Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
September 29, 1989 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S12217 I will not go into a long speech, because I know it is Friday. But suffice it to say that Russell Long's 38 years in the U.S. Senate were some of the most illustrious years ever spent by anybody ever to grace this body. He served our State welL He served the Nation well. We all miss him and are delighted still with his company because he is in the area frequently. This is ah appropriate honor for him, Mr. President I wish to emphasize that he did not come up with this idea We did. I called him this morning and said we were going to do this. He said, "Well, Bennett, that is awfully nice, but I didn't ask for this and I am a little bit embarrassed about it." I said, "Well, Russell, I think it is something we ought to do." Mr. President, I know my colleagues will want to do this, as well, and I commend It to the body. Mr. HOLLLNGS. Mr. President, the real pleasure of serving could not be more highlighted than that service I have had with the distinguished former Senator, Russell Long, of Louisiana. ; The fact of the matter is, when I first came to this body, I went to him and asked for the John C. Calhoun desk. He said, ""My mama had this desk and so did my daddy." I said, "Excuse me.T didn't know anyone had served in the United States whose mother and father had served in the U.S. Senate." - He came over to me as a friend when he was going to leave, and he said: "I remembered you. I told the Sergeant at Arms to move it over right quick like." And I have it today. That is the kind of friend I had in Russell Long. Mr. President, we are delighted to accept this amendment. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The junior Senator from Louisiana [Mr. BreauxL Mr. BREAUX. Thank you, Mr. President, I am delighted to now know for the first time where Russell's desk went. I was delighted to find out where it went. I was looking for it. I am delighted to know the chairman of the Commerce Committee received the desk before I got here. I am delighted to join with my colleague, the senior Senator from Louisiana, in cosponsor- tng this amendment. The work of Russell Long will be why people remember him. The Tax Code and so many things he contributed to this institution and this country will be the works the people of this country will remember him by. So that is very appropriate. How appropriate it is that this Federal building in his home town is also going to be named in his honor, and I enthusiastically endorse it. Mr. DODD. I wish to be added as co- sponsor and join with my colleagues from Louisiana and South Carolina. Mr. President, I am pleased and honored to cosponsor this amendment naming the new Federal Courthouse in Baton Rouge after our distinguished former colleague. Senator Russell B. Long. This is a fine tribute to a remarkable man. It will come as no surprise when I share with my colleagues the personal note that Russell Long is about as close as you can come to being a member of the Dodd family, and I am highly honored to be associated with this fitting gesture. I will not recite Senator Long's many outstanding legislative and civic achievements, including his skillful I guardianship of the Federal Tax Code j in his many years as chairman of the Finance Committee. These achieve-1 ments are well known to the Members of this body and the American public. On their own merits, they fully merit the honor we would accord our former colleague. Let me also cite the friendship and encouragement Senator Long extended to me in my early days in this body. A great friend of my mother and father's, Russell Long was really a mentor to me when I arrived here. He has taught me more than any other colleague about the legislative process, the art of debate and the value of col- legiality in. the cause of good government , :.''-,.'■ -":: .-" \,-.' Russell Long's knowledge, compassion and integrity made him a Senator of unusual gifts and accomplishments. They earned him a special place in my heart, and in the hearts of all who served with him. It is those qualities and accomplishments that we most appropriately honor by naming this courthouse after Senator Long, and I urge adoption of this amendment The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, the request is agreed to. Mr. DODD. This is a fine tribute to a remarkable man. It will come as no surprise when I share with my colleagues the personal note that Russell Long is about as close as you can come to being a member of the Dodd family, and I am highly honored to be associated with this gesture. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from New Hampshire. Mr. RUDMAN. Mr. President, I only served with the Senator from Louisiana, Senator Long, for 6 years. But I would say my contacts with him indicated to me this was truly a remarkable human being and a great U.S. Senator, and I am delighted to join with my colleagues. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from North Carolina [Mr. Helms]. Mr. HELMS. I think some more folks on this side of the aisle will want to speak in favor of this. Russell Long is a favorite with all of us who ever served with him. In addition to all the other compliments paid to Russell here this morning, I would add the most important one: He is married to a North Carolina girl. I thank the Chair. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The question is on the adoption of the amendment offered by Mr. Johnston. The amendment (No. 898) was agreed to. Mr. HOLLINGS. I move to reconsider the vote by which the amendment was agreed to. Mr. RUDMAN. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. jMtCEPTED COMMITTEE AMENDMENT ON PAGE «i7\ LINES 4 THROUGH 10 \ The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The ] question now is on agreeing to the ex- I •cepted committee amendment on page | 18, lines 4 through 16. J The Senator from North Carolina [Mr. Helms]. EXCEPTED COMMITTEE AMENDMENT ON PAGE 41. LINES 4 THROUGH 10 Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the first excepted committee amendment be set aside in order that we may proceed to the excepted committee amendment on page 41, lines 4 through 10. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection? The Chair hears none. The- first committee amendment that was excepted is laid aside temporarily and the Senate will proceed to the second committee amendment which was excepted. Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, on a personal basis, I am reluctant to do what I am about to do because of my great affection for Daniel Inouye and Spark Matsunaga. But thinking of the American people, and this business of creating one new entitlement after an^ other, compels me to raise a point of order against the pending amendment. I am not sure how many Americans understand what happened in April of last year when the Senate passed the authorization to pay $20,000 to each Japanese American who was relocated or interned during World War II, including many who were interned before President Roosevelt signed Executive Order No. 9066. Before the Senate passed the bill, an amendment was added in committee specifically to make payments under the bill subject to the availability of appropriations, that is, to make them discretionary funds rather than to create a new entitlement. As a matter of fact, I recall Senator Glenn made the point on the floor, he said: Titles II and III of the bill do not create new entitlement funds. Rather, the bill directs that the authority to enter into contracts and make payments under titles II and III is subject to the availability of appropriations. As great an affection as we all have for our two distinguished Senators from Hawaii, I do not believe many Senators would have voted as they did in April 1988 if they had been aware that they were in the process of creating a new entitlement.
Object Description
Title | September 29, 1989 |
Creator | Unknown |
Date Created | 1989-09-29 |
Description | A collection of government documents is presented. In more specific, Congressional records from September 29, 1989. |
Subjects | Redress and reparations |
Type | image |
Genre | Government record |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 9 items |
Project Name | California State University Japanese American Digitization Project |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Description
Local ID | csufr_hfp_0877 |
Project ID | csufr_hfp_0877 |
Title | Page 1 |
Creator | Unknown |
Date Created | 1989-09-29 |
Subjects | Redress and reparations |
Type | image |
Genre | Government record |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 8.42 x 10.90in |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Transcript | September 29, 1989 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S12217 I will not go into a long speech, because I know it is Friday. But suffice it to say that Russell Long's 38 years in the U.S. Senate were some of the most illustrious years ever spent by anybody ever to grace this body. He served our State welL He served the Nation well. We all miss him and are delighted still with his company because he is in the area frequently. This is ah appropriate honor for him, Mr. President I wish to emphasize that he did not come up with this idea We did. I called him this morning and said we were going to do this. He said, "Well, Bennett, that is awfully nice, but I didn't ask for this and I am a little bit embarrassed about it." I said, "Well, Russell, I think it is something we ought to do." Mr. President, I know my colleagues will want to do this, as well, and I commend It to the body. Mr. HOLLLNGS. Mr. President, the real pleasure of serving could not be more highlighted than that service I have had with the distinguished former Senator, Russell Long, of Louisiana. ; The fact of the matter is, when I first came to this body, I went to him and asked for the John C. Calhoun desk. He said, ""My mama had this desk and so did my daddy." I said, "Excuse me.T didn't know anyone had served in the United States whose mother and father had served in the U.S. Senate." - He came over to me as a friend when he was going to leave, and he said: "I remembered you. I told the Sergeant at Arms to move it over right quick like." And I have it today. That is the kind of friend I had in Russell Long. Mr. President, we are delighted to accept this amendment. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The junior Senator from Louisiana [Mr. BreauxL Mr. BREAUX. Thank you, Mr. President, I am delighted to now know for the first time where Russell's desk went. I was delighted to find out where it went. I was looking for it. I am delighted to know the chairman of the Commerce Committee received the desk before I got here. I am delighted to join with my colleague, the senior Senator from Louisiana, in cosponsor- tng this amendment. The work of Russell Long will be why people remember him. The Tax Code and so many things he contributed to this institution and this country will be the works the people of this country will remember him by. So that is very appropriate. How appropriate it is that this Federal building in his home town is also going to be named in his honor, and I enthusiastically endorse it. Mr. DODD. I wish to be added as co- sponsor and join with my colleagues from Louisiana and South Carolina. Mr. President, I am pleased and honored to cosponsor this amendment naming the new Federal Courthouse in Baton Rouge after our distinguished former colleague. Senator Russell B. Long. This is a fine tribute to a remarkable man. It will come as no surprise when I share with my colleagues the personal note that Russell Long is about as close as you can come to being a member of the Dodd family, and I am highly honored to be associated with this fitting gesture. I will not recite Senator Long's many outstanding legislative and civic achievements, including his skillful I guardianship of the Federal Tax Code j in his many years as chairman of the Finance Committee. These achieve-1 ments are well known to the Members of this body and the American public. On their own merits, they fully merit the honor we would accord our former colleague. Let me also cite the friendship and encouragement Senator Long extended to me in my early days in this body. A great friend of my mother and father's, Russell Long was really a mentor to me when I arrived here. He has taught me more than any other colleague about the legislative process, the art of debate and the value of col- legiality in. the cause of good government , :.''-,.'■ -":: .-" \,-.' Russell Long's knowledge, compassion and integrity made him a Senator of unusual gifts and accomplishments. They earned him a special place in my heart, and in the hearts of all who served with him. It is those qualities and accomplishments that we most appropriately honor by naming this courthouse after Senator Long, and I urge adoption of this amendment The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, the request is agreed to. Mr. DODD. This is a fine tribute to a remarkable man. It will come as no surprise when I share with my colleagues the personal note that Russell Long is about as close as you can come to being a member of the Dodd family, and I am highly honored to be associated with this gesture. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from New Hampshire. Mr. RUDMAN. Mr. President, I only served with the Senator from Louisiana, Senator Long, for 6 years. But I would say my contacts with him indicated to me this was truly a remarkable human being and a great U.S. Senator, and I am delighted to join with my colleagues. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from North Carolina [Mr. Helms]. Mr. HELMS. I think some more folks on this side of the aisle will want to speak in favor of this. Russell Long is a favorite with all of us who ever served with him. In addition to all the other compliments paid to Russell here this morning, I would add the most important one: He is married to a North Carolina girl. I thank the Chair. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The question is on the adoption of the amendment offered by Mr. Johnston. The amendment (No. 898) was agreed to. Mr. HOLLINGS. I move to reconsider the vote by which the amendment was agreed to. Mr. RUDMAN. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. jMtCEPTED COMMITTEE AMENDMENT ON PAGE «i7\ LINES 4 THROUGH 10 \ The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The ] question now is on agreeing to the ex- I •cepted committee amendment on page | 18, lines 4 through 16. J The Senator from North Carolina [Mr. Helms]. EXCEPTED COMMITTEE AMENDMENT ON PAGE 41. LINES 4 THROUGH 10 Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the first excepted committee amendment be set aside in order that we may proceed to the excepted committee amendment on page 41, lines 4 through 10. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection? The Chair hears none. The- first committee amendment that was excepted is laid aside temporarily and the Senate will proceed to the second committee amendment which was excepted. Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, on a personal basis, I am reluctant to do what I am about to do because of my great affection for Daniel Inouye and Spark Matsunaga. But thinking of the American people, and this business of creating one new entitlement after an^ other, compels me to raise a point of order against the pending amendment. I am not sure how many Americans understand what happened in April of last year when the Senate passed the authorization to pay $20,000 to each Japanese American who was relocated or interned during World War II, including many who were interned before President Roosevelt signed Executive Order No. 9066. Before the Senate passed the bill, an amendment was added in committee specifically to make payments under the bill subject to the availability of appropriations, that is, to make them discretionary funds rather than to create a new entitlement. As a matter of fact, I recall Senator Glenn made the point on the floor, he said: Titles II and III of the bill do not create new entitlement funds. Rather, the bill directs that the authority to enter into contracts and make payments under titles II and III is subject to the availability of appropriations. As great an affection as we all have for our two distinguished Senators from Hawaii, I do not believe many Senators would have voted as they did in April 1988 if they had been aware that they were in the process of creating a new entitlement. |