Insight Oct 1 1997 p 2 |
Previous | 2 of 22 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
2 ~:.~ \^ewPoint & News Insight Opinion Take this wake-up call, NASA, before someone dies by Draeger Martinez Plenttof things pose safety and health risks these days. Crime, pollution, diet drugs that weaken heart valves — it's a tough world out there. But it seems that no amount of analysis, studies, estimates, charts or warnings sinks in with many people. Every weekend, some drunk Fresnan tells herself she can drive home just fine. Each lover's night, some guy somewhere thinks he can have unprotected sex "just this once." The only wake-up call that dependably conveys the message, the one that grabs attention to a problem and quick: when somebody dies from Ihe problem. Take a hard-partying high school. Then suppose one popular kid, just one. dies from some risky activity. Within days, the school gets religion about that particular risk, even if they continue ignoring others. And when Princess Diana died last month, many saw the tragedy as an overdue warning about the intrusive, even harassing nature of the "stalkerazzi." Well, there are a couple of disasters waiting to happen that haven't yet. They can be prevented now, before anybody has to drive the point home with their deaths. And our very own ail-American space agency, NASA, can do the job in both cases. One space-borne hazard zone is the Mir space station. I have huge respect for the cosmonauts that have wrung so much use out of Mir, which has been in orbit more than twice its planned design life. But with the station's recent collisions, blackouts and other problems, isn't every extra day the crew spends up there another roll of the dice? Snake eyes has to come around sometime, with fatal results. So save the lives aboard Mir, NASA. Wrap up the experiments, get the cosmic travelers an express taxi home (maybe a space shuttle with yellow-checkered heat tiles) and give those folks a heroic welcome back. While they're still alive to enjoy it. As tragic as the loss of life in a Mir disaster would be. NASA has another launch soon that could yield an even bigger catastrophe. On Oct. 13, the space agency plans to send a big exploratory probe toward Saturn. It's called Cassini, its power plant is fueled by 72 pounds of ultra-toxic plutonium-238. and it will threaten the lives of thousands on Earth, not once but twice. City University of New York physicist Michio Kaku has said NASA has deliberately underestimated the risks with Cassini. He figures that if the probe were to explode during its launch or shortly afterward, the plutonium on board would hit the atmosphere and give 200,000 people cancer that would kill them within a few years. The plutonium-238 isotope is among the most radioactive, and cancer-causing, known to man. While a launch accident would not radioactivity could plague Florida for centuries. And that's merely the first time Cassini poses a risk. Once Cassini is launched, its trajectory includes two big swings around Venus and a pass within 500 miles of Earth. Each swerve is meant to "slingshot" the probe, giving it gravity- boosted acceleration into deep space. If a problem occurs with the Earth flyby, there's no telling who could find themselves needing a 6,000-strcngth sunblock. It could be India, Bosnia, Rwanda — or California. NASA officials say the risks are minuscule and accounted for. They say that Cassini has to rely on plutonium fuel to reach Saturn and study its icy rings, and that (health- friendly) solar energy cells won't pack enough power. But Kaku and other skeptics say solar power would be enough, if NASA would simply leave out one or two of Cassini's 12 instruments. Or for that matter, maybe someone can develop more densely-packed solar cells, like Intel recently did with flash-memory transistors that double their chips' capacity. The point is, why is NASA in such a hurry to send this probe, when it poses even a "minuscule" risk of horrific cancer deaths? There's normore Cold War adversaries looking over our shoulder. Saturn's rings will still be there if better solar cells take five or 10, or 50 or 100, years to develop. The agency says it can't rebuild or redesign the Cassini probe, which cost $3.4 billion. But wouldn't throwing that money away still be a bargain compared to risking all those lives? Draeger Martinez is the Chief ■ Copy Editor for Insight. DEAL: Estimates suggest savings of $258 million ovet five years Continued from page 1 from private industry and sold under CSU auspices. According to comments in the memo, 'the CETI Corp. would apparently own, operate and control the CSU technology infrastructure from the workstations to the mainframes, the cables to the software." Job security within the CSU system is also an issue under the CETI plan. The Business Plan Summary states, "CETI will make every effort to retain full time CSU employees in their current job classifications. In addition, they will allow them to maintain an identity with their parent organization and retain their seniority and full benefits." Savings expected The CETI plan is also predicted to save $147.5 million in the CSU budget from 1997 to 1999. according to the Business Plan Summary. Over a five-year projection, estimated savings will be more than $258 million. Budget savings are expected from "Information —■— Technology Expenditures, Infrastructure Deployment, Student Services and Support Costs," as stated in the summary. CSU spokesman Ken Swisher said the contract could be implemented by the end of this year. "The idea is to get all of our campuses working together," he said. Proposed infrastructure timeline Upgrade to baseline infrastructure for 19981 aU campus libraries, computer labs and faculty offices. 1QQQ* uP6Tade 12 selected campuses and 127277* all campus administrative offices. 2000* ComPIete upgrade of remaining 11 <L.KJ\J\J. campuses, including Fresno State. Source: CETI Team Business Plan Summary Business Plan. The categories are: development of educational content; career and student development; development of telecommunications; and commercial products. The development of educational content category will offer products created by both the CSU campuses "The idea is to get all of our campuses working together." — Ken Swisher, CSU spokesman elude: campus consumers, consisting of students and faculty; university consumers, including alumni and staff; and public i Reduced commitment Under the development of educational content category. Team GTE has proposed 13 different ——— services, eight of which are specifically designed for electronic delivery which "reduces classroom commitment." One such proposed service, called CSU Virtual University, is described in Appendix B as intended to "supplement current programs." Ken Swisher in the Chancellor's Office said the Virtual University would "offer options for students to take classes in classrooms or in dis- UUCICU I' four"revi accordinj and the industries. Career and student development products will be designed to assist stu- Swisher explained the proposed dents and graduates in job searches plan as marketing the CSU students, and career enhancements. faculty and administration, appro*i- The telecommunications category tance classes. mately 375,000 in total, to the Team would "maximize the infrastructure However, philosophy profe GTE companies. As a result, the team developed under CE^l," while the would provide better rates for service commercial products category would and state-of-the-art products. offer "products that leverage and pro mote CSU's established brand recog- Variety of services nition," according to Appendix B, The products and services to be written by GTE. offered by Team GTE are divided into Team GTE has divided the prospec- four "revenue-generating" categories, uve market into three categories, ac- according to Appendix B of theCETI cording to Appendix B-2. These in- Warrcn Kessler disagrees. "Student-faculty interaction is the key to learning," said Kessler, president of the Fresno State chapter of the California Faculty Association. "Computer simulations will not improve [students'] skills. Sitting passively by the television or computer won't do the trick." Appearance-based treatment unfair by Clora Ash Consider this hypothetical situation: "Miss Sunshine" woke up one morning and decided that she wanted to dress pretty. She spent two to three hours getting dressed. Without a doubt, the girl looked good. Everyone thought "Miss Sunshine" looked great and they went out of their way to acknowledge her presence. Men practically ran to open the door for her. The world was hers to command. The sun was shining and the birds were chirping. It was a glorious day. However. "Miss Sunshine" misinterpreted the positive feedback that she received from everyone. She thought that it was her presence alone that caused people to fuss over her — not! She quickly found out that wasn't the case if she came in looking like a plain Jane. In that situation, men decided that she could get her own door, and in some cases, they slammed the door on her. "Miss Sunshine" had learned a valuable lesson about our civilized society, which is: If you want to treated with respect, you have better look nice every day or pay the consequences. Most people have experienced this difference in treatment, which can be physically, mentally and emotionally exhausting. People also know how it feels to be ignored, and yet it is still considered acceptable treatment for people whose appearance falls outside the slatus^quo. How did society get to this point? When did vanity become more important than the heart or the spirit of the human being? What does the outside appearance really reveal about a person? Just because a person looks good, naturally or through cosmetic surgery, that does not represent intelligence, kindness, or accomplishment. Many times it only represents a lot of time looking in the mirror and admiring ourselves. When the person's heart is devalued, but his vanity is valued, it shows that societal morals are headed in the wrong direction. This misplaced value probably contributes to low self-esteem, even unhappiness. Maybe this society can accept that adults go to extremes for acceptance, but what about the effects it can have on teenagers? We have teenagers not only wanting surgery, but they also are willing to go to extremes so that they can be thin. These teens want to look like the models they see on television and in magazines, but this is an unrealistic desire. Some people will argue that it is acceptable to expect people to look a certain way, because it is important to look good for employment and advancements in life. This argument should not be acceptable, because there is something called "free time." When people are relaxing during free lime, they should not be expected to dress up. before they leave their homes. Only a shower and deodorant should be required. This is a free country, and that means that the people who live here should be able to dress as they please, without consequences. People should not be defined or limited because of their appearance. There is still a chance to create a mellow environment, and a peaceful planet, which can be achieved through challenging daily our insensitive attitudes and actions. Everyone has the ability to make a difference, no matter how small their contribution is. It is important to look beyond people's outer appearance and look a little deeper for what they have inside their heart. Each human being should work hard to judge each other less, and love each other more. Clora Ash is an Insight staff writer. RENOVATIONS: Facelifts for campus will take 5-10 years Continued from page 1 and classes arc littered with old equipment and chalk dust. "We are facing the multi-million dollar deterioration of an educational institution." said Warren Kessler, president of the Fresno State chapter of the California Faculty Association, the union for professors. "How can we ask students to take us seriously when we're ushering them into rooms that look like Russia in the 1930s?" he asked. Many disagree with the philosophy professor's extreme position, but few would argue that the Fresno State campus needs help. "From an aesthetic point, [Kcssler's] estimation is very accurate," Boyd said. "The classrooms are old, they're worn out. It's time (for them] to be refreshed." To face the problem, last year the Joint Labor Council, which represents all unionized labor on campus, met with the university's Plant Operations department to work together on how to improve conditions. Council Chairman Dan Westbrook considered the problems imperative. "The conditions of the classrooms have a direct impact on the educational activity," he said. "If a teacher has to spend class lime to deal with sticky floors and dirty wipe-boards, then it's going to affect the class quality." The meeting resulted in a proposed "fix-it list" of items in need of repair, which was submitted by teachers and faculty. "[The council] was not out to find fault, but to work together to improve conditions. We have a great working relationship." Boyd said. Instructors placed more than 250 repair requests on the fix-it list. Faculty members listed everything from cleaning light fixtures to ceiling repair. When Plant Operations got to work, they conducted $30,000 worth of repairs in three months. By the end of last year, they had accomplished close to 70 percent of the list. But Boyd is facing a lack of funding and personnel in his campaign for repair. "We have two full time painters again for the first time since the paint shop was closed in 1992," he said Because of cutbacks, the entire university was maintained by part-time painters for the last five years. Boyd said that the university should have six painters soon, but he has enough work right now to keep 20 painters busy. Meanwhile, there arc only 49 custodial staff members in charge of the cleaning and upkeep on every classroom and office on campus. The lack of personnel and resources comes from a shortage of money. According to Boyd, there are several major projects that are in the process of being pursued, but budgets are not keeping up with the cost inflation of supplies. "Our operations and maintenance funds are staying at a consistent level, and they're not keeping up with inflation," he said. "And we still have to use some equipment that dates back to the 1960s." The light at the end of the tunnel for renovation is the support of President Welty's office. The president's office has pledged $ 100,000 of support for classroom repair this year. This brings the total budget for class repair to $350,000. Stiff not enough money According to Astone.'s office, that is enough money to aesthetically renovate 23 classrooms. Fifty classrooms have been slated for help, so this year's renovations would mean almost half would be fixed by next spring. The major reconstruction funding this school year is going towards matters of safety rather than environment or aesthetics. Joyal Administration is slated for a much needed refurbishing of its poorly designed ventilation system. McLane Hall is in for a $6-million- iloll.tr full renovation. Reconstruction projects are still few and far between, however, due to their expense. Limited funds for such projects puts their priority behind building new facilities, which are usually funded through bond issues. "We have to compete with the prisons, the elementary schools, the high schools and the community colleges for our money," Boyd said, "It will take millions of dollars to get this place to where it needs to be." In five to ten years the department of facilities planning hopes to have -I all 50 of the classrooms on campus revitalized. Kessler said that that was too long to wait for this kind of action. "If you want people to take themselves seriously, you have to create a physical environment that they can excel in," he said, "How can you aspire to excellence in the midst of deterioration." Insight Linda Bkkford Cindy Bright REPORTERS Cherie Arambel. Cora Ash. Linda Bkkford, Jill Blevins. Chyra Bonner. tutUn C«lo. Autumn Cobb, Eira Danciu, Scon Former, Luis He Victor Hcmandcj Ahmed Hussain, Karen Giese. Tiffany Massey. Christine Mirigian. Donna Raminu-Bakcr, Tricia Smith, Diane Sorondo. Jenny Starts. Yuen Too. Mali VaWei. Derek Walter. Mick Winjert SUPPORT STAFF Adviser Greg Lewis Students of MCJ 143 To advertise call: 278-3934 HOW TO REACH US FAST... MAIL IT H E-MAIL IT On Campus: Send your message to insight 9csufresno.edu FAXIT Editor, Insight FAX (209) 278-4995 VOICE IT Call 278-2892 any til .
Object Description
Title | 1997_10 Insight October 1997 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Dept. of Journalism, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1997 |
Description | Weekly during the school year. Vol. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 8, 1969)-v. 29, no. 23 (May 13, 1998). Ceased with May 13, 1998, issue. Title from masthead. Merged with Daily collegian. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno Periodicals |
Contributors | California State University, Fresno Dept. of Journalism |
Coverage | October 8, 1969 – May 13, 1998 |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 “E-image data” |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | Insight Oct 1 1997 p 2 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publication Date | 1997 |
Full-Text-Search |
2 ~:.~ \^ewPoint & News
Insight
Opinion
Take this wake-up call,
NASA, before someone dies
by Draeger Martinez
Plenttof things pose safety
and health risks these days.
Crime, pollution, diet drugs
that weaken heart valves — it's a
tough world out there.
But it seems that no amount of
analysis, studies, estimates, charts
or warnings sinks in with many
people. Every weekend, some drunk
Fresnan tells herself she can drive
home just fine. Each lover's night,
some guy somewhere thinks he can
have unprotected sex "just this
once."
The only wake-up call that
dependably conveys the message,
the one that grabs attention to a
problem and quick: when somebody
dies from Ihe problem.
Take a hard-partying high school.
Then suppose one popular kid, just
one. dies from some risky activity.
Within days, the school gets
religion about that particular risk,
even if they continue ignoring
others.
And when Princess Diana died
last month, many saw the tragedy as
an overdue warning about the
intrusive, even harassing nature of
the "stalkerazzi."
Well, there are a couple of
disasters waiting to happen that
haven't yet. They can be prevented
now, before anybody has to drive
the point home with their deaths.
And our very own ail-American
space agency, NASA, can do the job
in both cases.
One space-borne hazard zone is
the Mir space station. I have huge
respect for the cosmonauts that have
wrung so much use out of Mir,
which has been in orbit more than
twice its planned design life.
But with the station's recent
collisions, blackouts and other
problems, isn't every extra day the
crew spends up there another roll of
the dice? Snake eyes has to come
around sometime, with fatal results.
So save the lives aboard Mir,
NASA. Wrap up the experiments,
get the cosmic travelers an express
taxi home (maybe a space shuttle
with yellow-checkered heat tiles)
and give those folks a heroic
welcome back. While they're still
alive to enjoy it.
As tragic as the loss of life in a
Mir disaster would be. NASA has
another launch soon that could yield
an even bigger catastrophe.
On Oct. 13, the space agency
plans to send a big exploratory probe toward Saturn.
It's called Cassini, its power plant is
fueled by 72 pounds of ultra-toxic
plutonium-238. and it will threaten
the lives of thousands on Earth, not
once but twice.
City University of New York
physicist Michio Kaku has said
NASA has deliberately underestimated the risks with Cassini. He
figures that if the probe were to
explode during its launch or shortly
afterward, the plutonium on board
would hit the atmosphere and give
200,000 people cancer that would
kill them within a few years.
The plutonium-238 isotope is
among the most radioactive, and
cancer-causing, known to man.
While a launch accident would not
radioactivity could plague Florida
for centuries.
And that's merely the first time
Cassini poses a risk.
Once Cassini is launched, its
trajectory includes two big swings
around Venus and a pass within 500
miles of Earth.
Each swerve is meant to "slingshot" the probe, giving it gravity-
boosted acceleration into deep
space.
If a problem occurs with the
Earth flyby, there's no telling
who could find themselves
needing a 6,000-strcngth sunblock.
It could be India, Bosnia, Rwanda
— or California.
NASA officials say the risks are
minuscule and accounted for. They
say that Cassini has to rely on
plutonium fuel to reach Saturn and
study its icy rings, and that (health-
friendly) solar energy cells won't
pack enough power.
But Kaku and other skeptics say
solar power would be enough, if
NASA would simply leave out one
or two of Cassini's 12 instruments.
Or for that matter, maybe someone
can develop more densely-packed
solar cells, like Intel recently did
with flash-memory transistors that
double their chips' capacity.
The point is, why is NASA in
such a hurry to send this probe,
when it poses even a "minuscule"
risk of horrific cancer deaths?
There's normore Cold War adversaries looking over our shoulder.
Saturn's rings will still be there if
better solar cells take five or 10, or
50 or 100, years to develop.
The agency says it can't rebuild
or redesign the Cassini probe, which
cost $3.4 billion. But wouldn't
throwing that money away still be a
bargain compared to risking all
those lives?
Draeger Martinez is the Chief ■
Copy Editor for Insight.
DEAL: Estimates suggest savings
of $258 million ovet five years
Continued from page 1
from private industry and sold under
CSU auspices.
According to comments in the
memo, 'the CETI Corp. would apparently own, operate and control the
CSU technology infrastructure from
the workstations to the mainframes,
the cables to the software."
Job security within the CSU system is also an issue under the CETI
plan. The Business Plan Summary
states, "CETI will make every effort
to retain full time CSU employees in
their current job classifications. In addition, they will allow them to maintain an identity with their parent organization and retain their seniority
and full benefits."
Savings expected
The CETI plan is also predicted to
save $147.5 million in the CSU budget from 1997 to 1999. according to
the Business Plan Summary.
Over a five-year projection, estimated savings will be more than $258
million.
Budget savings are expected from "Information —■—
Technology Expenditures,
Infrastructure Deployment, Student Services and
Support Costs," as stated in
the summary.
CSU spokesman Ken
Swisher said the contract
could be implemented by the end of
this year.
"The idea is to get all of our campuses working together," he said.
Proposed infrastructure timeline
Upgrade to baseline infrastructure for
19981 aU campus libraries, computer labs
and faculty offices.
1QQQ* uP6Tade 12 selected campuses and
127277* all campus administrative offices.
2000* ComPIete upgrade of remaining 11
|