Page 15 |
Previous | 15 of 21 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
National Japanese American Historical Society dotoyed evidence 3id knowledge Court Challenges (Cont'd from Page 7) based on his belief that both orders were discriminatory and contrary to the democratic principles on which the United States was founded. Yasui v. United States Minoru Yasui was an American born citizen of Japanese ancestry, a graduate of the University of Oregon Law School, a U.S. Army reserve officer, an attorney and active member of the Japanese American Citizens League. He had recently worked for the Japanese Consulate in Chicago. After Pearl Harbor, he resigned to enlist in the military, but was denied on the grounds that he was Japanese. Yasui challenged the curfew orders on the grounds of racial discrimination. He served nine months in solitary confinement while awaiting trial. He was tried and convicted. Korematsu v. (Jilted States Born and raised in Oakland, California, Fred Korematsu tried to enlist in the Navy, but was denied because of his Japanese ancestry. He was employed as a welder in a shipyard in San Leandro, CA. He was fired after WWII broke out because of his ancestry. Korematsu ignored the eviction orders, and attempted to alter his appearance with plastic surgery in the hope of remaining with his fiancee who was not Japanese, until they could move to Nevada. He was arrested by the FBI and after spending two and a half months in jail, Korematsu was found guilty of violating the eviction orders. He was sentenced to five years probation, but the judge did not impose the sentence. Despite paying bail, Korematsu was again taken into custody by the Military Police. He was confined at the Presidio Army Headquarters and then sent to Tanforan "Assembly" Center. Court Appeals Hirabayashi and Yasui appealed their cases separately to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled together on the two cases, unanimously upholding the curfew law for Japanese Americans living in Military Area #1 (West Coast region). The Court declared that the President and Congress had used the war powers provided in the Constitution appropriately. The Supreme Court made its ruling on Korematsu in 1944, over two years after Japanese Americans were removed from the West Coast and put into detention camps. In a 6-3 vote, the Court upheld the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast. In handing down the decision on the eviction, the Supreme Court sidestepped the ruling on the internment. Coram Nobis Forty years later, the federal district courts in San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle vacated the original convictions of Korematsu, Yasui, and Hirabayashi in response to a petition for a writ of error coram nobis - a legal procedure requesting the original decision be set aside due to fundamental errors and injustice at the time of trial. The petition, presented by a legal team headed by Sansei attorney Dale Minami, asserted that fundamental errors were made in that officials of the War Department altered and destroyed evidence, withholding knowledge of the evidence from the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court; that the War Department and the Justice Department failed to inform the Supreme Court of falsities contained in DeWitt's Final Report; and that both departments suppressed evidence on the loyalty of Japanese Americans. These startling discoveries were made by legal historian Peter Irons and researcher Aiko Herzig Yoshinaga. They found that the Supreme Court decisions of the 1940s had been based on the misrepresentation of available facts and on the deliberate suppression of evidence. In her opinion, Federal Appeals Court Judge Marilyn Hall-Patel (San Francisco) found "substantial support in the record that the government deliberately omitted relevant information and provided misleading information" to the Supreme Court. She wrote, "The judicial process is seriously impaired, when government's law enforcement officers violate their ethical obligations to the court." Postscript Min Yasui passed away just before his conviction was vacated. Gordon Hirabayashi has been a professor and visiting professor at many colleges and universities in the United States and abroad. He has authored numerous books and articles and has received many awards and honors throughout the country. Fred Korematsu was active in the redress movement with the National Coalition for Redress and Reparations and has spoken at numerous community events and universities. Mr. Korematsu recently received the highest civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, from President Bill Clinton. ■ Nikkei Heritage*Spring 1998 15
Object Description
Title | A Little Known Case For Redress Railroad and Mine Workers |
Description | The Seasonal Magazine, Nikkei Heritage, publishes another volume of their magazine. |
Subjects | Industry and employment--Railroad |
Type | image |
Genre | Periodicals |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 20 items |
Project Name | California State University Japanese American Digitization Project |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Description
Local ID | csufr_hfp_0698 |
Project ID | csufr_hfp_0698 |
Title | Page 15 |
Creator | National Japanese American Historical Society |
Date Created | 1998 - 00 - 00 |
Subjects | Industry and employment--Railroad |
Type | image |
Genre | Periodicals |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 8.45 x 10.89in |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Transcript | National Japanese American Historical Society dotoyed evidence 3id knowledge Court Challenges (Cont'd from Page 7) based on his belief that both orders were discriminatory and contrary to the democratic principles on which the United States was founded. Yasui v. United States Minoru Yasui was an American born citizen of Japanese ancestry, a graduate of the University of Oregon Law School, a U.S. Army reserve officer, an attorney and active member of the Japanese American Citizens League. He had recently worked for the Japanese Consulate in Chicago. After Pearl Harbor, he resigned to enlist in the military, but was denied on the grounds that he was Japanese. Yasui challenged the curfew orders on the grounds of racial discrimination. He served nine months in solitary confinement while awaiting trial. He was tried and convicted. Korematsu v. (Jilted States Born and raised in Oakland, California, Fred Korematsu tried to enlist in the Navy, but was denied because of his Japanese ancestry. He was employed as a welder in a shipyard in San Leandro, CA. He was fired after WWII broke out because of his ancestry. Korematsu ignored the eviction orders, and attempted to alter his appearance with plastic surgery in the hope of remaining with his fiancee who was not Japanese, until they could move to Nevada. He was arrested by the FBI and after spending two and a half months in jail, Korematsu was found guilty of violating the eviction orders. He was sentenced to five years probation, but the judge did not impose the sentence. Despite paying bail, Korematsu was again taken into custody by the Military Police. He was confined at the Presidio Army Headquarters and then sent to Tanforan "Assembly" Center. Court Appeals Hirabayashi and Yasui appealed their cases separately to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled together on the two cases, unanimously upholding the curfew law for Japanese Americans living in Military Area #1 (West Coast region). The Court declared that the President and Congress had used the war powers provided in the Constitution appropriately. The Supreme Court made its ruling on Korematsu in 1944, over two years after Japanese Americans were removed from the West Coast and put into detention camps. In a 6-3 vote, the Court upheld the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast. In handing down the decision on the eviction, the Supreme Court sidestepped the ruling on the internment. Coram Nobis Forty years later, the federal district courts in San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle vacated the original convictions of Korematsu, Yasui, and Hirabayashi in response to a petition for a writ of error coram nobis - a legal procedure requesting the original decision be set aside due to fundamental errors and injustice at the time of trial. The petition, presented by a legal team headed by Sansei attorney Dale Minami, asserted that fundamental errors were made in that officials of the War Department altered and destroyed evidence, withholding knowledge of the evidence from the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court; that the War Department and the Justice Department failed to inform the Supreme Court of falsities contained in DeWitt's Final Report; and that both departments suppressed evidence on the loyalty of Japanese Americans. These startling discoveries were made by legal historian Peter Irons and researcher Aiko Herzig Yoshinaga. They found that the Supreme Court decisions of the 1940s had been based on the misrepresentation of available facts and on the deliberate suppression of evidence. In her opinion, Federal Appeals Court Judge Marilyn Hall-Patel (San Francisco) found "substantial support in the record that the government deliberately omitted relevant information and provided misleading information" to the Supreme Court. She wrote, "The judicial process is seriously impaired, when government's law enforcement officers violate their ethical obligations to the court." Postscript Min Yasui passed away just before his conviction was vacated. Gordon Hirabayashi has been a professor and visiting professor at many colleges and universities in the United States and abroad. He has authored numerous books and articles and has received many awards and honors throughout the country. Fred Korematsu was active in the redress movement with the National Coalition for Redress and Reparations and has spoken at numerous community events and universities. Mr. Korematsu recently received the highest civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, from President Bill Clinton. ■ Nikkei Heritage*Spring 1998 15 |