we don't see them at Valley Children's." Pisani said she does not wish what she and her family went through on anyone. "It was terrible and has drastically changed our lives," she said. 2225 E. San Ramon Ave., CSUF, Fresno, CA 93740-0010 Insight News: 278-2892 Advertising: 278-3934 Editor-in-Chief Copy Editor Deborah Miller Managing Editor Inger Sethov News Editor Erin Yasuda Graphics Editor Jennifer Lewis Photo Editor Diane TYoha Sports Editor Tony Altobelli Arts & Entertainment Editor Rebecca Boyd Christina Fonseca Advertising Manager Camilla Cederquist Advertising Production Manager Jennifer Lewis Photographers Steve Fujimoto Karen Toth Tommy Mon real Assistant Copy Editors M. Cristina Medina Olivia Reyes Staff Writers Students of MCJ 103 & 102W INSIGHT welcomes all letters, comments and corrections'. INSIGHT reserves the right to condense letters to the editor for any reason. Anonymous letters to the editor will not be considered. Please include your phone and ID number for our identification purposes. Unsigned editorials are the majority opinion of the editorial board and do not necessarily represent die Department of Mass Communications and Journalism. CSUF administration or the trustees ofthe CSU system. 3DEH9I 1 ADVERTISING | Happy 19th Birthday Laura Love, Lisa, Lcticia, 'Maria, Orfichelfe & Laurie w ■ MJH'M 2 & 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSES •POOL t^RI/» •FIREPLACES •SPA 0>nr^vO 'GARAGES •BASKETBALL fy/fi.tyz2&}fa& 'SECURITY •TENNIS ^^T^S^^/Ci^^^ 'CLUBHOUSE PH: 294-8012 walking distance lo CSO Seasonal Specials 4885 N. Chestnut AMERICA'S CRUISE VACATION STORE sm We Promise Great Cruise Vacations .m 3-Day Mexican Baja Cruise! From $309/person. (selecteddales) Limited Availability mm V, CRUISE HOLIDAYS inPIHQF^m_ 579 ■ N°rih First St., Fresno _JUnUiaC**^ 209 438-7447 ^HOLIDAYSmmmmmmmmY, 800 666-4244 |