April 1979, Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
4U.8 OU-Pd-flMP The Armenian Movement Armenian Martyrs' Week, April 16-241979 Armenocide: Crime Against Humanity By MARK MALKASIAN The Twentieth century has no place for the Armenian genocide. A world immersed in suffering no longer senses human tragedy. The modern age has been saturated by tragedy~ graphic, explicit and vociferous tragedy. World sympathy exists as a commodity, a commodity staked and monopolized. It belongs to Jews, Blacks, Indians and Palestinians. The Armenocide cannot compete for the world's tears. Of course, Armenians can produce corpses—two million corpses—but the Armenocide remains relegated to history's back burner. The Armenian Case is not a pressing international topic. There are no fanatical guerillas, struggling for national identity in the mountains of Turkish- occupied Armenia. The Armenians have no charismatic leader, suitable for 45- second tirades on the evening news. The Armenians only have the stark, numbing reality of the Armenocide. The facts are simple: On April 24, 1915 the Turkish government began the systematic annhilation of the Armenian people - the "final solution" of the Armenian problem. Under the guise of World War I, two million Armenians were murdered. The Armenian people were torn from the homeland they had occupied since the dawn of civilization. Three thousand years of Armenian history were abruptly severed by a single, savage blow of the Turkish sword. Of course, there are outcries among the Western powers. Armenia was a valuable playing card of international diplomacy. The 1920 Treaty of Sevres, promoted by the Western Powers, provided for the establishment of an inde- Survivors of the Armenocide of 1915! Many of the orphans miraculously the later Turkish to perish from prepetrated were famine and disease. See Page 3 spared the fate of their parents during The Armenian Case in the UN By BRYAN BEDROSIAN The Armenian Case, embodying the national aspirations of the world's six million Armenians, is today expressed in the form of Paragraph 30. Paragraph 30 is one section of a large report being prepared by a Special Rapporteur for the UN Subcommission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. This subcommission is part of the larger UN Commission on Human Rights. Paragraph 30, as quoted from the Genocide Report, reads: "Passing to the modern era, one may note the existence of relatively full documentation dealing with the massacres of Armenians, which have been described as the 'first case of genocide in the twentieth century'." If accepted, Paragraph 30 would provide at least the legal basis for the return of Turkish-occupied Armenia. In response to Turkish pressures, Paragraph 30 was omitted from a previous draft of the Genocide Report, adopted last September by the UN Subcommission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities. The 'United States abstained in the final vote. The Special Rapporteur cited three reasons for rejecting Paragraph 30: 1. It is impossible to compile an exhaustive list of historical examples of genocide. 2. It is important to maintain unity within the international community in regard to genocide. 3. In many cases, delving into the past might reopen old wounds that are now healing. Like the Armenian people, Paragraph 30 has not disappeared. It was reintroduced and approved by the UN Commission on Human Rights. (The Commission had the power to reject the Genocide Report, accept it, or send it back to the Special Rapporteur.) Despite heated protests by the Turkish government, the subcommission in its March meeting in Geneva, reendorsed insertion and voted to send the Report back to the Special Kapporteur for reconsideration. Paragraph 30 today lies in the hands of the Special Rapporteur. Paragraph 30 demonstrates the influence a united Armenian people can have. The reconsideration of Paragraph 30 was a major victory in itself, especially considering the strong objections and strenuous lobbying of the Turkish government. The Armenian people, without a nation, without an army-seemingly powerless in the international arena- succeeded in bringing the Armenocide before the nations of the world. U.S. Ambassador Set Momjian, the personal representative of President Carter on the UN Human Rights Commission, was instrumental in forcefully presenting the facts of the Armenocide before the world body. Varaz-an Inspired Armenian Artist . .';.j') ?JJ By BARLOW DER MUGRDICHIAN Varaz Samuelian is an artist of international reknown, famous both for his paintings and sculpture. I have known Varaz for many years and I interviewed him while he was at work in his studio. Varaz, when did you come to Fresno, California and why? "After World War II in which I fought both as a Russian partisan and as a French partisan I came to San Francisco to be with my brother in November, 1946. My wife and I had friends in Fresno so in 1957 we moved to Fresno. I moved also because I wanted to live in a community where there were a lot of Armenians." - - . What inspires you as an artist? "Everything inspires me. I am against war of any kind, especially nuclear war, and the quest tor peace inspires me. The ocean and the sky and the trees inspire me. But I find that the struggle for war and peace is very important to me." You sculpted the now famous David of Sassoon sculpture which now stands in the Fresno Courthouse square. Why did you make David of Sassoon? "The legend of David, the heroic story of a people inspired me. For me, he embodies the powerful symbol of the Armenian spirit of freedom. He embodies the spirit and history of Armenia. But more than that David of Sassoon stands for all the courageous fighters against oppression...Man striving for justice and peace." Which forms of art do you prefer to work with? "All are the same. Sculpture, painting all are the same to me. If you can do one you can do them all. It's all in the way you look at it." You are influenced by many things but what keeps you working as an artist? "Learning, the experience of learning new things. The love of learning keeps me working. I'm interested in all things in the world. Scenery, the ocean...life itself. The trees, animals, flowers, science, the stars...life itself. All keep me inspired in my work. The struggle for justice and peace."
Object Description
Title | Hye Sharzhoom, April 1979 |
Alternative Title | Vol. 1, no. 1 April 1979 |
Publisher | California State University, Fresno |
Publication Date | 1979 |
Description | Ethnic supplement to the Collegian campus newspaper. |
Contributors | Armenian Studies Program and Armenian Students Organization |
Technical Information | Scanned at 360 dpi, 8-bit greyscale, TIFF uncompressed. |
Language | eng, arm |
Description
Title | April 1979, Page 1 |
Full-Text-Search | 4U.8 OU-Pd-flMP The Armenian Movement Armenian Martyrs' Week, April 16-241979 Armenocide: Crime Against Humanity By MARK MALKASIAN The Twentieth century has no place for the Armenian genocide. A world immersed in suffering no longer senses human tragedy. The modern age has been saturated by tragedy~ graphic, explicit and vociferous tragedy. World sympathy exists as a commodity, a commodity staked and monopolized. It belongs to Jews, Blacks, Indians and Palestinians. The Armenocide cannot compete for the world's tears. Of course, Armenians can produce corpses—two million corpses—but the Armenocide remains relegated to history's back burner. The Armenian Case is not a pressing international topic. There are no fanatical guerillas, struggling for national identity in the mountains of Turkish- occupied Armenia. The Armenians have no charismatic leader, suitable for 45- second tirades on the evening news. The Armenians only have the stark, numbing reality of the Armenocide. The facts are simple: On April 24, 1915 the Turkish government began the systematic annhilation of the Armenian people - the "final solution" of the Armenian problem. Under the guise of World War I, two million Armenians were murdered. The Armenian people were torn from the homeland they had occupied since the dawn of civilization. Three thousand years of Armenian history were abruptly severed by a single, savage blow of the Turkish sword. Of course, there are outcries among the Western powers. Armenia was a valuable playing card of international diplomacy. The 1920 Treaty of Sevres, promoted by the Western Powers, provided for the establishment of an inde- Survivors of the Armenocide of 1915! Many of the orphans miraculously the later Turkish to perish from prepetrated were famine and disease. See Page 3 spared the fate of their parents during The Armenian Case in the UN By BRYAN BEDROSIAN The Armenian Case, embodying the national aspirations of the world's six million Armenians, is today expressed in the form of Paragraph 30. Paragraph 30 is one section of a large report being prepared by a Special Rapporteur for the UN Subcommission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. This subcommission is part of the larger UN Commission on Human Rights. Paragraph 30, as quoted from the Genocide Report, reads: "Passing to the modern era, one may note the existence of relatively full documentation dealing with the massacres of Armenians, which have been described as the 'first case of genocide in the twentieth century'." If accepted, Paragraph 30 would provide at least the legal basis for the return of Turkish-occupied Armenia. In response to Turkish pressures, Paragraph 30 was omitted from a previous draft of the Genocide Report, adopted last September by the UN Subcommission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities. The 'United States abstained in the final vote. The Special Rapporteur cited three reasons for rejecting Paragraph 30: 1. It is impossible to compile an exhaustive list of historical examples of genocide. 2. It is important to maintain unity within the international community in regard to genocide. 3. In many cases, delving into the past might reopen old wounds that are now healing. Like the Armenian people, Paragraph 30 has not disappeared. It was reintroduced and approved by the UN Commission on Human Rights. (The Commission had the power to reject the Genocide Report, accept it, or send it back to the Special Rapporteur.) Despite heated protests by the Turkish government, the subcommission in its March meeting in Geneva, reendorsed insertion and voted to send the Report back to the Special Kapporteur for reconsideration. Paragraph 30 today lies in the hands of the Special Rapporteur. Paragraph 30 demonstrates the influence a united Armenian people can have. The reconsideration of Paragraph 30 was a major victory in itself, especially considering the strong objections and strenuous lobbying of the Turkish government. The Armenian people, without a nation, without an army-seemingly powerless in the international arena- succeeded in bringing the Armenocide before the nations of the world. U.S. Ambassador Set Momjian, the personal representative of President Carter on the UN Human Rights Commission, was instrumental in forcefully presenting the facts of the Armenocide before the world body. Varaz-an Inspired Armenian Artist . .';.j') ?JJ By BARLOW DER MUGRDICHIAN Varaz Samuelian is an artist of international reknown, famous both for his paintings and sculpture. I have known Varaz for many years and I interviewed him while he was at work in his studio. Varaz, when did you come to Fresno, California and why? "After World War II in which I fought both as a Russian partisan and as a French partisan I came to San Francisco to be with my brother in November, 1946. My wife and I had friends in Fresno so in 1957 we moved to Fresno. I moved also because I wanted to live in a community where there were a lot of Armenians." - - . What inspires you as an artist? "Everything inspires me. I am against war of any kind, especially nuclear war, and the quest tor peace inspires me. The ocean and the sky and the trees inspire me. But I find that the struggle for war and peace is very important to me." You sculpted the now famous David of Sassoon sculpture which now stands in the Fresno Courthouse square. Why did you make David of Sassoon? "The legend of David, the heroic story of a people inspired me. For me, he embodies the powerful symbol of the Armenian spirit of freedom. He embodies the spirit and history of Armenia. But more than that David of Sassoon stands for all the courageous fighters against oppression...Man striving for justice and peace." Which forms of art do you prefer to work with? "All are the same. Sculpture, painting all are the same to me. If you can do one you can do them all. It's all in the way you look at it." You are influenced by many things but what keeps you working as an artist? "Learning, the experience of learning new things. The love of learning keeps me working. I'm interested in all things in the world. Scenery, the ocean...life itself. The trees, animals, flowers, science, the stars...life itself. All keep me inspired in my work. The struggle for justice and peace." |