Insight Apr 22 1998 p 5 |
Previous | 11 of 22 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Extended Forecast: S moggy It looks like a beautiful summer morning in the San Joaquin Valley. From the kitchen window the sky seems clear and blue. But from the front door, the air is just a wall of brown smog. Many days during the year, thick, stagnate air covers the San Joaquin Valley. On some days, The People's Church, which is only a few blocks away from Fresno State, is nearly invisible. So too is the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, though it is just more than an hour away. The wind blows so much dust, pollen and smog through the air that at times, it is almost impossible to breathe. Some who go outside are plagued with watery eyes and runny noses. Many can't stop coughing and sneezing. Since the Valley is surrounded on all sides by mountains, air pollution becomes trapped within the bowl of the Valley. This leads to the harmful pollution levels. Air pollution in the San Joaquin Valley is dangerous to the people, environment and economy. Though there have been recent improvements in pollution levels. Valley air pollution rates are well above federal allowances. The Valley is in serious non-attainment of federal standards for both ozone (O,) and total suspended panicles (TSPor PM10). Federal standards allow three days in a three-year period to be above approved levels. Last year, Fresno was above federal standards 19 times. The problem used to be even worse. In previous years of non- attainment, the Valley would average 44-45 days above federal standards. The passing of the Clean Air Act in 1970 improved the quality of air, not just in the San Joaquin Valley, but the entire country. But the Valley has not come far enough. The Valley is required to reach federal attainment standards by November 1999. Joset Merced Bello and Wayne Clark of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Pollution Control District, think this is unlikely. If the Valley has not reached attainment more stringent regulation will be imposed. "Modeling projects will eventually lower the pollution levels to federal standards," Clark said. Recent reviews of ozone levels show it is unlikely the Valley will reach federal standards. The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to re-evaluate the San Joaquin Valley in mid 2000. It is likely the Valley will be re-classified from serious to severe non-attainment of the ozone standard. If this happens, the Valley will be given six more years to reach attainment. and will be expected to submit a plan of action. Increasing population of the Valley makes it difficult to lower pollution levels because tbere are more automobiles traveling further distances. The Valley's population is expected to double. Urban sprawl will force residents of the Valley to travel further to work caused by ai creases plan ' We're probably second in line and to run errands. Improve- _. - . ments in emission standards help tO LOS jr\ngel€S in ozone problem. Lower emission levels help prevent pollution levels from skyrocketing as the Valley's population continues to grow. High pollution levels can lead to a number of health, environmental and economic problems. Air pollution causes short- term respiratory infections, as well as chronic heart and respiratory problems. Short term exposure to air pollution can lead to nausea and dizziness. Every year, pollution causes more than $115 billion in losses from crop damage Bello said. Ozone causes 98 percent of damage. pollution to agriculture. Pollution de- yield and fruit size, injures leaves. stems and roots and kills plants. According to the California Air Resource Board, the Valley annually "• 25 percent of its grape crop: • 16 percent of its cotton yield; • 30 percent of its orange yield: and f •40 percent of its potato yield. Nationally, pollution reduces crop yield by more than S5 billion a year. "We're probably second in line to Los Angeles in ozone levels." Clark said. Air pollution has existed since the first volcano erupted. The problem initially thought to only be in London, where Criteria Pollutants levels." WAYNE CLARK San Joaquin Valley Unified Pollution Control District GASSES sulfur dioxide carbon monoxide ozone hydrocarbons nitrogen dioxide RESULTS toxic to plants; causes acid rain; irritates respiratory tract headaches; dizziness; impaires perception; fatal irritates respiratory tract and eyes forms ozone; causes cancer irritates respiratory tract; toxic to plants; forms ozone and add rain LIQUIDS & SOLIDS RESULTS particulate matter irritates respiratory tract; corrodes damages nervous system, blood and kidneys see AIR, page 6 photos by Mahito Tomoi A machine at the Air Quality Monitoring Station in Clovis collects samples of air from outside then is pumped through a filter to pick up the dust. The filter is changed twice a week because of Fresno's poor air quality. George Jung attends the machines that check levels of ozone, nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide and other air contaminants and print results. The view from Fresno State near the Clovis Corporation yard where the San Jc^quin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District tests samples of the city's air is evidence of the poor air quality. photo by Mahito Tomoi Insight Special § April 22,1998
Object Description
Title | 1998_04 Insight April 1998 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Dept. of Journalism, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1998 |
Description | Weekly during the school year. Vol. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 8, 1969)-v. 29, no. 23 (May 13, 1998). Ceased with May 13, 1998, issue. Title from masthead. Merged with Daily collegian. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno Periodicals |
Contributors | California State University, Fresno Dept. of Journalism |
Coverage | October 8, 1969 – May 13, 1998 |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35mm |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 “E-image data” |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | Insight Apr 22 1998 p 5 |
Alternative Title | Insight (California State University, Fresno) |
Publication Date | 1998 |
Full-Text-Search | Extended Forecast: S moggy It looks like a beautiful summer morning in the San Joaquin Valley. From the kitchen window the sky seems clear and blue. But from the front door, the air is just a wall of brown smog. Many days during the year, thick, stagnate air covers the San Joaquin Valley. On some days, The People's Church, which is only a few blocks away from Fresno State, is nearly invisible. So too is the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, though it is just more than an hour away. The wind blows so much dust, pollen and smog through the air that at times, it is almost impossible to breathe. Some who go outside are plagued with watery eyes and runny noses. Many can't stop coughing and sneezing. Since the Valley is surrounded on all sides by mountains, air pollution becomes trapped within the bowl of the Valley. This leads to the harmful pollution levels. Air pollution in the San Joaquin Valley is dangerous to the people, environment and economy. Though there have been recent improvements in pollution levels. Valley air pollution rates are well above federal allowances. The Valley is in serious non-attainment of federal standards for both ozone (O,) and total suspended panicles (TSPor PM10). Federal standards allow three days in a three-year period to be above approved levels. Last year, Fresno was above federal standards 19 times. The problem used to be even worse. In previous years of non- attainment, the Valley would average 44-45 days above federal standards. The passing of the Clean Air Act in 1970 improved the quality of air, not just in the San Joaquin Valley, but the entire country. But the Valley has not come far enough. The Valley is required to reach federal attainment standards by November 1999. Joset Merced Bello and Wayne Clark of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Pollution Control District, think this is unlikely. If the Valley has not reached attainment more stringent regulation will be imposed. "Modeling projects will eventually lower the pollution levels to federal standards," Clark said. Recent reviews of ozone levels show it is unlikely the Valley will reach federal standards. The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to re-evaluate the San Joaquin Valley in mid 2000. It is likely the Valley will be re-classified from serious to severe non-attainment of the ozone standard. If this happens, the Valley will be given six more years to reach attainment. and will be expected to submit a plan of action. Increasing population of the Valley makes it difficult to lower pollution levels because tbere are more automobiles traveling further distances. The Valley's population is expected to double. Urban sprawl will force residents of the Valley to travel further to work caused by ai creases plan ' We're probably second in line and to run errands. Improve- _. - . ments in emission standards help tO LOS jr\ngel€S in ozone problem. Lower emission levels help prevent pollution levels from skyrocketing as the Valley's population continues to grow. High pollution levels can lead to a number of health, environmental and economic problems. Air pollution causes short- term respiratory infections, as well as chronic heart and respiratory problems. Short term exposure to air pollution can lead to nausea and dizziness. Every year, pollution causes more than $115 billion in losses from crop damage Bello said. Ozone causes 98 percent of damage. pollution to agriculture. Pollution de- yield and fruit size, injures leaves. stems and roots and kills plants. According to the California Air Resource Board, the Valley annually "• 25 percent of its grape crop: • 16 percent of its cotton yield; • 30 percent of its orange yield: and f •40 percent of its potato yield. Nationally, pollution reduces crop yield by more than S5 billion a year. "We're probably second in line to Los Angeles in ozone levels." Clark said. Air pollution has existed since the first volcano erupted. The problem initially thought to only be in London, where Criteria Pollutants levels." WAYNE CLARK San Joaquin Valley Unified Pollution Control District GASSES sulfur dioxide carbon monoxide ozone hydrocarbons nitrogen dioxide RESULTS toxic to plants; causes acid rain; irritates respiratory tract headaches; dizziness; impaires perception; fatal irritates respiratory tract and eyes forms ozone; causes cancer irritates respiratory tract; toxic to plants; forms ozone and add rain LIQUIDS & SOLIDS RESULTS particulate matter irritates respiratory tract; corrodes damages nervous system, blood and kidneys see AIR, page 6 photos by Mahito Tomoi A machine at the Air Quality Monitoring Station in Clovis collects samples of air from outside then is pumped through a filter to pick up the dust. The filter is changed twice a week because of Fresno's poor air quality. George Jung attends the machines that check levels of ozone, nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide and other air contaminants and print results. The view from Fresno State near the Clovis Corporation yard where the San Jc^quin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District tests samples of the city's air is evidence of the poor air quality. photo by Mahito Tomoi Insight Special § April 22,1998 |