November 1994 Page 6 |
Previous | 6 of 8 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
6—A&E Hye Sharzhoom November 1994 ■ Armen Babakhanian performed before a standing room only audience at the inaugural concert of the Philip Lorenz Memorial Keyboard Concerts series on September 22 at the Wahlberg Concert Hall on the CSUF campus. Babakhanian'sconcertwas co-sponsored by the Armenian Studies Program and Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Organization of Fresno. A native of Yerevan, Babakhanian has been a recent prize winner in several of the world's prestigious international piano competitions, including the Van Cliburn, the Dublin, the Gina Bachauer, and the William Kappell. Babakhanian studied at the Tchaikovsky Special Music School and Yerevan Conservatory of Music, where he studied with Anahlt Bogdanian for a decade. Babakhanian wasfeatured in the award winning documentary of the Ninth Van Cliburn Competition, A Life in Music, which aired nationwide on PBS stations. Karabagh's legacy explored in new book By Barlow Der Mugrdechian AHISTORYOFQARABAGH: An Annotated Translation of Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi's Tarikh-e Qarabagh by George A. Boumoutian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 1994. 157 pp. 5 maps. This handsomely bound and produced book sheds new light on an issue, the Armenian- Azerbaijani dispute over the historical claim to Karabagh, which is much in the news. Since the dissolution ofthe former Soviet Union in 1991 and even earlier, beginning in 1988, the question as to the eventual political fate of Karabagh has turned into a full scale war of aggression waged by Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Karabagh. Six years of warfare, including the targeting of civilian populations by aircraft have not been able to suppress the spirit of the Armenians. The academic debate, while waged with weapons different than guns and planes, has become increasingly contentious in the past few years. The Azerbaijani government attempt to distort the history of the Karabagh region has reached new heights under the leadership of the Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences. That is why the work by George Boumoutian is so valuable, not only to scholars but also to the general public. George A. Boumoutian, a scholar and teacher with a firm grasp of Armenian, Persian, Russian, and Turkish, has previously focused his attention on Armenia under Persian rule, especially in the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries (cf. The Khanate of Erevan under Qajar Rule, 1795-1828). The volume under review examines a primary source for the history of Karabagh during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Most ofthe primary sources on the history of Karabagh for the period are in Persian. The earliest work is one'by Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi, which Boumoutian has translated, and added material to, to make the current volume. Mirza Jamal (1774-1853) was the scion of the well-known Javanshir family, hereditary rulers in an area which encompasses today's Karabagh. During his lifetime, Mirza Jamal was an eye-witness to most of the major political changes which occurred in the region of Karabagh. He spent most of his life in official service, as a provincial secretary whereby he had access to most of the correspondence between neighboring empires. Mirza Jamal's history is undated, but internal evidence suggests it was written between 1840- 1844. Boumoutian uses the 1877/ 1878 version of the manuscript, (there are perhaps three variant manuscript versions), and details the authenticity of the manuscript. In his introduction, Boumoutian carefully details the three other Persian primary sources for the period in question, and discusses their relationship and usefulness compared with Mirza Jamal's history. Chronicles of the history ofthe shahs of Iran from the seventeenth to the nineteenth cen turies are also adequately discussed to give a fuller picture of the available resources for study. Arab and Persian geographers are also cited as sources for the study of the region. Boumoutian also outlines the Armenian presence in Karabagh from the second century to the present, in a clear and convincing manner. The body of the text, divided into seven chapters, is Mirza Jamal's account of the history of the region. It is followed by a bibliography, index, and then a facsimile copy ofthe text (in Persian) used in the translation. The five maps at the beginning of the text are extremely useful in situating and familiarizing the reader to the general area. Specific area maps of Karabagh in the late eighteenth century are particularly useful. In the continuing academic debate, this volume is a welcome objective addition. Since it comes from an eyewitness source, the history speaks for itself in demonstrating the ancient Armenian presence on the land. Boumoutian's careful attention to detail in the introduction adds necessary explanatory material. For the general reader, the work answers many questions about the history of Karabagh. For specialists, the book provides meaningful material. For all those who care to enter the waters muddied by official Azerbaijani distortion and falsification, this work is essential reading. TEACH, from p. 3 ference in perception and orientation," Bedirian said. "Armenians simply had attitudes and ways of doing things that were different from those of Americans." Der Mugrdechian also helped to break down the barriers of the past. In teaching English at Yerevan State University, DerMugrdechian worked with students who were accustomed to classroom dictation drills and textbooks that depicted life in Britain during the 1940s. Along with incorporating recent articles from newspapers and magazines into her curriculum, Der Mugrdechian involved her students in real-world role play settings and introduced new techniques to broaden their vocabulary. "They were very pleased that they could talk freely without being constantly corrected," Der Mugrdechian explained, "and that they could write in their journals without having their books returned all marked up." Toomajanian's contributions were more at a personal level. Teaching a psychology class to teenagers, Toomajanian became a sounding board for the feelings and aspirations of her students. "I think they appreciated feeling free to question, to express their feelings, and hearing my fresh point of view as an American," Toomajanian said. Hope for the future The people also implanted, almost inexplicably, a sense of hope among the TFA participants. Der Mugrdechian sees a light at the end ofthe tunnel for Armenia, even if it is not yet apparent to the people of the republic. In the meantime, those beyond Armenia's borders have a role to play in guiding the country forward. "When Armenians see people from abroad working there for $2 a month, it's very uplifting for their morale. They see that there are people who care about them. Anyone who comes is very, very important," emphasized Der Mugrdechian. "I saw many things," Bedirian later reflected, "that led me to believe that whatever is decent and worthy in Armenia will be preserved — an incorrigible sense of humor and generosity among the people for one — and for another a cultural heritage that refuses to die." For more information Tihose interested in participating in the TFA program should contact Barlow Der Mugrdechian of the Armenian Studies Program, California State University, Fresno, Fresno, California, 93740-0004. Applications for the Fall 1995 and Spring 1996 semesters are now being accepted. Call 209-278-2669 for an information packet. COX, from p.1 every other month, was especially destructive. Beginning in January of 1992, the Azeris announced that GRAD missies would be used against the civilian population. Up to 400 missiles a day rained upon Stepanakert, with each missile capable of destroying an apartment building. Supplies had been totally cut off to the city. Armenians waited up to five hours a day in the freezing cold to get two buckets of water. Though living in dark and cold cellars they kept up their spirits by performing plays. Where was the United Nations and the world community when 40% of Artsakh was overrun? Where was the condemnation of Azeri aggression? Asked the defiant speaker who admits that three and half years ago she would not have known where to find Karabagh. Lady Cox outlined five major themes concerning her humanitarian and human rights work: 1) Azerbaijan as the primary aggressor in the war, 2) challenges involved in providing humanitarian aid to Karabagh, 3) brief chronology of events in the area, 4) the way ahead, 5) tribute to the people of Karabagh. Her frequent visits to Karabagh have moved her and Christian Solidarity International from complete impartiality to advocacy on the part of the Armenians of Karabagh. The evidence points to an asymmetry of aggression in the conflict. There is incontrovertible proof that Azerbaijan is a primary aggressor for five reasons. a) The brutal deportation efforts attempting to force out Armenians out of Karabagh. b) An asymmetry of violence of human rights. Azerbaijan has blockaded both Armenia and Karabagh, assisted by Turkey. Armenia and Karabagh are for the most part cut off from the rest of the world. c) The Azeris were the first to use weapons of indiscriminate terror against a civilian population. d) Only Azerbaijan has utilized aerial bombing, with cluster bombs that cause multiple injuries to civilians. e) Only Azeris uses ground to air missiles designed to detonate at a height calculated to cause maximum damage, and to which children and civilians are especially vulnerable. These five points caused Christian Solidarity International (CSI) to consider Armenians as primary victims. CSI tries to assist and to be a voice for people who are victims of aggression. Many of the major aid organizations will not and cannot for political reasons enter Karabagh due to the fact the region is not recognized as an independent country and the government of Azerbaijan refuses to allow assistance to reach Karabagh. The civilians of Karabagh have suffered terribly through bombing. Faced with the challenge of not being able to turn to an established organization Lady Cox contacted CSI to help. Within two weeks of her initial visit to Karabagh she found and acquired many tons See COX, Page 8
Object Description
Title | 1994_11 Hye Sharzhoom Newspaper November 1994 |
Alternative Title | Armenian Action, Vol. 16 No. 1, November 1994; Ethnic Supplement to the Collegian. |
Publisher | Armenian Studies Program, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1994 |
Description | Published two to four times a year. The newspaper of the California State University, Fresno Armenian Students Organization and Armenian Studies Program. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno – Periodicals. |
Contributors | Armenian Studies Program; Armenian Students Organization, California State University, Fresno. |
Coverage | 1979-2014 |
Format | Newspaper print |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | Scanned at 200-360 dpi, 18-bit greyscale - 24-bit color, TIFF or PDF. PDFs were converted to TIF using Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro. |
Description
Title | November 1994 Page 6 |
Full-Text-Search | 6—A&E Hye Sharzhoom November 1994 ■ Armen Babakhanian performed before a standing room only audience at the inaugural concert of the Philip Lorenz Memorial Keyboard Concerts series on September 22 at the Wahlberg Concert Hall on the CSUF campus. Babakhanian'sconcertwas co-sponsored by the Armenian Studies Program and Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Organization of Fresno. A native of Yerevan, Babakhanian has been a recent prize winner in several of the world's prestigious international piano competitions, including the Van Cliburn, the Dublin, the Gina Bachauer, and the William Kappell. Babakhanian studied at the Tchaikovsky Special Music School and Yerevan Conservatory of Music, where he studied with Anahlt Bogdanian for a decade. Babakhanian wasfeatured in the award winning documentary of the Ninth Van Cliburn Competition, A Life in Music, which aired nationwide on PBS stations. Karabagh's legacy explored in new book By Barlow Der Mugrdechian AHISTORYOFQARABAGH: An Annotated Translation of Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi's Tarikh-e Qarabagh by George A. Boumoutian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 1994. 157 pp. 5 maps. This handsomely bound and produced book sheds new light on an issue, the Armenian- Azerbaijani dispute over the historical claim to Karabagh, which is much in the news. Since the dissolution ofthe former Soviet Union in 1991 and even earlier, beginning in 1988, the question as to the eventual political fate of Karabagh has turned into a full scale war of aggression waged by Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Karabagh. Six years of warfare, including the targeting of civilian populations by aircraft have not been able to suppress the spirit of the Armenians. The academic debate, while waged with weapons different than guns and planes, has become increasingly contentious in the past few years. The Azerbaijani government attempt to distort the history of the Karabagh region has reached new heights under the leadership of the Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences. That is why the work by George Boumoutian is so valuable, not only to scholars but also to the general public. George A. Boumoutian, a scholar and teacher with a firm grasp of Armenian, Persian, Russian, and Turkish, has previously focused his attention on Armenia under Persian rule, especially in the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries (cf. The Khanate of Erevan under Qajar Rule, 1795-1828). The volume under review examines a primary source for the history of Karabagh during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Most ofthe primary sources on the history of Karabagh for the period are in Persian. The earliest work is one'by Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi, which Boumoutian has translated, and added material to, to make the current volume. Mirza Jamal (1774-1853) was the scion of the well-known Javanshir family, hereditary rulers in an area which encompasses today's Karabagh. During his lifetime, Mirza Jamal was an eye-witness to most of the major political changes which occurred in the region of Karabagh. He spent most of his life in official service, as a provincial secretary whereby he had access to most of the correspondence between neighboring empires. Mirza Jamal's history is undated, but internal evidence suggests it was written between 1840- 1844. Boumoutian uses the 1877/ 1878 version of the manuscript, (there are perhaps three variant manuscript versions), and details the authenticity of the manuscript. In his introduction, Boumoutian carefully details the three other Persian primary sources for the period in question, and discusses their relationship and usefulness compared with Mirza Jamal's history. Chronicles of the history ofthe shahs of Iran from the seventeenth to the nineteenth cen turies are also adequately discussed to give a fuller picture of the available resources for study. Arab and Persian geographers are also cited as sources for the study of the region. Boumoutian also outlines the Armenian presence in Karabagh from the second century to the present, in a clear and convincing manner. The body of the text, divided into seven chapters, is Mirza Jamal's account of the history of the region. It is followed by a bibliography, index, and then a facsimile copy ofthe text (in Persian) used in the translation. The five maps at the beginning of the text are extremely useful in situating and familiarizing the reader to the general area. Specific area maps of Karabagh in the late eighteenth century are particularly useful. In the continuing academic debate, this volume is a welcome objective addition. Since it comes from an eyewitness source, the history speaks for itself in demonstrating the ancient Armenian presence on the land. Boumoutian's careful attention to detail in the introduction adds necessary explanatory material. For the general reader, the work answers many questions about the history of Karabagh. For specialists, the book provides meaningful material. For all those who care to enter the waters muddied by official Azerbaijani distortion and falsification, this work is essential reading. TEACH, from p. 3 ference in perception and orientation," Bedirian said. "Armenians simply had attitudes and ways of doing things that were different from those of Americans." Der Mugrdechian also helped to break down the barriers of the past. In teaching English at Yerevan State University, DerMugrdechian worked with students who were accustomed to classroom dictation drills and textbooks that depicted life in Britain during the 1940s. Along with incorporating recent articles from newspapers and magazines into her curriculum, Der Mugrdechian involved her students in real-world role play settings and introduced new techniques to broaden their vocabulary. "They were very pleased that they could talk freely without being constantly corrected," Der Mugrdechian explained, "and that they could write in their journals without having their books returned all marked up." Toomajanian's contributions were more at a personal level. Teaching a psychology class to teenagers, Toomajanian became a sounding board for the feelings and aspirations of her students. "I think they appreciated feeling free to question, to express their feelings, and hearing my fresh point of view as an American," Toomajanian said. Hope for the future The people also implanted, almost inexplicably, a sense of hope among the TFA participants. Der Mugrdechian sees a light at the end ofthe tunnel for Armenia, even if it is not yet apparent to the people of the republic. In the meantime, those beyond Armenia's borders have a role to play in guiding the country forward. "When Armenians see people from abroad working there for $2 a month, it's very uplifting for their morale. They see that there are people who care about them. Anyone who comes is very, very important," emphasized Der Mugrdechian. "I saw many things," Bedirian later reflected, "that led me to believe that whatever is decent and worthy in Armenia will be preserved — an incorrigible sense of humor and generosity among the people for one — and for another a cultural heritage that refuses to die." For more information Tihose interested in participating in the TFA program should contact Barlow Der Mugrdechian of the Armenian Studies Program, California State University, Fresno, Fresno, California, 93740-0004. Applications for the Fall 1995 and Spring 1996 semesters are now being accepted. Call 209-278-2669 for an information packet. COX, from p.1 every other month, was especially destructive. Beginning in January of 1992, the Azeris announced that GRAD missies would be used against the civilian population. Up to 400 missiles a day rained upon Stepanakert, with each missile capable of destroying an apartment building. Supplies had been totally cut off to the city. Armenians waited up to five hours a day in the freezing cold to get two buckets of water. Though living in dark and cold cellars they kept up their spirits by performing plays. Where was the United Nations and the world community when 40% of Artsakh was overrun? Where was the condemnation of Azeri aggression? Asked the defiant speaker who admits that three and half years ago she would not have known where to find Karabagh. Lady Cox outlined five major themes concerning her humanitarian and human rights work: 1) Azerbaijan as the primary aggressor in the war, 2) challenges involved in providing humanitarian aid to Karabagh, 3) brief chronology of events in the area, 4) the way ahead, 5) tribute to the people of Karabagh. Her frequent visits to Karabagh have moved her and Christian Solidarity International from complete impartiality to advocacy on the part of the Armenians of Karabagh. The evidence points to an asymmetry of aggression in the conflict. There is incontrovertible proof that Azerbaijan is a primary aggressor for five reasons. a) The brutal deportation efforts attempting to force out Armenians out of Karabagh. b) An asymmetry of violence of human rights. Azerbaijan has blockaded both Armenia and Karabagh, assisted by Turkey. Armenia and Karabagh are for the most part cut off from the rest of the world. c) The Azeris were the first to use weapons of indiscriminate terror against a civilian population. d) Only Azerbaijan has utilized aerial bombing, with cluster bombs that cause multiple injuries to civilians. e) Only Azeris uses ground to air missiles designed to detonate at a height calculated to cause maximum damage, and to which children and civilians are especially vulnerable. These five points caused Christian Solidarity International (CSI) to consider Armenians as primary victims. CSI tries to assist and to be a voice for people who are victims of aggression. Many of the major aid organizations will not and cannot for political reasons enter Karabagh due to the fact the region is not recognized as an independent country and the government of Azerbaijan refuses to allow assistance to reach Karabagh. The civilians of Karabagh have suffered terribly through bombing. Faced with the challenge of not being able to turn to an established organization Lady Cox contacted CSI to help. Within two weeks of her initial visit to Karabagh she found and acquired many tons See COX, Page 8 |