Page 19 |
Previous | 19 of 28 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
National Japanese American Historical Society L-r: Min Yasui, Peggy Nagae, Don Tamaki, unidentified, and Dale Minami hard at work at the Asian Law Caucus offices in San Francisco, 1983. Courtesy of Peggy Nagae. civil rights issues. However, none of the federal judges in Oregon was known as a civil rights liberal. The hearing on Jan. 16, 1984 got off to a bad start when Belloni asked, "Now what's this case about?" Nagae says, "It was clear to me that he had not read our briefs. He was inundated by the Dalkon Shield case in Eugene at the time - a heavy-duty case with lots of attorneys and big dollars." Victor Stone employed a different strategy than that used in San Francisco. He agreed that the conviction should be vacated. However, since Yasui had suffered no lasting consequences, he claimed, there was no "case or controversy." There was no need for a hearing, and the petition should be dismissed. Nagae and Willner argued that the court had a duty to "protect the public interest" by examining the constitutional aspects of the petition. Belloni's opinion on Jan. 26 stated "The two requests reach the same result, the only difference being that the petitioner asks me to make findings of governmental misconduct... I decline to make such findings forty years after the events took place... both sides are asking for the same relief but for different reasons. Petitioner would have the court engage in factfinding which would have not legal consequences. Courts should not engage in that kind of activity." Nagae comments, "I think Judge Belloni did what was expedient. There was a world of difference between and Judge Voorhees (on Hirabayashi). Voorhees had read all the Magic Cables, he was schooled and knowledgeable. It made a difference if people understood the historical significance of what we were doing, instead of just viewing it as a case to get off their docket." The Yasui team hired Clayton Patrick, who had extensive appellate experience, to help file an appeal. The case bogged down in technicalities about whether the case was a civil or criminal matter, and whether the appeal had been filed in time. Before the appellate court could review his case, Min Yasui died. Fukumoto sighs, "That was a sadness. But the case needed to go forward because that was what Min was all about, he really was a dedicated fighter. We were determined not to let his death stop our efforts." Nagae adds, "It was a big, big loss. I remember speaking at his funeral and then going to work on the brief because the government immediately made a motion to dismiss. We fought it to the Supreme Court and then just got one line from them saying the case was moot." The Seattle Team: "Families - spouses and children - everybody made sacrifices so we could work on the case!" - Craig Kobayashi The initial lead counsel on the Hirabayashi case was Kathryn Bannai, Lorraine's sister. The Bannai's involvement was a natural outgrowth of their upbringing. Growing up in Gardena, CA, they watched their father, Paul Bannai, evolve in public service - from emcee at local community functions to Gardena City Councilman to the first Japanese Americans state assemblyman in California. In 1981, he was appointed the first director of CWRIC. Kathryn recalls, "When I was finishing high school, my father advised me that if I wanted a career that would benefit the community, I should become a lawyer." She graduated from law school in 1977. By 1981, she was president of the Seattle JACL, with a community-based law practice in Seattle's International District. "In Seattle there was already a groundswell of activism around redress. For many years, Nisei leaders like Chuck Kato, Cherry Kinoshita, Shosuke Sasaki and Henry Miyatake had advocated for direct payment of redress to individuals. These pioneers created a climate of support for the lawsuit. Reopening Gordon's case dovetailed with the broader political and social effort." At the time, Bannai shared law offices with three other sole practitioners: Rod Kawakami, Roger Shimizu and Mike Leong. She soon got them interested in the case. "At first we thought the Seattle team would have a fairly limited role. When the cases were not consolidated, we started calling up Sansei, other Asian Pacific Americans and anyone who was sympathetic. The work just had to get done. I'd call people and say, 'Can you give us an evening?' - even one evening would help. There were documents to Than All Of US (cont'd next page) ► Spring 1999 19
Object Description
Title | Coram Nobis and the Continuum of Activism |
Description | The Seasonal Magazine, Nikkei Heritage, publishes another volume of their magazine. |
Subjects | Redress and reparations--Legal petitions/coram nobis cases |
Type | image |
Genre | Periodicals |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 27 items |
Project Name | California State University Japanese American Digitization Project |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Description
Local ID | csufr_hfp_0674 |
Project ID | csufr_hfp_0674 |
Title | Page 19 |
Creator | National Japanese American Historical Society |
Date Created | 1999 - 00 - 00 |
Subjects | Redress and reparations--Legal petitions/coram nobis cases |
Type | image |
Genre | Periodicals |
Language | eng |
Collection | Hirasuna Family Papers |
Collection Description | 8.43 x 10.90in |
Rights | Rights not yet transferred |
Transcript | National Japanese American Historical Society L-r: Min Yasui, Peggy Nagae, Don Tamaki, unidentified, and Dale Minami hard at work at the Asian Law Caucus offices in San Francisco, 1983. Courtesy of Peggy Nagae. civil rights issues. However, none of the federal judges in Oregon was known as a civil rights liberal. The hearing on Jan. 16, 1984 got off to a bad start when Belloni asked, "Now what's this case about?" Nagae says, "It was clear to me that he had not read our briefs. He was inundated by the Dalkon Shield case in Eugene at the time - a heavy-duty case with lots of attorneys and big dollars." Victor Stone employed a different strategy than that used in San Francisco. He agreed that the conviction should be vacated. However, since Yasui had suffered no lasting consequences, he claimed, there was no "case or controversy." There was no need for a hearing, and the petition should be dismissed. Nagae and Willner argued that the court had a duty to "protect the public interest" by examining the constitutional aspects of the petition. Belloni's opinion on Jan. 26 stated "The two requests reach the same result, the only difference being that the petitioner asks me to make findings of governmental misconduct... I decline to make such findings forty years after the events took place... both sides are asking for the same relief but for different reasons. Petitioner would have the court engage in factfinding which would have not legal consequences. Courts should not engage in that kind of activity." Nagae comments, "I think Judge Belloni did what was expedient. There was a world of difference between and Judge Voorhees (on Hirabayashi). Voorhees had read all the Magic Cables, he was schooled and knowledgeable. It made a difference if people understood the historical significance of what we were doing, instead of just viewing it as a case to get off their docket." The Yasui team hired Clayton Patrick, who had extensive appellate experience, to help file an appeal. The case bogged down in technicalities about whether the case was a civil or criminal matter, and whether the appeal had been filed in time. Before the appellate court could review his case, Min Yasui died. Fukumoto sighs, "That was a sadness. But the case needed to go forward because that was what Min was all about, he really was a dedicated fighter. We were determined not to let his death stop our efforts." Nagae adds, "It was a big, big loss. I remember speaking at his funeral and then going to work on the brief because the government immediately made a motion to dismiss. We fought it to the Supreme Court and then just got one line from them saying the case was moot." The Seattle Team: "Families - spouses and children - everybody made sacrifices so we could work on the case!" - Craig Kobayashi The initial lead counsel on the Hirabayashi case was Kathryn Bannai, Lorraine's sister. The Bannai's involvement was a natural outgrowth of their upbringing. Growing up in Gardena, CA, they watched their father, Paul Bannai, evolve in public service - from emcee at local community functions to Gardena City Councilman to the first Japanese Americans state assemblyman in California. In 1981, he was appointed the first director of CWRIC. Kathryn recalls, "When I was finishing high school, my father advised me that if I wanted a career that would benefit the community, I should become a lawyer." She graduated from law school in 1977. By 1981, she was president of the Seattle JACL, with a community-based law practice in Seattle's International District. "In Seattle there was already a groundswell of activism around redress. For many years, Nisei leaders like Chuck Kato, Cherry Kinoshita, Shosuke Sasaki and Henry Miyatake had advocated for direct payment of redress to individuals. These pioneers created a climate of support for the lawsuit. Reopening Gordon's case dovetailed with the broader political and social effort." At the time, Bannai shared law offices with three other sole practitioners: Rod Kawakami, Roger Shimizu and Mike Leong. She soon got them interested in the case. "At first we thought the Seattle team would have a fairly limited role. When the cases were not consolidated, we started calling up Sansei, other Asian Pacific Americans and anyone who was sympathetic. The work just had to get done. I'd call people and say, 'Can you give us an evening?' - even one evening would help. There were documents to Than All Of US (cont'd next page) ► Spring 1999 19 |